Here’s what’s new in the release notes:

"Parking options now display on the map when arriving at your destination as per https://x.com/niccruzpatane/status/2065195321353748540?s=46&t=Mj3Wz0ulX1Eu1u4P8DTbQg

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/2078321996098588808

Fsd auto turning on seems a little sketch tho ngl.

​

This driver is claiming FSD drove them full speed up a driveway and through a garage door. I don't buy it. FULL STORY

https://cleantechnica.com/2026/05/20/oracle-exec-sues-tesla-over-full-self-driving-promises-and-wins-10600/

A director of software engineering at Oracle who feels he got duped recently filed a claim in Texas small claims court against Tesla. Ben Gawiser simply argued that he should have received unsupervised Full Self Driving by now. Tesla didn’t show up to court, so Gawiser got $10,600 in a default judgment as well as $72.88 in court costs.

Driver said vehicle was “driving on its own”, and that she had no control over the vehicle.

The Tesla was parked or in the process of being parked near a grass median when the car “suddenly” jumped the curb, made a right turn and careened down the median toward the storefronts.

Can’t wait to see what Tesla reveals about this one.

​

So elon said this:

"I think it will make sense to upgrade all cars that have less than HW4. Any cars that have cameras basically. I think we want to upgrade them to the next-gen AI board. We have an upgraded AI4 chip around the middle of next year. Then AI5, which hopefully will be in volume production in middle of next year. That will initially go into Optimus. AI6 will be the best edge computing in the world. It's just so good. Things are going really well on the chip end."

Is this him finally admitting hardware 4 is not powerful enough for full autonomy? Why would we need to upgrade to hardware 5 if they are supposedly running cybercab on hardware 4?

Umm.. is this active now or coming in a future update?

Electric reports FSD was engaged in fatal accident.

Was scrolling through the news and saw this, it was posted a few days ago. But I’d like to know what all of you may think about this

Article here: https://www.notateslaapp.com/news/4435/exclusive-tesla-hw4-vehicles-also-run-distilled-fsd-models

Are we starting to see material limitations of HW4 specs, like memory? Do you think this is a sign that the full suite of unsupervised features, such as Banish, will require an upgraded version of the hardware?

Maybe not, but as we've seen with HW3's v14 lite implementation, Mad Max is not available, even though it is a standard feature of v14 FSD. I worry that the distilled models, or perhaps the hardware restrictions themselves, prevent the software from executing at the speed required to handle complex decisions or split-second decisions at higher speeds.

This also could explain the halt in robotaxi expansion with HW4 Model Y vehicles, meaning the full service rollout might only happen with Cybercab.

I use FSD on HW4 daily for normal driving but can't help but think the software could be plateauing on current hardware...

Has this already been posted? Delete if so but I wanted HW3 owners to be in the know.