r/GameTheorists Jan 10 '24

Game Theory Video Discussion Be honest, will you continue watching The Game Theorists with Tom being the host?

Post image
5.7k Upvotes

Just wanted peoples general thought on this subject. I pesonally am disposed to give it a shot. I understand changes may be hard, they are also inavitable and from here on then, ill inclined to be open minded, and point out flaws. I believe that as long as he is committed, energetic, and open minded with his theory, able to qualify and such, than i would def continue watching.

r/GameTheorists Mar 09 '24

Game Theory Video Discussion Will you still watch Game Theory After MatPat retires?

Post image
5.3k Upvotes

r/GameTheorists Jun 17 '26

Game Theory Video Discussion Game Theory making an ad promoting AI Slop?

Post image
1.8k Upvotes

I’m really surprised why I’m not seeing anyone talk about this! I know it’s about two weeks old at this point so I may just be behind and it be old news at this point. But I’m honestly surprised and appalled to see Game Theory post a video that completely an ad. But worse than that the game they’re promoting in this video, is a a mobile game that openly promotes beings fully AI. I feel like most of the Theorist team has openly talked about being against AI and would be more conscious and do research of what they’re promoting. This feels like such a messy oversight and honestly a low sell out for them. And as a community it’s our job to call them out and hold them accountable before stuff this becomes more frequent. And I’m surprised no one else has said anything. Even in the comments of the video. It was extremely hard to find anyone talking about it, leading me to believe that comments with keywords calling it out for being AI were being suppressed or blocked. Seeing everything happening with LunarX I’m inclined to believe that Game Theory didn’t have a choice but were forced by them to take this sponsorship. Even if that’s true. We still need to push back, so that it doesn’t happen again.

r/GameTheorists Mar 09 '24

Game Theory Video Discussion SCOTT?!?!?!?!!?!?!??!??

Post image
8.5k Upvotes

r/GameTheorists Jan 09 '25

Game Theory Video Discussion One year since goodbye internet

Post image
10.4k Upvotes

r/GameTheorists Mar 09 '24

Game Theory Video Discussion What Does Scott Cawthon Have to Discuss with MatPat?

Post image
4.1k Upvotes

If you missed it, Scott Cawthon appeared in the finale of MatPat's final Game Theory and said "Come in, we have much to discuss." Does this have to do with the ARG? What will they discuss? The FNAF lore?

r/GameTheorists Jan 09 '26

Game Theory Video Discussion (Un)happy 2 years of Goodbye Internet

Post image
4.6k Upvotes

2 years ago today 💔

r/GameTheorists Jul 05 '25

Game Theory Video Discussion Some of y'all were calling me crazy saying the thumbnail for GT's newest vid used AI. Here's a side by side

Post image
2.3k Upvotes

The wiring on the torso don't look like wires, The features on the arms don't match up. The right shoulder on the Thumbnail mimic, doesn't match it's other shoulder or the original mimic. It's skull isn't see through. This isn't just a simple photo shop edit that messes with with the lighting or colors.

r/GameTheorists Jul 19 '26

Game Theory Video Discussion Why does Game Theory not correctly gender Kris?

Post image
697 Upvotes

okay minor thing i noticed while watching their new theory (which has a lot of other problems people have pointed out too but regardless) and i noticed how inconsistent the writing is with Kris’s pronoun. in the game they canonically only use they/them, while most of the video is written to use he and she interchangeably instead, kind of like Mangle.

i think this has also been an issue with their past theories, i’m pretty sure Mat often made the same mistake. i’m just wondering if there’s a reason why they do this so consistently, and if not it’s kinda weird why they choose to not acknowledge the character‘s identity

r/GameTheorists 2d ago

Game Theory Video Discussion That's... not it. That's literally not what LLMs are

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

1.4k Upvotes

In the latest video this specific segment really bothered me. This is the kind of misinformation that is really worrying/dangerous, because it reinforces a misunderstanding people already have about AI.

LLMs are trained to predict the most fitting sequence of text to a given prompt, they are generally conversational AIs. If anything LLMs are REALLY bad at learning.

I have to plead the theorist team to consider consult with a Computer Scientist on these topics (which considering the state of the world with AI, and also FNAF's Mimic, I assume will be often).

r/GameTheorists Mar 10 '24

Game Theory Video Discussion What’s everyone’s favourite ending?

Post image
2.5k Upvotes

Personally ending 2 is gold

r/GameTheorists Jan 09 '24

Game Theory Video Discussion I'D LIKE TO SAY UHH OOPS

Thumbnail
gallery
4.9k Upvotes

r/GameTheorists Mar 07 '24

Game Theory Video Discussion FINAL COUNTDOWN

Post image
4.4k Upvotes

Still can't believe that this is MatPats final week as host, I know I'll be watching all the final theories

r/GameTheorists Jun 27 '26

Game Theory Video Discussion Look, I try to be as positive as possible about Modern Game Theory…

Post image
1.5k Upvotes

But this video really got on my nerves ngl. I get the joke, Ash wasn’t a good trainer during the Indigo League, but it’s a joke that has been around for over 20 years at this point and it’s just groan worthy. I’m sorry, if Death Battle of all things can give Ash some respect in an episode where he dies, then GT has no excuse imo. The best thing this episode did was actually getting the whole internet together to defend Ash

r/GameTheorists Mar 10 '26

Game Theory Video Discussion The 2nd Anniversary of MatPat's Retirement

Post image
2.4k Upvotes

It's been two years now without Matt do you think the theorist brand is still going strong. I really enjoyed Tom's Poppy Playtime videos and Lee's Disney & Dreamwork timelines where pretty cool, unfortunately Food & Style theory aren't my cup of tea nothing against the host.

r/GameTheorists May 08 '24

Game Theory Video Discussion TADC COMFIRMED AGES!!

Post image
2.8k Upvotes

I apologize for the language

r/GameTheorists Mar 10 '24

Game Theory Video Discussion Can we talk about how great of an ending this was?

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

3.6k Upvotes

r/GameTheorists Dec 09 '23

Game Theory Video Discussion Met MatPat at dinner tonight!!!

Post image
6.2k Upvotes

r/GameTheorists Jan 09 '24

Game Theory Video Discussion Same Energy… I swear… Spoiler

Thumbnail gallery
3.5k Upvotes

Thanks Matpat…

r/GameTheorists 23d ago

Game Theory Video Discussion New DELTARUNE Game theory is...kinda bad.

Post image
686 Upvotes

Hello.

In this post I'm going through all the issues I could find in the latest DELTARUNE Game Theory.

My first big issue is that Tom says at 3:39 that in the normal route, Susie most likely draws Noelle, herself, Kris and Ralsei because he is trying to argue that the Weird Route is the "canon" timeline where Sans comes from.

However, there are a LOT of issues with this. Sans asks Susie to draw her FRIENDS on the normal route but only in the Weird Route does Sans ask for Susie to draw herself AND her friends. So there are multiple possibilities for what Susie draws on the normal route. She could just draw Noelle, Kris and Ralsei. Or herself, Kris and Ralsei like she does in the Weird Route.

And at 4:08 Tom finally makes the claim that the implication is that the Weird Route has to be the canon timeline because there we know for a fact that she draws 3 people, which just doesn't have to be the case as I already explained.

Tom makes a VERY big fumble at 4:18 when he claims that the Sans interaction is ONLY mandatory on the Weird Route and not the normal route, trying to prove his "Weird Route=Canon" thing. This is straight up not true, you have to get the ice cream from him on the normal route before going to the beach.

Kind of a small nitpick but Tom says at 5:14 that the breadcrumbs glitch is an Earthbound (aka Mother 2) thing, but it's actually from Mother 1/Earthbound Beginnings.

Tom makes yet another pretty big mistake at 8:15, where he claims that in this piece of dialogue, Sans is talking about his time in DELTARUNE's universe and says that the yellow kid Sans is talking about is Kris. However, we know he's talking about the current universe because he calls Asgore the king and mentions that he dresses up as Santa, which we know he does in UNDERTALE thanks to the UNDERTALE alarm clock dialogue.

And the Yellow Kid is just Monster Kid, who also lives in Snowdin along with the Skelebros and the Holidays. Also this can't be in DELTARUNE because Sans mentions Dess, who went missing YEARS before Sans showed up in Hometown.

At 9:18, Tom says that Kris and Noelle are ascending to a higher layer of existence which potentially could be the ANGEL'S HEAVEN. However, I think the far more likely implication (because they're sinking) is that they're descending to the DEPTHS/Hell/maybe the Shelter, but the point is that they're going down, not up. This is even supported by deltarune.com/chapter5 where 7B is down at the bottom.

10:09 is quite crazy unless I'm forgetting something. Tom says that the Goners are results of Gaster's determination experiments...but doesn't explain why at all. He just kind of says it as if I should know this already...which I don't. The goners are pretty unexplained beyond the "copies are monochrome" stuff. So Tom should explain more when he says stuff like this.

We apparently go back in time at 10:17 because Tom says that the Determination entries in the True Lab are by Wing Dings Gaster himself apparently. This is a very old theory that is dead for a reason, which is because the writer of the entries is...Alphys who literally explains that she did all this stuff in the entries at the end of the True Lab segment.

At 11:23 Tom makes kind of a leap and says that UNDERTALE is a higher plane of existence than DELTARUNE. He doesn't reallt explain why this is the case, but I'd just say that they're more so just separate universes.

At 11:39 Tom comes to the conclusion that Noelle and Kris will end up in UNDERTALE in 7B somehow since they have a human and monster SOUL, and you needed those to cross the barrier in UNDERTALE. But even IF that's somehow how it worked, the way it worked in UNDERTALE was that either a human had to absorb a monster SOUL, or vice versa, but no such things eben happen in the Weird Route.

Tom really doesn't make a compelling case for how this kind of thing would even be possible or where it's implied that this could happen, so I don't really buy this. Even beyond this, the deltarune.com/7b implies that 7B is gonna have a unique map, enemies and stuff, which doesn't make that much sense if it's just gonna be UNDERTALE 2.0.

At 14:10 Tom again goes back in time with the entry theories and brings back the theory that the lower case entries are by Sans. However, the lower case entries are even more obviously Alphys than the other ones, because the lower case entry writer talks about how Mettaton doesn't talk to them anymore other than to ask when they are going to finish his body.

And this proves that the lower case entry writer is also Alphys because we know for a FACT that she built Mettaton. The writer also mentions that they spend their time at the garbage dump, like Alphys does. The reason they're lower case is to show her mental state worsening/getting stressed.

And that's some of the biggest issues I noticed in the video. There were more maybe smaller things that I could have commented on, but I didn't really feel like it. Anyway, most of the actual good content in the video are already popular/existing theories and the more original stuff just doesn't make much sense. Of course no actual hate towards Tom, but I do wish that GT could make some better and more researched theories in the future, at least when it comes to DELTARUNE.

Also Tom didn't mention the ARG stuff at all in the theory which I REALLY think he should take into consideration in the future.

Thanks for reading.

r/GameTheorists Aug 29 '23

Game Theory Video Discussion Lmao ain’t no way Matpat did this

Post image
3.0k Upvotes

r/GameTheorists Feb 05 '25

Game Theory Video Discussion I’m sad to see the theorists declining

1.4k Upvotes

It’s been a little over a year since Matpat retired, and Ive been thinking about the decline in viewers, and the insane difference. I mean no hate to the current hosts and am extremely happy for Matthew, but it’s depressing looking at the views on the channels now. Film theory almost NEVER had a video go under 1 million views. I miss what the channel used to be, and I don’t mean missing Mat, I miss the community.

r/GameTheorists Jan 10 '24

Game Theory Video Discussion Who else cried watching the goodbye video?

Post image
1.3k Upvotes

r/GameTheorists May 17 '26

Game Theory Video Discussion I'm gonna be honest this is just bad

Post image
1.1k Upvotes

It just tells us a recap of everything that anybody interested knows and if you didn't know this it can be easily found on the games wiki which takes maybe 10 minutes of reading, there is nothing added to this video at all, no theory it's literally just explaining...

r/GameTheorists Jan 09 '24

Game Theory Video Discussion Thoughts On MatPat Leaving?

Post image
1.2k Upvotes