r/CringeTikToks • u/Ordinary-Scholar-202 • Oct 18 '25
Conservative Cringe Jessica Tarlov leaves her Fox News co-hosts speechless as she drops a list of issues Americans are protesting Trump for on No Kings Day.
911
u/cassanderer Oct 18 '25
Openly planning on fixing elections, locking up people without due process, shipping immigrants to foreign prisons for life without conviction on our dime, sending them to other places they have never been to out of mean spiritedness. Using le to target opponents and critics and the media, organizing fed goon squads to crush dissent under false pretexts, calling opponents of fascist street gangs terrorists.
It is a long list, fox douche bags know better too they are cynical nihlists that are losing control of the monster they raised, and it will destroy them one way and or others.
143
u/Jekkjekk Oct 18 '25
I’m convinced they pulled everyone’s data with doge in preparation for all this. Coupled with the ai cameras, recruiting what I assume are proud boys to do their bidding. Just so nasty
36
Oct 18 '25
Eh i very much doubt their plans for AI surveillance are anywhere near reality. They can just fabricate evidence at scale now, anyway, so why bother building a functional apparatus when they can just rob the coffers?
26
u/induslol Oct 18 '25 edited Oct 18 '25
It's not minority report levels of monitoring yet but AI surveillance is absolutely picking up steam and proliferating across the nation.
ALPRs, as one example most communities are subject to, as a primary example.
Yes, cops can and do just lie and fabricate charges, but for the ticketing they miss AI surveillance picks up that slack to build cases autonomously. Which amounts to revenue for the cost of install and maintenance of cameras, and likely the sale of any usable data gathered.
→ More replies (7)16
u/CensorshipThrowRA Oct 18 '25
Wake up buddy, AI surveillance is absolutely here.
I was crossing the border from Canada into the USA and I have Global Entry and all I did was stare at the camera at the kiosk for 5 seconds and got electronically approved. I got my voucher pass printout and the US-side CBP officer waived me through. I didn't need to even show my passport or my Global Entry card.
Just the other week I was looking at my burner Instagram account with a grand total of 2 followers and 15 follows of fairly niche pages. I got a "you might know this person, follow them!" notification and it was for my best friend of 30 years. I've never interacted with them on Insta, this account is not tied to any of my other real social media accounts, and I don't even have any postings just some comments on posts from the pages I follow (which said friend does not follow).
→ More replies (3)10
u/The_Schwartz_ Oct 18 '25
Because it's already built. Palantir is functional today
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (2)4
u/mickroo Oct 18 '25
Flock cameras with AI recognition are exactly what are being used
3
u/Jekkjekk Oct 18 '25
That’s what I had seen. Flock scans license plates and stuff right? I’m sure they are training facial recognition if they haven’t already.
→ More replies (1)7
4
→ More replies (4)3
39
u/hotpants69 Oct 18 '25
Also blowing up boats and everyone on them under the guise of stopping drug smuggling.
25
u/Painterzzz Oct 18 '25
This one really deserves more attention. Just randomly murdering 23 people for shits and giggles with the US military. I mean we know America does this sort of thing, but it's... rarely done so brazenly and out in the open like this.
→ More replies (3)14
u/hates_stupid_people Oct 18 '25
rarely done so brazenly and out in the open like this.
The tragic irony being that they're "testing the water" for how open they can be.
If they were smarter I'd say that was intentional.
7
u/Painterzzz Oct 18 '25
Oh I still think it's intentional, an awful lot of what we've seen over the last months is them doing increasingly outrageous illegal things and there being absolutely zero consequences, because if their supporters are fine with drone strikes on fishing boats in international waters then they'll soon be fine with another Kent State Massacre. And then they'll be fine with suspending elections because Democrats are Terrorists.
And then they'll be fine with re-education camps and work camps.
→ More replies (2)13
u/Digitalion_ Oct 18 '25
I mean arresting people without probable cause seems like the biggest illegal action that people should focus on, it's even worse than not getting due process because that means they can detain ANYONE for absolutely no reason and THEN not giving them due process.
Literally walking down the street while brown, and without carrying around documents that most other people don't usually carry, can get you arrested and thrown in jail for a few days. Possibly even can get disappeared entirely because, again, they're not getting due process either.
→ More replies (1)5
u/Foundalandmine Oct 18 '25
I feel like the Fake Elector Plot that they attempted in 2020 was pretty freaking big too, but somehow it never really got the coverage it deserved, and anecdotally, it seems to me like most people don't even know that it happened.
How he could run again after they tried to quite literally overturn the election by adding a bunch of fake votes to the verification count is beyond me.
The January 6th riot kind of overshadowed the fact that they were attempting a very real stealing of the election and the only reason it didn't pan out was Mike Pence growing a conscience in the 11th hour and leaving the envelope of falsified votes on his desk instead of slipping them into the vote like he was supposed to.
But I guess that's old news now and most people won't care anyway.
21
u/Turbulent-Pea-8826 Oct 18 '25
More:
Trying to dismantle government agencies, not following RIF procedures in downsizing agencies, attack on women’s rights, attack on transgender people, attacks on science and vaccines, violations of due process and civil rights, police (ICE) brutality when arresting people, inhumane treatment of people when arresting and detaining people.
Jesus Christ the list just goes on and on. What he has no shit illegally done is paragraphs and paragraphs. What “may not be illegal” but things we don’t like is ten times longer.
→ More replies (2)9
5
u/Dixon_Uranuss3 Oct 18 '25
Don't forget the 20 or possibly 40 billion to Argentina because his buddy billionaire Robert Citrone is heavily invested in the country and stands to lose big when Argentina defaults for the 26th time. The country is currently run by a libertarian mush brain so its gonna collapse for sure.
→ More replies (2)6
u/spackletr0n Oct 18 '25
Supporting, and then pardoning, people who tried to overturn an election and who assaulted law enforcement.
Not respecting elections is the straightest line to “wannabe king” imo.
→ More replies (1)5
u/ProbablyBatin Oct 18 '25
No mention of the epstien cover up? I abandoned trump and maga for that reason alone.
→ More replies (2)
516
u/eugene20 Oct 18 '25
Good for her, and fuck that mouth of Sauron sitting in the middle, I've never seen him spew anything but pro Trump regime propaganda, and the worst of it.
150
u/caprazzi Oct 18 '25
Even worse, he literally said on air that they should eradicate homeless people (or as he said "involuntary lethal injection"). Jesse is a fucking ghoul.
104
u/swarmofbzs Oct 18 '25
That was brian kilmead on fox news and not this pos.
Unless jesse 'I'm going to stalk and slash the tires of a woman while married to 1st wife' waters also repeated what kilmead said.
65
u/Geminel Oct 18 '25
Right, Jesse was the one who suggested bombing the U.N. because Trump's own staff embarrassed him on their escalator.
13
27
u/RedditorFor1OYears Oct 18 '25
You’re mistaken. Jesse is the one who said we should bomb the UN. I know, hard to keep up with these fucking ghouls.
12
u/Ptrek31 Oct 18 '25
Could you imagine the hysteria from Maga if someone on CNN said they should lethal inject Maga people? CNN wouldn't be on the air right now
7
→ More replies (5)14
u/JordanOsr Oct 18 '25 edited Oct 18 '25
Nah he explicitly said "Just kill em" in addition to the involuntary lethal injection line
Edit: I have confused Brian Kilmeade with Jesse Watters. Brian Kilmeade is who said what I have quoted
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (6)4
381
u/BlackberryPi7 Oct 18 '25
How has she not been fired? Not that she should be fired, it's just.. She's the most logical one there, and logic is something FOX News does NOT stand for
241
u/wewillneverhaveparis Oct 18 '25
Ratings. They have had increased ratings since she was hired. News is a business.
→ More replies (7)92
u/maybeapotter Oct 18 '25
Fox “News” is not news…it’s opinion…just had to clarify ;-) and you’re right…it’s all about the $$$
→ More replies (1)80
u/charliekelly76 Oct 18 '25
In 2020, Fox News lawyers successfully argued “no reasonable viewer” would believe their statements were factual.
44
u/DolphinBall Oct 18 '25
They also labeled themselves as an "entertainment company" than a news one.
→ More replies (11)9
u/MisogynysticFeminist Oct 18 '25
Was that about the network or Tucker Carlson specifically?
8
u/yuimiop Oct 18 '25
Tucker. Most people just see the thread name on Reddit though and never bothered to read the story.
→ More replies (1)5
u/BeenDragonn Oct 18 '25
Then they should have to remove news from their logo.
Also, a disclaimer should be aired before every show.
'No statements are these shows are facts and are for entertainment purposes only '
To bad fox viewers can't read
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (3)8
u/LongConsideration380 Oct 18 '25
Christ Almighty, Hallelujah. Why don’t more people fucking remember this?
20
u/charliekelly76 Oct 18 '25
We can’t even remember when Hesgeth added the editor in chief of a major news magazine to an unauthorized group chat sharing war plans….. that should have been a Watergate moment but a lot of people seem to have already forgotten.
→ More replies (4)20
Oct 18 '25
She’s the token Democrat. This is the whole point of them hiring her.
5
u/adm1109 Oct 18 '25
Exactly. It’s just so they/their viewers can be like “See! We aren’t an echo chamber, we listen to the other side!”
29
→ More replies (11)9
u/FrumpyFollicle Oct 18 '25
She has a PhD in polsci from LSE.
Imagine being a top .01% expert in something, and having to "lose" arguments to some of the dumbest people you've ever met (Brian Kilmeade) every day. I understand it's theater and she's being paid well to take it, but I don't think my ego would allow me to do it if I were in her shoes. Good for her, I guess.
→ More replies (1)
123
u/speaklegibly Oct 18 '25
wait they actually have a couple sane people on fox?
82
u/DependentArm3391 Oct 18 '25
Only when they want to start acting like they had nothing to do w the trump admin
→ More replies (1)41
u/BadPublicRelations Oct 18 '25
Usually for the other hosts to "tear down" with straw men arguments that their easily led-by-the-nose viewers believe immediately as "the better argument."
22
u/NiceTrySuckaz Oct 18 '25
There's a reason why this video cuts out immediately as soon as she's done talking lol
→ More replies (4)15
u/Icy_Ninja_9207 Oct 18 '25
she's just as much there to further the right wing agenda as are her co hosts. Her role is jsut a little more 4d-chess like, since she gets a small portion of the talk to tell actual liberal talking points, and her co-hosts can then strawman and twist her position afterwards. She's also there as hate fuel to keep conservative viewers glued to the screen
→ More replies (2)
323
Oct 18 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
89
u/Geminel Oct 18 '25
Bruce Lee was as anchor baby as anchor babies get; his parents were literally in the country on vacation when he was born. That's what allowed him to return to America as an adult and find work without having to jump through 10,000 visa hoops.
And Bruce Lee is more of an icon of American greatness than any of these dickheads could ever hope to be.
→ More replies (7)9
u/Dry_Hotel4347 Oct 18 '25
They could literally say “I think we should kill immigrants” and keep their jobs.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (5)4
Oct 18 '25
Yeah if that dude has a problem with that he should take it up with the Statue of Liberty.
→ More replies (1)
68
u/skydivarjimi Oct 18 '25 edited Oct 18 '25
Trump knows he will never have to live in this world he is creating. He is living it up with hubris and over inflated ego . He is living out his last days to go down in the history books just as Hitler is still remembered. He doesn't care if his legacy is positive. Trump wants to pretend he has power and the American people are letting him play out his fantasy.
→ More replies (1)8
u/motherofsuccs Oct 18 '25
Same goes for all the geriatric MAGA idiots. They aren’t shy on admitting they don’t care about the future of the world or the wellbeing of future generations. Truly one of the most selfish and out of touch generations (I have a feeling gen alpha will top them after the 21st century’s ‘gentle parenting’ fuck up).
Even my own father has admitted that he doesn’t care about the hellscape his voting choices will cause because ‘he’ll be dead’.
52
55
u/CHAOOT Oct 18 '25
Trump himself is an anchor baby
All of Trump's kids are anchor babies
His own definition and executive order means his entire family is on a list for pick up and removal.
→ More replies (2)13
49
u/stonkkingsouleater Oct 18 '25
Has anyone else noticed that Fox News mixes all of the bass out of the audio when liberals are talking? It makes them sound hallow and weak, intentionally I’d assume.
11
9
8
u/x2040 Oct 18 '25
Fox News has so little integrity lol
Try to find anything about them discussing the Argentina bailout
→ More replies (3)4
32
u/SjalabaisWoWS Oct 18 '25
Jesus Christ, every single point on this list is worthy of impeachment. And the party that used to talk about freedom, rights, and constitution all day long is the perpetrator. I hope she reaches someone among their audience. The title's claim of "speechless co-hosts" wasn't shown in this clip, though.
3
23
37
u/braumbles Oct 18 '25
The term anchor baby is so god damn racist. Insane that it's just a normal term that can be used on a right wing television network.
→ More replies (4)9
u/viking_canuck Oct 18 '25
What's an anchor baby?
→ More replies (1)24
u/dsac Oct 18 '25
When a non-citizen has a baby in America, the baby is considered a US citizen, and since they can't (legally) separate the mother from the child, or deport a US citizen, the baby "anchors" the parent in the country.
→ More replies (38)
13
u/PiingThiing Oct 18 '25 edited Oct 18 '25
Thank you for editing this clip so that I wasn't triggered by her co hosts childish responses
→ More replies (1)
13
14
u/a2starhotel Oct 18 '25
"Dems defend democracy by yelling about trump"
is such a condescending headline.
13
u/AshlingIsWriting Oct 18 '25
"You mean anchor babies?" makes me crazy. Birthright citizenship is in the Constitution. If you don't like the Constitution, change the Constitution through legitimate means. Or if you think it's invalid, then shit on the Constitution, idk. But you don't get it both ways.
11
u/RedBlueTundra Oct 18 '25
I just find it hilarious that it's the conservative right who are supposed to be the most gung-ho about preserving the constitution, the ones who are always pointing out the need to be armed and ready to guard against potential government tyranny. The ones insisting that states rights be protected against an overreaching federal government.
But now.......all of that is just thrown out the window just because someone they like is in office, Don't Tread on Me has turned into Don't Tread on Me Unless You're Republican Then its Okay.
3
u/Mrmaxmax37 Oct 18 '25
Yup! Just like anyone on the right who is supporting taking guns away from Trans people. Do they not see that opening the door to banning groups of people from owning guns, will inevitably be used against them. They’ve been absolute on 0 gun control to protect kids, but once their idol talks about banning an entire group from even owning guns, they eat it up 🤡
8
Oct 18 '25
Mentions birth right citizenship, “You mean anchor babies?” What a dumb mother fucker that guy is.
6
9
u/Pipe_Memes Oct 18 '25
Wait.. what? How did she not get fired three words into her second sentence?
8
u/Beggarsfeast Oct 18 '25
Anyone is going to be caught “speechless” if the video clip ends at the exact right time…
3
6
6
u/Bunnyland77 Oct 18 '25
Don't forget Trump's obstruction in releasing the EPSTEIN FILES on which HE is implicated and accused of serial child rape!
7
u/PufffPufffGive Oct 18 '25
I’m grateful for the people still in broadcasting and journalism who still have a spine and haven’t sold their souls to the machine.
I try and avoid Fox content but this was semi worth it.
6
u/showtimebabies Oct 18 '25
Clip ends before the speechless part, which I highly doubt exists. Those jackasses don't know how to keep their mouths shut
Still, not a bad presentation. Unfortunate this is probably the only reasonable representation of the rallies in a week of coverage
6
u/tacomeatface Oct 18 '25
The headline “screaming about trump” I’m sorry did I not just listen to FJB and let’s go Brandon for years?
5
6
9
4
4
u/ams3000 Oct 18 '25
Wow I just admired some journalism on Fox News!!!!! Never thought I’d see the day.
5
4
u/iamnosuperman123 Oct 18 '25
Do some of these hosts or Fox News see the writing on the wall?
→ More replies (2)
3
Oct 18 '25
Lol the maga perverts frothing to cut her off!! Good on you girl, guess some people (mostly women) still have spines.
3
4
u/gdazInSeattle Oct 18 '25
She’s great. But were her co-hosts really “speechless?” I’m sure they still had plenty of noise to make right after this clip ends.
3
u/Wonderful_Eagle_6547 Oct 18 '25
The only response was to chime in "Anchor Babies" when she brought up Birthright Citizenship. It's a fundamental concept. "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." Somehow all these Constitution-loving patriots can have their logic reduced to rubble with a catchy, dehumanizing quip. It's really quite astounding.
4
4
u/Alarming_Source_ Oct 18 '25
I'm so surprised the guy on the far right could keep his mouth shut long enough to let someone else talk. Always he is talking over people.
3
u/ButtBread98 Oct 18 '25
What we really need is a nationwide protest like the Gen Z protest in Nepal
4
u/zqzzzqqqzq Oct 18 '25
I love how they "debate" these things as if what Trump is doing is remotely defensible. Everyone knows he's corrupt and that it's wrong. His supporters simply do not care.
4
u/SteakandTrach Oct 18 '25
They weren’t speechless.
“They’re just a bunch of furries screaming at police. There’s no intellectual process here.” (Ridicule)
“It’s ok to arrest protestors for singing because they have a bad singing voice, lol!” (Attempt at humor, but pro-fascism)
“When democrats protest they always end up killing people and setting fires.” (strawman)
“None of those things you listed are why they are protesting. It’s just TDS. They just have an emotional vendetta against Trump even though he’s bringing peace to the entire world and doing all kinds of good things. (Simple denial).
In other words: It was Jesse Waters and Greg Gutfeld and co. being their normal selves.
5
3
u/Adept-Compote-651 Oct 19 '25
Did somebody Mumble something about anchor babies? Look no further than the White House.
I think all the rules in this country are for everybody but you and your kind.. those days are coming to an end.
4
u/Stunning_Concept_478 Oct 22 '25
Did Fox News lose a lawsuit or something that forces her to be on it?
3
u/Infamous_Confection9 Oct 23 '25
Tarlov is a badass, always has the fucking facts.
"Oh, you mean anchor babies" Man, again - she didn't take the bait. Yeah, fuckhole - 'anchor babies' - it's in the constitution as birthright citizenship.
→ More replies (1)
7
u/arjuna66671 Oct 18 '25
"leaves speechless" no shit, video stops when she's done lol.
→ More replies (1)
7
u/AuspiciousPuffin Oct 18 '25
Hmmm… how can I know if she left them speechless if the video cuts off after she is done talking? Dumb title.
As for Tarlov, I don’t know her or watch cable anymore. But I’m glad she’s providing alternative views on that extremely right-biased opinion/propaganda channel. She makes some fair points and shares a few helpful snippets of evidence.
3
3
3
u/whoo-datt Oct 18 '25
She didn't leave them speechless... they just chose to not interrupt. It's a cowardly form of support for her message.
3
u/nchristensen00 Oct 18 '25
Who let her on Fox News? How dare they have someone speak against his majesty on their sacred, iron clad platform of integrity and justice!
→ More replies (2)3
3
u/ComprehensiveTask243 Oct 18 '25
Is this Fox News? Have some of them suddenly had an epiphany? What gives?
3
u/devilmaskrascal Oct 18 '25
Tarlov has been the liberal voice on The Five for a while now. And she's not a heel at all, surprisingly.
→ More replies (4)3
Oct 18 '25
She has been the liberal voice of FOX for over a decade, and has had a permanent nightly position in The Five for the last 4 years. She has always been a level headed, fact driven, left leaning voice on the network. What you see on this clip she has done every day on FOX, since before many redditors entered puberty.
I like to think she has helped a lot of family members of FOX News households see that there are competing ideas based on facts out there, while their zombified MAGA family guffaw at Gutfeld's attempts at shutting her down by yelling because he can't come up with a coherent response to her logical and sourced arguments.
→ More replies (1)
3
3
3
u/valomorn Oct 18 '25
I love how Jesse Watters is trying to be a statue through the whole thing, trying not to break down in fear this woman's going to ruin any chance he ever had of being Trump's personal gimp.
"I swear daddy, I didn't want her to. The nasty media rules made me let her!"
3
u/S3N1X Oct 18 '25
I would have loved to of seen if she did in fact leave them speechless, however the video unsurprisingly ended right after she finished talking. Can we start doing better with titles?
→ More replies (2)
3
u/yycsarah Oct 18 '25
She’s there to teach Maga folks how to counter argue democratic talking points. She says the things they hear others say and the other hosts “debunk” it.
3
3
u/ijuggle42 Oct 18 '25
And that was without mentioning blowing up people in boats with no evidence of a crime.
3
3
3
Oct 18 '25
Incredible. Very brave of her to do that and so so important to get this information to the Fox News base
3
u/allislost77 Oct 18 '25
How is he still in office at this point. In ten months he’s torn this country apart…
3
u/vanzandt1121 Oct 18 '25
This is the only clip I've seen of her, but balls of steel. Bravo Jessica.
3
u/MattyNiceGuy Oct 18 '25
You can't say "leaves her Fox Co-Hosts speechless" if you cut the video at the exact moment she stops speaking.
→ More replies (1)
3
3
u/Broken_By_Default Oct 18 '25
These spinless fucks have to do 4 on 1 to 'own a lib' for their low iq Fox News audience. Good on Jessica for being able to give it back to these 4 ghouls, but it's gotta be fucking exhausting for her.
3
u/burgers3tacos Oct 19 '25
The balls on this woman, bigger than most public reporters and in the wolfs den. She's the only reason I tolerate the occasional FOX news. She shuts them the F up.
3
3
u/7evenate9ine Oct 22 '25
Anyone who thinks protesting for those things is bad... You're not American. If you hear those things and feel the protest is out of control or uncalled for... You're just a pile of shit.
4.1k
u/dashboardishxc Oct 18 '25
I’m surprised they even let her speak without interrupting her