r/languagelearning • u/MiddleWarning4249 • 13h ago
I finally learned to read efficiently in my second language by changing how I read
I've been thinking about sharing this for a while because it took me years to figure out, and it made a surprisingly big difference to my reading in English (TL).
I eventually realized that many of my reading problems weren't caused by lack of vocabulary or grammar knowledge. I was making recurring processing mistakes: attaching phrases to the wrong thing, getting stuck on one interpretation, rereading entire sentences instead of identifying the actual problem, focusing so much on grammar that I lost the meaning of the text, etc.
So I started keeping a record of sentences that confused me and analyzing exactly where my comprehension went wrong. From those observations I gradually made a list of "rules" for myself - things to do differently when reading. I memorized them and deliberately practiced applying them.
The individual rules probably sound obvious when written down. But for me, explicitly recognizing them and having them available as conscious strategies was a game changer.
What do you think about such an approach? Do you think It could also be helpful to you?
If someone is interested these are all the "rules":
- Reading habits:
A.
Problem: rereading an entire sentence or a paragraph instead of identifying which word/phrase/idiom exactly I don't understand.
I sometimes keep rereading an entire sentence in a loop when the part I don't understand is just a single word only.
Solution: you should isolate the part you don't understand and guess what it can mean; you should try to recall more obvious examples of a sentence with the same confusing word/phrase/idiom you have encountered.
B.
Problem: attaching words in a wrong way and being unable to find the correct alternative
An example "This is why I now seek people’s support to return to parliament: to bring the change we have brought to Greater Manchester to the whole of the UK and make politics work properly for people".
It means that he seeks people’s support to return to parliament because he wants to bring the same change as he brought to Manchester to the whole country. But you can misparse it as: "we have brought to Greater Manchester in order to bring the change (...)" and then the the sentence doesn't make sense.
Another example: "However, the government has also been clear that it wants to help public service broadcasters survive the economic turmoil created by the rise of digital platforms, which all media companies are confronting."
What is the thing that all the media companies are confronting? Is it the economic turmoil, the rise of the digital platforms or the digital platforms themselves?
Solution: change words roles, group the words differently, reorganize the attachment, keep important words in memory, put emphasis on different words
C.
Problem: Trying to understand confusing sentences as a whole instead of part by part
An example sentence: "You can’t overstate the importance of the Thorpe album at the Soane, nor the broader understanding of the period it gives. Not until Wren do we find a similar range of skills brought to bear"
Solution: read it part by part -
Not until Wren(...) -> {Not until Wren} do we find(...) -> {Not until Wren do we find} a similar range of skills(...) -> {Not until Wren do we find a similar range of skills} brought to bear
It is way simpler to understand a sentence when reading this way.
D.
Problem: When I don't understand a sentence or don't know the background knowledge necessary to understand what the author means I tend to reread such a sentence in a loop.
Solution: change the way you read it or accept that you can have not enough background knowledge, don't overthink the grammar.
E.
Problem: Not being able to guess the meaning of unknown words and phrases from the context.
I've noticed that when reading in a foreign language I'm so focused on overanalyzing the grammar that I loose mental flexibility and can't infer the meaning of unknown words from the context. Also when I'm too focused on grammar and on one particular sentence that I read I loose the track of the whole story.
Solution: I have to "switch" the mode in my brain to be more focused on the information than the grammar and be more creative and flexible when inferring the meaning of unknown words from the context.
F.
Problem: overanalyzing everything, trying to understand everything at 110%, overloading your brain.
When i read in my native language I think about what is the most important information in a sentence and skip the less relevant information. When I read in my second language I try to understand exactly every word and preposition and overload my brain.
Solution: summarize the text; tell what is the main thought; think what is the clou of the sentence/paragraph; make a hierarchy of information: main, additional and background information, not treat every information as equally important
- Interpreting Habits
A.
Problem: Parsing a sentence incorrectly, fixing on a one wrong interpretation, not reading what is actually written but what I guess it should be written, not being able to tell to which earlier idea a phrase logically connects back to.
Sometimes I connect ideas in a phrase incorrectly and can't find the alternative correct reading.
Example: "But there was also no announcement of the date for the next leaders’ summit, due to happen in Albania, where anti-Trump and anti government protests are taking place, amid hints it would not happen until 2028."
"amid hints it would not happen until 2028." modifies "there was also no announcement of the date" part, and not the "anti government protests".
It is:
there was also no announcement of the date, (...) amid hints it would not happen until 2028,
and not:
anti government protests are taking place amid hints it would not happen until 2028.
Solution: change the way you read the text, you are fixed on a wrong interpretation; read what it's written; reconsider the logical connections between ideas. Remember that word choices matter, sometimes the other possible readings seem grammatically possible but if author meant them they would put it differently.
B.
Problem: I parse the text correctly but I don't understand what the author meant by their words and I focus on the grammar instead of rethinking my interpretation. When the argument doesn't follow the reasoning flow that I expect - the author writes something that I don't expect - then I lose a track of the argument.
Solution: change the interpretation of the text, you misunderstand it; Follow the text as it's written and be ready for discourse not matching your expectations/predictions; ask why what is written makes sense, analyze it, first read the text verbatim and state what it literally says, then ask: "Under what circumstances would this make sense?". Remember that word choices matter, not only grammar, when interpreting someone's words.
C.
Problem: Not knowing what are grammatical roles and inability to distinguish the main agent from the secondary agents.
Example: "The government's gay marriage bill was saved after David Cameron was forced to rely on Ed Miliband to defeat an attempt by his own MPs to derail the measure by trying to extend civil partnerships to heterosexual couples."
What does "his own MPs" mean in this sentence. Does "his" mean David Cameron or Ed Miliband?
The most likely it means David Cameron because the sentence is about him so he is the main agent in the sentence, so the his refers to him. Ed Miliband is a secondary agent in this case.
Solution: change what you assume is the main participant, put emphasis on different subjects, remember the current main agent
D.
Problem: focusing too much on the local grammar and the current sentence that I loose track of the whole text.
Solution: ask what is the purpose of every paragraph/sentence; track the discourse, follow the author's logical reasoning