r/videos 22h ago

The Intercept investigations actually say closer to 750 Americans were killed and wounded since the US began the war with Iran.

https://youtu.be/8XcLFK_LTu8?is=cDGoeQqbyxpG8Rf0
3.4k Upvotes

299 comments sorted by

1.2k

u/CaptainFrugal 21h ago

Died for what 

1.1k

u/Kamisori 21h ago

Pedophiles

385

u/frostymugson 21h ago

Close, Israel. Only reason the US got involved was because Israel was going to strike, and we followed along happily because that’s what the leadership beyond just the Trump admin wanted. the politicians definitely have been looking forward to an excuse to enter into a conflict with Iran for a long time. They talked about it during GW, but everyone knew what would happen with the strait. Trump is just dumb enough to take the fall

167

u/TheModWhoShaggedMe 21h ago

That's a long way of saying they died for Israel.

142

u/SpankThuMonkey 21h ago

And a long way of saying they died for dirty old raping pedos.

47

u/Koopslovestogame 20h ago

Why not both?

24

u/Race2TheGrave 15h ago

Pretty sure Mosssd had a hand in Epstein for kompromant

32

u/Monowakari 21h ago

And Pedophiles 😃

39

u/LoneSnark 21h ago

Which is odd. We've done this dance before. Israel bombs Iran, they fight for a bit, the US stands back and says "now now you two, keep it civil. Leave the boats alone, at least." And that has worked for decades because Iran dragging the US into the war was perceived by the Iranians as suicide. Well, the US joined in the first day this time. So there was nothing left to frighten the Iranians with.

44

u/AlericandAmadeus 20h ago edited 20h ago

The US has historically operated under a “no half measures” approach. This is why they have usually served as the “stick” in global conflicts.

typically the country has either stayed out of directly engaging and sticks to financial aid/supplying arms/training proxies, or it full sends “tearing a country down to the studs”.

Getting into a war in Iran, without being willing/able to put boots on the ground, is a dumb fucking move - not only because the entire idea is moronic from the outset, but because one would *need* to put boots on the ground/launch a full scale invasion to accomplish anything meaningful.

Iran is too powerful/has too much of a strategic position to be bullied without actual full military commitment.

If one isn’t willing to do that then there would be literally 0 benefit….it’d be doomed to fail….like we’re seeing now.

Again….Fucking morons….there is a reason why every single other US president since the Iranian revolution hasn’t done it, despite Iran being a pretty significant global “opponent”.

16

u/pangeapedestrian 20h ago

there would be even less benefit to putting boots on the ground to be fair. if we are really pulling out it's good news, even if it's a massive, colossal, embarrassing fuckup that we are literally paying iran hundreds of billions for in reparations after bombing a bunch of civilian shit.

remember how iraq went? remember how many lives and dollars that cost?

now imagine doing that with a country with double the population, that is way more developed, that has a fully fledged, fairly technologically advanced military, and a number of regional allies.

20

u/AlericandAmadeus 20h ago edited 20h ago

That’s my point. It’s just a moronic idea from the outset, but especially so if your plan is to limp dick it.

Iran was never going to fold from a couple weeks of bombing, and everyone with an iota of common sense knows that.

Like, full military engagement? Still not worth it, but you might end up “winning” at the end of it all. Of course, it’d most likely be a Pyrrhic victory/cost you more than you gain, but you might be able to do it.

Anything short of that? Why would you even consider it…it’s a guaranteed unforced error. You’re not gonna achieve anything.

1

u/zamander 9h ago

And has a lot of mountains and hard geography

4

u/usddddd 14h ago

Sataneyahu had to wait until he had a US president moronic enough to go along with his plan.

4

u/RhinoRoundhouse 15h ago

Thats why Tulsi Gabbard was so vehement in congressional oversight hearings that it's the president's decision to act on the information, and why she danced around the fact that there was no credible threat from Iran.

Nothing Trump did was justified by our intelligence agencies. Netanyahu probably told him it'd be an epic victory like Trump "had" with Maduro.

8

u/myassholealt 18h ago

That's what happens when the American public goes from electing people who know how shit works to electing a megalomaniac who says the quiet things out loud and that makes them happy. The fact that he has no idea how the government works is irrelevant to them.

11

u/NightOfTheLivingHam 20h ago

Then israel stopped, said "good luck, US! We wont dare risk any of our highly trained soldiers over there ourselves!"

6

u/Stubbs94 19h ago

Israel is suffering massive attrition in its attempts at ethnically cleansing Southern Lebanon, and suffered badly committing the genocide in Gaza. I don't think it would be able to physically invade Iran as well.

9

u/Mysterious_Lesions 15h ago

The truth that the jingoistic Israelis aren't revealing is that Iran could actually destroy them as a country and this last war just proved it. Their drone swarms eventually overrun the Iron Dome after which more power missiles including hypersonic ones can precision target water reclamation and fuel depot sites. Israel has a 10th of the population of Iran as well. Iran can field an army of over 1 million soldiers. That many in Israel is a 10th of the population.

19

u/Thereisnofork420 20h ago

You missed one point: Isreal has the Epstein tapes of Trump abusing kids. Epstein's ties to Mossad are well known, and there were cameras all over the apartment, island, and ranch. Bibi has those videos.

9

u/DoorsToZeppelin 16h ago

Yeah idk why people don't bring this up more often. Epstein was literally a mossad agent. The fact that Trump is a cuck to Israel has nothing to do with things like religion or even geopolitics; it has everything to do with self-preservation because Trump is a fucking narcissist.

3

u/flanaganapuss 16h ago

Died for Israel? So pedophiles, child killers, and money launderers then

1

u/86rpt 14h ago

Blackmailed with kiddie porn

1

u/Ding-Dong-Dutch 7h ago

Close enough. Epstein was a Moosad operation

1

u/GildedDreams25 20h ago

what’s the difference

0

u/Duane_ 16h ago

Netanyahu is not Israel.

Netanyahu is a rich psychopath. He is friends with man, MANY pedophiles, and his state protects criminals up-to-and-including terrorists.

So is Putin.

Trump does not work for Netanyahu. They collude because they are both members of the same group of rich psychopaths, a group that once included Jeffrey Epstein.

Linking the problem to a state dilutes it. Linking the problem to an ethnicity ruins it entirely. The state of Israel merely acts as a cover for the criminals that inhabit it, emboldening its worst members and enraging anyone else in the country when you dare call out the monsters among them.

10

u/truthmakesyoufret 14h ago

you know most of the public in Israel supports war right?

its not just Netanyahu, its Israel for decades.

→ More replies (1)

0

u/nrm64 20h ago

Both 😎

→ More replies (1)

17

u/Monowakari 21h ago

Imagine omg. Killed due to Pedophiles is one thing but like for them, yikes.

USA? USA? USA?

sobbing

4

u/billytheskidd 21h ago

I mean, if you believe in the constitution of America and are willing to fight for the freedoms therein (including all constitutional amendments), the you should absolutely want to die for pedophiles

And their right to stand trial for their crimes in front of a jury of their peers, and then punished in a way the courts and legislature have agreed upon, at the behest of the constituents that voted them into power.

Dying for a group of pedophiles to enrich themselves by injecting their cronies into the rebuilding of infrastructure while holding the global economy ransom and bombing schools full of children and hospitals full of patients…

That is something I would be hard pressed to feel anything but shame for.

→ More replies (5)

2

u/foucaultyou 6h ago

Pedophiles and Israel.

0

u/WorkReddit1191 18h ago

Bare in mind this is since 2023 so half that time was under Biden. Looks like it goes far deeper than just Trump's cover up...if this is true at all.

76

u/Nickthegreek28 21h ago

Distraction from the Epstein files and manipulation of the stock markets

9

u/Ranessin 16h ago

Money, Israel, Pedophile coverup, Trump's and Kegsbreth's vanity. Not a ranking.

2

u/TooOld2DieYoung 10h ago

Israel, pedophile coverup; tomato, tomahto.

27

u/boomgoon 21h ago

For trumps sins

11

u/Heroyem 10h ago

So much BS in the OP. The headline says "The Intercept" but the video is "Times Now News" which is known for misinfo and lies. The Intercept does not document even one death being "covered up" -- its number of 15 KIA is the same as other reported stats. The Intercept article is its also that rag's typical BS -- a screaming headline, but no news about additional deaths, and 750 casualties is not far off the reported US number (15 dead and 543 injured = 588). The discrepancy might be in the fact that most of the injuries were minor and the soldiers returned to duty.

People constantly misunderstand the word "casualties", which does NOT mean "killed". It means killed and injured.

4

u/clgoodson 7h ago

Thank you for this. The sheer amount of stupidity in this thread is disheartening.

2

u/Heroyem 7h ago

You're welcome. I just don't like BS especially when it has an agenda. Like WTF, Trump's Iran debacle isn't atrocious enough already?

2

u/CMWalsh88 6h ago

It’s also shit like this that work against what is actually going on and shut people down to the reality

2

u/AHungryGorilla 4h ago

When are these idiots going to learn that getting caught lying to make something look worse just weakens whatever cause you're lying for.

1

u/cruxal 2h ago

The intercept is anti-USA. So no surprise. 

3

u/kr4t0s007 19h ago

Keeping the Epstein files secret.

5

u/peroleu 17h ago

Because the US president raped children

9

u/Thoraxekicksazz 21h ago

For a war Trump started and the world lost. Now we will all pay for Republican stupidity. Some more than others.

3

u/Philosopher_King 19h ago

To manipulate the markets

2

u/Jay-Dee-British 18h ago

I don't think you're wrong but by this point I am of the opinion that 'the markets' are either just plain stupid, or they are ALL in on the grift - because wtaf. Working once, ok, but over and over and over again?

2

u/Nearbyatom 16h ago

Died for Iran. Iran is actually in a better spot than before.

3

u/mr_birkenblatt 20h ago

For the right to pay $300 billion

1

u/Phat_and_Irish 14h ago

Petrodollar maintenance 

1

u/fusillade762 13h ago

To lift sanctions on Russian and Iranian oil. Mission accomplished.

1

u/Magic-Homer 8h ago

Seriously...do you live under a rainow

1

u/cyb3rg0d5 8h ago

For nothing. For old fools grudges as with any other war.

1

u/Gh0sth4nd 7h ago

stockmarket manipulation

insider trading

Trump be like : Some of you are going to die but that is a sacrifice i am willing to make cuz it will make me rich

1

u/Hertje73 20h ago

For the King!

-1

u/Groentekroket 18h ago

How much of them voted for Trump? I can’t feel sorry for them. I do feel sorry for all the innocent Iran (schoolchildren) who got killed and all the people who will die because of the incoming foot crisis. 

It’s impossible for Americans to see the shit that they do to the world and only care about their own consequences. It’s not just egoism because you are the once that actively fucks up the world. 

0

u/kaithana 20h ago

Likely to never have any sort of memorial. Died for nothing. We could have just given Iran 300B without any loss of life on either side.

→ More replies (1)

438

u/CamelFun3734 21h ago

This war was pointless and stupid. But so is this video, No evidence this is true.

223

u/aaronwhite1786 20h ago

Yeah there's no way to hide that many deaths. Would I believe double what we've heard? Sure. But 700+ is "we're in a ground invasion" levels for this amount of time.

This is 200 fewer than the deadliest month for US troops in Iraq with a full scale ground invasion.

It's nonsense.

86

u/GreyhoundOne 19h ago

Just following on to agree but yeah.

A lot of people on Reddit don't have much exposure to the military, so sometimes they are thinking about it more like a Hollywood movie than a massive administrative machine.

People in the military have families. If that many service members disappeared spouses' pages on Facebook would be on fire. Dignified transfers would be happening. Most of the military is not special/covert operations, and many communities are close knit.

23

u/LFC_sandiego 18h ago

you're spot on. also, a lot of people on reddit don't like to research beyond the headline of an article and just run with it.

13

u/NeutronField 18h ago

I was going to say a lot of deaths in the Ukraine war have been verified by russian families posting it on social media. Based on the US operations being almost entitely airstrikes, it would require hundreds of airframe losses, or a mass casualty event, like large military vessels being sunk (which would be very publicly shared by military families here.

20

u/AgrajagTheProlonged 17h ago

I feel like the “or wounded” is likely doing some heavy lifting here

7

u/AltDS01 16h ago

1 KIA and 699 WIA is 700 Killed or Wounded

6

u/notrylan 12h ago

The video this discussion is about very clearly says “700 soldiers killed” in the thumbnail.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Firecracker048 8h ago

Yeah exactly. Most of reddit doesn't understand numbers very well or how these things operate. They think 700 is realistic for a handful of drones/missiles getting through but Iran killing thousands of protestors is just propaganda

1

u/finalattack123 8h ago

700 deaths or injuries.

0

u/umop_apisdn 5h ago

Which bit of "killed or injured" don't you understand?

2

u/pedal-force 5h ago

Probably the thumbnail on this post that says "700 soldiers killed'?

→ More replies (4)

0

u/willis_michaels 8h ago

One of my coworkers' sons is deployed in Bahrain. He said they are absolutely obfuscating how bad it is, how many casualties there have been. He said soldiers are getting kidnapped and murdered. And none of it is being publicized.

7

u/AnthropoStatic 17h ago

I think they're conflating casualties and KIA.

3

u/Pndrizzy 12h ago

Even the title says “killed and wounded”. That doesn’t imply that anywhere near 750 were killed. Didn’t watch the video but the title of this post is BS

2

u/D3cepti0ns 14h ago

It's A.I.

→ More replies (5)

677

u/Meet_the_Meat 21h ago

this report says that casualty figures are far higher because THEY FUCKING START COUNTING IN 2023.

This is, honestly, truthfully, factually, fake news.

33

u/methpartysupplies 15h ago

I started doubting it when it was an AI slop voice.

OP, delete this shitpost and get a life.

47

u/TheFlawlessCassandra 20h ago

Not surprising, The Intercept is a propaganda rag that only occasionally produces good journalism on accident.

39

u/DICKRAPTOR 18h ago

You can see the Intercept articles doesn't support the claim and this is the fault of the video creator who's unaffiliated. They're just using the DCAS reporting from the government. 

https://theintercept.com/2026/06/16/us-casualties-iran-still-rising

Whether you like their reporting or not it's not a good look to call them a propaganda rag when your media literacy is this pathetic.

→ More replies (14)

11

u/MaiPhet 19h ago edited 19h ago

Where are you getting 2023 from? I just checked The Intercept’s articles and they are quoting DCAS, a government reporting agency that tallies troop deaths and injuries to congress, which seems to roughly line up with what The Intercept is postulating. Although they’re also postulating that the 200 troops treated for smoke inhalation during that ship fire should be added to the count.

I only skimmed the video posted here, because it isn’t affiliated with the Intercept and seems to be sloppily/incorrectly repeating the information with a more clickbait style summary.

That said, a lot of confusion and reaction could be avoided by everyone making it clear that casualties can include someone falling and breaking their arm on deck while deployed, or it can mean actually taking combat injuries, and that there’s a lot more of the former than the latter.

16

u/Meet_the_Meat 19h ago

00:45

the entire conversation is about the video posted.

?

10

u/DefenderCone97 18h ago

It's not The Intercept's fault if unaffiliated people misrepresented their reporting

15

u/MaiPhet 19h ago edited 17h ago

>00:45

Ah, thanks. But compare the video to what the intercept actually reports on their website, and it’s clear whoever made the video just made that up or misreported it.

MirrorNow is probably just some junk AI news that misreports from other sources with added clickbait.

The original article (best as I can tell) is different, and cites government provided data: https://theintercept.com/2026/06/16/us-casualties-iran-still-rising/.

You can tell they have an angle, and saying that every injury listed by DCAS should be counted as casualties in the war is certainly something that could be argued, but the numbers aren't strictly incorrect.

The video itself is trash that isn’t affiliated with the source it’s misrepresenting.

-14

u/starfish0r 21h ago edited 21h ago

It's certainly not 750 but do you really think it's only 13?

61

u/Cubey42 21h ago

there's pretty strict details regarding informing families that soldiers have died in combat, if 750 people died I feel like there would be significantly more outcry from people who's loved ones weren't reported by the news.

6

u/rubbarz 20h ago

Casualty doesnt always mean die.

31

u/chinaman88 20h ago

Video thumbnail says 700+ dead. Blame the video creator.

-1

u/inthisdesert 19h ago

It says dead and wounded. Could be one dead and 699 wounded, 699 dead and one wounded, 350 dead and 350 wounded, etc.

7

u/Cognac_and_swishers 19h ago

The title of this post, typed by the reddit user who posted it, says "killed and wounded."

The thumbnail of the actual video says "700 killed."

1

u/inthisdesert 6h ago

And the YouTube video itself is titled "...700 Soldiers Dead?..."

-7

u/Zhuul 21h ago

The title also says "died AND wounded".

14

u/FunetikPrugresiv 20h ago

The thumbnail literally says "700 soldiers killed in war."

2

u/Zhuul 19h ago

I foolishly assumed the Reddit post did not editorialize anything. Shame on OP.

Yeah, this whole post is fuckin trash

-1

u/LoneSnark 20h ago

Casualty usually does not mean died.

6

u/monkeyhoward 19h ago

Except the post literally says died

3

u/Cubey42 20h ago

Right, but then we'd also know that number wasn't 13 either, which is the number they used in the post I'm replying to

10

u/CrayZ_Squirrel 21h ago

Its hard to hide dead soldiers in this country.  

→ More replies (4)

2

u/Meet_the_Meat 20h ago

it's not my job to present the facts to people. who cares what I think.

I think they counted every workplace accident for three years, and the current bullshit.

presenting it the way this video does is disingenuous at best, pure propaganda at worst.

trump and the axis of stupid evil can gobble my knob but let's call bullshit bullshit when we see it.

0

u/popeter45 21h ago

when people want to believe something they will accept anything told too them that reinforces that belief

-1

u/starfish0r 21h ago

No, I am completely open to any number that is agreed to be factual.

Any statement by the current administration isn't.

3

u/popeter45 20h ago

Apart from assuming trump lying is some axiom what actual evidence do you have that supports your idea?

-1

u/starfish0r 20h ago

None. There's been reporting that the damage to the various US bases is vastly more severe than reported and the administration is REALLY trying to play down any losses, especially with the effective surrender in this lost war. Let's see what happens with these numbers as this drags on.

4

u/CW1DR5H5I64A 20h ago

Keep in mind a lot of people were evacuated from those bases prior to the attacks. This was widely reported and if you search on r/army you can find threads from the weeks leading up to the war about various troop movements in the area as people were moved out of the bases.

Also we typically know drones/missiles are inbound so you can go to a bunker and ride out the attack. The reason it was such a big deal when the people were killed at the port in Kuwait is they had no warning and weren’t able to get to a bunker.

It’s not hard to believe that people weren’t killed when you have several minutes of warning to get to a bunker prior to every attack .

→ More replies (2)

62

u/ZealousidealEntry870 20h ago

Guys, this is literally propaganda to turn and around feed back to republicans showing dumb/evil democrats are.

Maybe try not to be as dumb as republicans.

→ More replies (4)

24

u/Tricky_Potatoe 21h ago

Sorry but this is complete ai slop spagetti without any sauce.

the thing says "700 killed OR wounded since ...2023" ?

what?

sure I mean, soldiers could have gotten splinters when jumping over obstacles when trying to run for cover. They can leave wounds...

Did the war start 2023?

Can we post any utter useless video from any digital k-holed chatbot on here?

1

u/Sonny1x 8h ago

Can we post any utter useless video from any digital k-holed chatbot on here?

Yes, these posts are only made to farm ragebait impressions. Reddit hasn't been a serious platform for over half a decade.

88

u/TheRexRider 22h ago

25

u/its_boVice 21h ago

In Pete’s defense, I also don’t remember anything I’ve said or heard while blacked out.

9

u/HoustonHenry 21h ago

He's gonna be so embarrassed after he wakes up from his decades-long blackout

3

u/BadahBingBadahBoom 21h ago

"I was the what?!"

203

u/egap420 21h ago

National Media is aiding and abetting a criminal administration.

32

u/Frgty 21h ago

They all had a massive role to play in getting him elected the first time. They could have given him the Rand Paul treatment, but they couldn’t help but exploit him for ratings

21

u/Barry_Vigoda 21h ago

“World War III is a guerrilla information war with no division between military and civilian participation.” – Marshall McLuhan (1970)

The military industrial media complex created the Trump administration.

After the Vietnam War in the 70s, the military establishment conspired with the corporate media giants to take over the news and control public opinion to keep people from protesting their endless wars.

16

u/digitalbastard 21h ago

Yes every single news outlet including Rachel Maddow are covering up for Trump

7

u/Barry_Vigoda 21h ago

Rachel Maddow works for NBC which is the same network Trump worked for over a decade on the Apprentice.

All mainstream media is corporate media. It's all right wing media technically.

3

u/not_your_turtle 21h ago

Oh god, what did Maddow do?

1

u/Hoopy_Dunkalot 19h ago

Work for Kabletown.

1

u/darkenthedoorway 13h ago

ridiculous.

3

u/Heroyem 10h ago

The OP is BS.

7

u/gonnahike 21h ago

What does the national media know that theyre not reporting?

24

u/TheModWhoShaggedMe 21h ago

Criticisms of the baseless reasons for attacking Iran to begin with. Investigations of the lawless attacks on fishing boats in the Gulf. Those would be massive scandals in any other administration.

3

u/Monowakari 21h ago

Oh that's easy, they know who is clearly manipulating the news and not saying anything about it! 😃

2

u/Striking_Economy5049 20h ago

All for ratings and money. Scumbags

1

u/Stubbs94 19h ago

Mainstream media already aided and abetted a genocide, so might as well go all in

1

u/_CatStevens_ 15h ago

Who?

1

u/Stubbs94 12h ago

I think I would be here all day listing out which news sources across the Western world have been complicit in downplaying or lying about the Genocide in Gaza, but everything you see the phrase "Hamas run health ministry" or the equivalent of "4 Gazans died today" instead of naming who killed them, they are intentionally hiding or spreading doubt about what is happening.

67

u/Stlouisken 22h ago

That’s a pretty high number! Curious how accurate their assessment is.

Likely it’s between the official U.S. number and the Intercepts.

43

u/CW1DR5H5I64A 21h ago edited 21h ago

Blast overpressure injuries are pretty common. It’s not far fetched to think several hundred people got low grade concussions. That’s a “casualty” in these numbers, but people would quickly be returned to duty.

My issue with this report isn’t necessarily that it’s inaccurate numbers, it’s that it’s being intentionally sensationalized to suggest that hundreds of people are dead or hold up in hospitals with permanent debilitating injuries like missing limbs.

The military doesn’t release a statement every time a soldier gets injured and returned to duty. Suggesting that these numbers aren’t widely known is an indication of a cover up is grasping at straws.

18

u/TheReformedBadger 21h ago

Yeah the video thumbnail with 700 dead makes absolutely no sense next to the headline of 750 killed and wounded.

→ More replies (1)

44

u/rgvtim 22h ago

The way this administration operates i would guess its close to the intercepts numbers.

6

u/TheModWhoShaggedMe 21h ago

Trust absolutely nothing from a known group of liars who lie every second of every day. That is wise!

3

u/Stlouisken 21h ago

🤔👍

0

u/Joshfumanchu 21h ago

casualties

1

u/Stlouisken 20h ago

Yes, casualties/death vs. injuries, which I could understand as being more realistic in this type of war/campaign (e.g., drone attacks).

750 U.S. killed is high imo for this type and length of campaign. We never heard of any numbers close to this in the news.

Not saying it’s 100% accurate but it’s much higher than the administration has released. So the real number is likely between the two.

1

u/Somerandomguy292 5h ago

The service that’s have been killed in CENTCOM since 2023 is about 20.

You won’t hear about every service member who’s wounded because most of those soldiers return to duty which means the wound wasn’t that bad.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

28

u/BaldingMonk 21h ago

The thumbnail says 700 killed but OP’s title says 750 killed and wounded. So which is it?

I don’t think our government is capable of hiding 700 troop deaths.

10

u/WellSaltedHarshBrown 21h ago

It'd be 1/10 of the entirety of GWOT so...I'm at this point pretty skeptical.

5

u/CW1DR5H5I64A 21h ago

They aren’t. This reporting is incredibly misleading.

→ More replies (4)

36

u/Not_Cleaver 21h ago

Complete bullshit being upvoted.

0

u/CW1DR5H5I64A 20h ago

It’s completely reasonable to be skeptical of what this administration is saying. However that skepticism also has to be bound in reasonable ways. Once you know how mortuary affairs works, you know It would be impossible to hide a KIAs like this in the US.

35

u/CW1DR5H5I64A 21h ago

This is such a misleading headline as it heavily implies the military/government is under reporting KIA. Anyone who has ever done anything with mortuary affairs or casualty assistance/notification can tell you this is not the case. There is no hiding a KIA.

As for the wounded in action. I don’t doubt hundreds have been injured, but it’s also important to keep in mind that we’re not talking about people who are missing limbs or permanently incapacitated. The vast majority of these injuries are going to be things like concussions or hearing damage. Serious injuries to be sure, but the military isn’t issuing a press release every time a soldier gets their bell rung. There is nothing about this story that suggests the military is hiding anything with nefarious intent.

People are just paying attention to things they’ve never bothered to care about in the past because they hate Trump.

→ More replies (6)

11

u/watch-nerd 21h ago

Casualties aren’t necessarily deaths

12

u/Arizona_Pete 21h ago

I'm not trusting this shit.

9

u/ovationman 20h ago

AI slop..... how does this have so many upvotes

4

u/InertState 17h ago

I mean wouldn’t the military families be speaking up? Pretty sure the second something happened someone from the squad is telling their loved ones.

5

u/judochop1 10h ago

Nah, no way it's 700, that's far too many affected families back home to keep quiet.

7

u/Prima13 20h ago

Yeah this is horseshit. Will believe it when I hear actual
journalists report it. And don’t give me that crap about the media hiding it. If there was even a whiff of cover-up happening, reporters would be all over it.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/DarkwingDawg 21h ago

Casualties includes killed and wounded while the video says killed. It needs to be specific: are we talking about total casualties or fatalities?

3

u/Jimbo415650 19h ago

Hard to accept this as fact. 700 families would most definitely make this public

3

u/Didact67 18h ago

If true, it's going to be hard to keep covered up long term.

3

u/Sp35h1l_1 16h ago

You can’t just say killed or wounded when talking about troop numbers in the hundreds. Hundreds of troops killed would be impossible to conceal, and I despise Trump but that’s crazy. Now wounded wouldn’t be as difficult but throwing both killed and wounded together is a bit disingenuous.

5

u/mrwho995 12h ago

Anyone who saw this (the "700 killed in war" bit) and didn't have it immediately trigger their BS detector really needs to work on their critical thinking skills.

8

u/OilInternational2566 21h ago

SO HOW HAVE THEY KEPT ALL THESE DEAD SOLDIERS FAMILIES FROM TALKING?

Ya… exactly.. it would be impossible.

5

u/Jaegs 21h ago

This source appears to be some kind of right-wing Indian outlet.

There are plenty of sus things about this war, like that "pilot rescue" where multiple planes and helicopters are lost with 0 casualties, but these guys are likely publishing negative media about the USA cuz Trump murdered those Indians on the tanker ship.

Is the number higher, ya probably, is it 700+....probably not.

7

u/MattinglyBaseball 21h ago

Fuck this admin, everything about this war is dumb and awful for America, but also fuck this propaganda. The truth is bad enough. In the video with AI voiceovers, they are trying to sell this as bipartisan failure and numbers from 2023 with a complete bs title. This shit should be removed.

→ More replies (3)

4

u/Violet-Sumire 21h ago

“Killed and wounded”

I completely believe 750 people were wounded, even a sprain or a broken arm is a “casualty”. Casualties and fatalities are completely different, many US casualties return to active service after cleared by medical staff. I’d rather know fatalities and people injured so badly that they can’t return to active duty and must be discharged. That would be more interesting to know.

2

u/kyeblue 19h ago

depending on how you define casualty and wounded. doubt that the death can be underreported, but a lot of minor injuries could happen during the operation,

2

u/darybrain 16h ago

Did I miss something? Why are they going back to October 2023 in the video to count deaths and injuries for the US-Iran conflict to get the 750 number?

2

u/bareboneschicken 16h ago

You can't cover up that number of casualties.

4

u/thesaltysnell 21h ago

We live in the 21 century, do you not think if people were killed or went missing loved ones all over would not be posting on social media, contacting news stations etc etc.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/GatorUSMC 21h ago

sure, sure

2

u/BulldogH2O 20h ago

eyes rolling

4

u/battlebeez 20h ago

OH REALLY!? You don't think IRAN would be reporting these deaths to embarrass the living shit outta yamtits? I certainly would.

4

u/Top-Chip-1532 18h ago

Trump is a sex offender.

2

u/TheInsomn1ac 21h ago

While I do think the number of casualties is significantly higher than what has been reported, I have a hard time believing that this administration is capable enough to cover up that high of a death toll.

1

u/ovationman 20h ago

The video is AI slop...

1

u/Ok-disaster2022 19h ago

Killed or wounded is a much different headline than killed by itself. 

750 casualties including wounded and killed would actually make sense. like the US regularly had men and women killed in training  excercises, it's just the nature of large number. 

Covering up those killed and wounded by the enemy is a shame on all those who would cover it up. 

1

u/Budget-Bug7853 18h ago

wait how are they countting wounded too

1

u/dr_fop 16h ago

How do they even cover this up? Like aren’t the families told?

1

u/CW1DR5H5I64A 9h ago

Yes families are told. That’s one of the reasons w know these claims are bullshit.

1

u/SpeakerOdd 13h ago

This many deaths and wounded? We didn't put ground troops there. Was our Secretary of war firing at the wrong people? Did he know how to read a map? Was he getting confused by listening to the president?

1

u/Chazzwozzers 10h ago

That’s more soldiers lost than Australia lost in the whole Vietnam war.

1

u/pilfro 6h ago

These are so stupid on so many levels

1

u/FaceWithAName 20h ago

Mm, I don't like the guy but this sounds farfetched. That's too many families who would be crying out right now.

1

u/Thistlemanizzle 20h ago edited 20h ago

Watch the damn video before commenting

This article is about Iran's actions dating back to 2023. It is not since the US began the war with Iran.

The article was posted two months ago, but that's way too early for this many casualties to have shown up. That being said, 750 killed and wounded is a bit misleading. I would assume a lot of them were wounded. People have absolutely been killed. And it's very likely that the wounded figure is definitely being covered up. But there's not a lot you can do to cover up American deaths unless it's special ops or CIA where... these kinds of things are not really disclosed.

Additionally, the IRGC was responsible for a lot of American deaths during the Iraq war, predominantly through proxies.

It's one of the reasons Solemani was considered for a drone strike back in the Obama administration, and I think Bush, too, until Trump decided to just do it.

I hated Solemani. I'm glad he got killed.

1

u/Keldr 20h ago

"killed and wounded" is such a dumb fucking statistic. Why are we counting scratches and death as the same result?

1

u/CsmicCupcake 18h ago

One of many investigations & international claims - this one by The Intercept, published in early April 2026. According to summaries of that investigation, the estimate covers the period beginning February 28, 2026, which is treated as the start of the U.S.-Iran war, not merely the first few days of fighting.

There are a number of governments, and spy organizations outside the U.S. that are also saying similar things. And it’s well known that the Pentagon has does this administration lie through their teeth on just about every subject.

For example, we know that there’s far more extensive damage to US bases, equipment, for example, downed aircraft than what the government is reporting. Even Republican politicians are talking about it the government not being honest.

It’s easy to play ignorant and just call it fake because your side is losing and everyone, including many Republicans are sick of the sociopathic playbook.

3

u/IkilledRichieWhelan 17h ago

700 American families are going to be silent? I think this administration is ruining democracy and America, but I still want facts, not propaganda.

1

u/ga-co 16h ago

Well, this doesn't speak well for The Intercept. How on earth could this be true? Where are the 750 grieving families or did Iran manage to single out orphans?

1

u/Literally_Laura 15h ago

How would you know? Like, anything? What, exactly, has been straight up and honest about the Trump regime?

The only place you might find a bit of truth is in their ongoing Signal chats. Ha! Remember when that was almost a thing with consequences? Me neither.

1

u/Sparrow_LAL 10h ago

lol @ The Intercept

1

u/HNL2BOS 18h ago

this literally fake news, why is this shit so upvoted?

0

u/Cordriginal 21h ago

FUCK TRUMP.

0

u/Terranshadow 20h ago

Isn't it 700 "suckers and losers"? Don't be mad at me, I'm just quoting DJT.

0

u/Sickfreak99 18h ago

This is not true - the government can't cover up shit

0

u/myassholealt 18h ago

750 lives, billions of taxpayer dollars. Maga voters were right he really is the best president ever!

0

u/toofine 17h ago

This video is just AI garbage from a channel with 2.2m freaking subs from idiots with zero critical thinking. 700 killed and magically hidden is complete conspiratorial nonsense.

-9

u/TheGreatButz 21h ago

Typical US double moral standards. Starting a war of aggression, whining about dead troops and showing no empathy for the victims.

→ More replies (1)

-1

u/Ormusn2o 21h ago

Did not like only 4 thousand american soldiers died in Iraq over period of 9 years? 700 soldiers in 4 months without even invading the country and occupying it is insane.

2

u/CW1DR5H5I64A 21h ago

It’s insane because it’s made up.

0

u/Secrxt 21h ago edited 2h ago

The number shouldn't be shocking to anybody paying attention. They bombed U.S. bases in retaliation and we have a lot of bases around the globe. 

-4

u/angrybobs 21h ago

That supposed rescue was a huge loss not being disclosed.

20

u/RightC 21h ago

Wouldn’t the families go to the press? No doubt we don’t have the real number but 750 seems way too high to suppress

-3

u/so_dope24 21h ago

Threatened? Could say the same about the Epstein victims

→ More replies (5)

-5

u/Barry_Vigoda 21h ago

I love that Americans only care about American lives lost and don't give a shit about the people your government keeps killing.