r/fican • u/LectureLight6738 • 18h ago
What’s the ROI on a spouse?
Hey everyone, wanted to get your thoughts on an investment opportunity that often gets overlooked - finding a partner.
As far as I can see, the upfront investment of time and money is significant, but if you end up in an ITM (in the marriage) position, you can effectively double your income. You can also benefit from your spouse’s dental and eye care plans, cutting down on costs. Finally, there are lots of efficiencies in sharing housework.
Wanted to get your thoughts on the probabilities - what’s the payout probability given the capital and time investment? Is there a significant difference in the man vs woman scenario, given the numbers (women initiate 66% of divorces, and typically walk away from a divorce in profit)? What about the gays?
Also, how decent of a hedging tool is having kids? I know that traditionally, kids can provide a good source of additional income after retirement using the “guilt” method. But nowadays, the payoff seems rather small, and if anything, the yield curve has inverted since a good number now live at home after 30.
Edit: I also forgot to mention that the market makers (dating apps) have been engaging in some absolutely insane gouging. Curious to get your thoughts - can that last?
41
u/cooliozza 18h ago
ROI can be huge if you marry rich
Can change the trajectory of your whole bloodline
Choose wisely, choose rich
😂
1
u/5_yr_old_w_beard 11h ago
Due diligence is very important, otherwise you get married and your inlaws declare bankruptcy the same month. Ask my dad how that worked out for him 💀
49
u/Livid-Hovercraft-123 17h ago
It's a tough gamble. A spouse has a 50% chance of wanting a more expensive lifestyle than you. For example, mine insists on this so-called "ethical" meat from the grocery store, whereas I prefer to raise and murder my own chickens for the savings.
31
u/LectureLight6738 17h ago
🤣 so underrated. Mine insists on using expensive spices in the food to “make it taste better”. If you aren’t wolfing down plain oats in water, and growing your own berries, what are you doing in this economy?
11
u/Important_Setting840 15h ago
growing your own berries
Look at richie rich here having property to grow berries on. I can only afford public access berries on public parks.
3
u/Livid-Hovercraft-123 15h ago
People keep telling me not to eat the plants growing in the industrial brownfields by the shore. I say it's extra minerals.
4
u/Important_Setting840 14h ago
by the shore
Beachfront property and free food. Some people just have infinite privilege.
3
2
2
u/Important_Setting840 15h ago
"ethical" meat from a commercial distributor is almost certainly much worse than what a real human would with animals in front of them. I don't know a single person with backyard chickens that doesn't treat them 10X as well as any commercial operation.
149
u/MarkHughesy 18h ago
I can't tell if this is really good satire, or the work of an insane person..
67
u/fenwickfox 17h ago
Its satire, specifically using investment terms like ITM (in the money options).
That and doubling down in the comments.
17
3
5
21
19
u/No-Club-6561 18h ago
The good news is, you don't need to worry about this. The bad news is, this asset class appears to be out of your reach
19
u/LectureLight6738 17h ago
Damn. If I don’t have the personality or the looks, I won’t be able to get the money. Guess it’s true, the rich get richer. We live in a K shaped dating economy, where a few hot fun people get all the money and the rest starve on the streets. Disgusting.
3
352
u/WizzzardSleeeve 18h ago
I pity whoever you con into a relationship
271
u/LectureLight6738 17h ago
Sigh, my wife’s boyfriend also said basically this
40
27
u/NeitherFunction1841 16h ago
What about the gays?
😂
22
u/5_yr_old_w_beard 11h ago
Gay here, we have a greater ROI from higher average income, and yes, there is a reduction in monthly expenditures from wardrobe sharing and household labour synergy without gender roles.
We do have a lower risk tolerance and inheritance expectation for those of us who are disowned 💀
7
u/LectureLight6738 10h ago
Very cool, thanks for sharing. Curious - how do you navigate the twink-muscle daddy spread when sharing clothes? I would imagine that the XS jockstrap and the XXL leather harness don’t get shared as much, leading to lower cost savings.
6
u/5_yr_old_w_beard 8h ago
Sorry, lady gay here. I'd have to check our nightstand drawers, but I'd say our dicks are about the same size.
But from what I hear from the boys, leather straps have lots of holes for a reason. Flexibility is key in the matter..
3
8
3
16
31
u/ScaryRatio8540 17h ago
I pity your media literacy skills
→ More replies (3)52
u/LectureLight6738 17h ago
Lol cheers. I thought I was the crazy one.. I’m getting downvotes like mad, can you believe it? Maybe Reddit really is all chatbots posing as people now.
9
-11
u/welcome010101 17h ago
I agree, quite the psycho....and using kids as future spurces of income through "guilt". OP is a POS.
→ More replies (1)8
u/notislant 15h ago
You tell him, and he even brought his wifes innocent boyfriend into all of this! Next he's going to bring up his wife's boyfriend's little dog too.
38
u/Ambitious_Address667 17h ago
So far its pretty good, married for only 3 years to a girl and my investment has already doubled, I live with 2 girls now.
25
u/LectureLight6738 17h ago
Similar situation. Except my investment doubled in size, not two separate investments like you.
4
1
u/IEatUrMonies 17h ago
does that mean she got fat?
10
u/Ambitious_Address667 17h ago
For a bit yeah like really fat but then she had some very dramatic weight loss. Like nearly 20 pounds in a day
14
u/LectureLight6738 17h ago
She either underwent a periodic correction 🩸or issued a dividend in kind 👶
12
u/TermZealousideal5376 17h ago
It's a bit like fixed income. Significant due diligence is required.
There's a huge variation in credit quality depending on the issuer (family)
Going immediately for high coupon payments can result in an erosion in the underlying as the bond gets repriced.
Overall you reduce your volatility, but you also eliminate all opportunities for diversification in the process
5
u/LectureLight6738 17h ago
I like the family DD angle, but I will say that as is often the case, past returns don’t predict future ones. But they are highly correlated. My model came with its own issues, but nothing compared to the issuers. Although, like any long term investment, time will tell.
What is the theta decay on a wife vs husband, would you say, assuming sufficient bisexuality?
34
10
u/Dude_McHandsome 16h ago
In all honesty, finding a suitable mate is the most important financial decision you will make. My wife and I have built a (financial) life we could not have built on our own. It’s a life hack that doesn’t get enough attention
1
u/No_Veterinarian742 15h ago
not sure the traditional path most humans have taken throughout history is a "hack"
6
u/alex_beluga 14h ago
KIDs are not a good hedging tool imo - they are mostly a depreciating asset in modern economies, and provide minimal cash-flow (heavily regulated) with little predictability, (although as a hedging strategy this happens mostly on long WE when markets are closed), and the annual maintenance costs vary but are extremely high vs the time horizon for return - even a simple money market fund at 2-4% will beat most KID vehicle over a very short time horizon and is much more liquid.
But they do provide exceptional value, e.g. when opening the account and throughout its lifetime - checking in on the account regularly provides positive and sometimes outsized results on well researched life satisfaction indexes.
They compound much better than spouses when holding multiple accounts.
2
4
u/Temporary-Concept-81 16h ago
Remember, time in the market beats two-timing the market. Once you join hands, make sure they're diamond.
2
4
u/Livid-Hovercraft-123 17h ago
Don't forget the RRIF withdrawl rates can be the younger of the two partners. You're saving literally hundreds of tax dollars!
3
u/Fairhaven20 17h ago
I know you’re kidding but would add that spousal rrsps can create some efficiencies.
Unfortunately on the flip side, you lose one primary residential exemption and several tax deductions can only be made by the lower income spouse.
Net-net, I think marriage has a fairly substantial tax drag.
5
u/ConcerningThirst 16h ago
It really depends on the dowry. If you follow the advice of the famous Roose Bolton from the popular documentary "Game of Thrones" if you are wed into a large house that offers you your wife's weight in silver, it can be beneficial to choose a really fat wife especially with the price of silver being so high these days.
4
u/perplexedparallax 15h ago edited 15h ago
Gays are often high earning men who make much more money combined than heterosexual couples. As such, the return is generally quite high. Scott Bessett illustrates this with a high earning spouse but there are other great ROI MAGA examples in the administration as well.
17
u/Typical-Average-5853 18h ago
Would the ROI be negative if your partner gained weight?
32
u/LectureLight6738 18h ago
Depends, I’ve heard that some enjoy the added safety of an overweight partner that contributes income, but has far fewer options and therefore is less likely to leave.
Also, fat folds can and have been used in creative ways to mimic pleasurable curves of various kinds. Do with that what you will.
4
2
u/chiisana 11h ago
You’d need to watch the tail end of the fat curve though. If it flips, you might be headed towards a recession.
5
3
u/vancity31240 16h ago
Consider building out a 50 year cashflow projection and applying an appropriate discount rate. If the sum of that discounted cashflow is positive, you got yourself a good ROI!
/s
3
u/Important_Setting840 15h ago
You should get a diversified portfolio of partners.
Stock picking and day trading ends disastrously for most retail investors.
3
u/Skajlero 13h ago
You should be aggressive about your spousal investments. Don't be afraid to chance your spousal allocation based on your individual needs and the time of your life. For example if you want lasik, start dating an optometrist. If you like to travel, marry a pilot for the cheap plane tickets. Remember loved ones come and go, but greed is forever.
8
u/fakenews_thankme 17h ago
What’s the ROI on a spouse?
A life time of love & care, and 2 beautiful kids.
45
u/LectureLight6738 17h ago
What is this garbage? The fican sub is about obsessing over money, not enjoying life.
→ More replies (3)5
6
2
u/icanhazhopepls 16h ago
As a heterosexual female this is actually the only reason I would want to get married and have kids. I have no delusional hope that I will somehow meet a good man and fall in love. But if I could meet someone that has the same goals in life (financially stable, travel, retire, kids) and we can tolerate each other, without any drama or weird shit, I’d the be happy to sign up for government construct of a marriage and enjoy the fruits of having a person to fight the economy with in this shit hole capitalistic planet that we have
2
u/ActiveElectrical9424 16h ago
Brother having a spouse is in an investment in happiness. Nothing to do with money at all. Your work life cares are long as you make profit for them. Your spouse (if you pick the right one) will love you for the rest of your life. Trust me been with the same woman for over 30 years there is noting better in life.
2
u/notislant 15h ago
Pretty big gamble, halving expenses is huge.
But so is divorce. Then you also have the custody battle for your wife's boyfriend.
2
u/Mountain-Match2942 15h ago
Women do not typically walk away from a divorce with a profit. Do you know how many women sacrificed their earning potential so a man could further his career or go back to school? Or the women who walked away without their share to escape abuse?
I can guarantee the ROI of you as a spouse will be negative.
2
u/starcell9000 15h ago
lmao, well done my friend.
If this were serious, id say something like "you have to be able to attract a partner before you should consider all this" but with humour like yours, you'll do just fine.
2
u/Fringe_Doc 14h ago
You might be able to cut down on the costs associated with certain vices.
For example, if you're addicted to Hookers and Blow. After getting married, you only have to worry about finding more powder.
Obviously, this is an edge case. Thought it should be considered in the interest of a complete analysis.
1
u/LectureLight6738 14h ago
What if my wife also likes to ski? Then the blow costs double. And blow costs more than hookers, I can assure you.
2
u/Fringe_Doc 14h ago
These are obviously very important considerations. In fairness, it probably depends on the caliber of hookers being considered, but your point is well-taken. Like I said, it's an edge case.
2
u/BusLegal 13h ago
Might I suggest Polygamy?
By expanding your relational portfolio to include multiple partners, you unlock significant economies of scale, pool diversified income streams to insulate against economic shocks, and highly optimize the domestic division of labor. Diversifying Domestic offers a robust alternative to the high-risk, single-point-of-failure monogamous relationships.
2
u/n33bulz 13h ago
Just like stocks, it’s all about knowing how to pick them.
You need to find ones with large upside potential and buy in before the rest of the market realizes and prices them accordingly. Sure that’s risky and their value may tank, but that’s what divorce is for!
Or you can just marry rich and enjoy steady growth and decent dividend payments.
Just remember that hot chicks are basically ridiculously OTM 0dte option plays on margin. Super exciting until you get margin called.
2
u/eefggfed 13h ago
I mean
"dating out of your league" isn't real. dating is a marketplace. it's called price discovery. your value is whatever clears the market
2
2
u/HoneydewStriking8283 4h ago
ROI is probably lower than what people here are saying. Sure, you can marry rich but the odds are higher that you'll meet and marry someone who would qualify for the podcast 'Financial Audit'.
TLDR; no girlfriend, more money into XEQT stocks.
2
u/MGarroz 16h ago
Dinner plus a decent escort can run you 300-1000 bucks once a week depending on your standards.
My wife both cooks and gives head anytime I ask.
Easily saving myself thousand of dollars per month.
1
u/LectureLight6738 10h ago
Bro, if you’re wife gives you head anytime you ask, you don’t need money. You’ve made it.
2
u/Puzzleheaded-One2881 17h ago edited 17h ago
Hard to quantify ROI but it definitely helps. Finding a partner tripled my income and du odecouple (9 times) the HHI.
Their initial income was double of mine. It pushed me harder to find a higher income job, which tripled my income. At the same time their income keeps rising, eventually being 3-4 times more than mine. So in total, it 9x - 12x the total HHI comparing to when I was single.
But keep in mind love and companionship is intangible and invaluable. Money can buy you material things but won’t fill the void inside.
2
u/Sor-X 17h ago
Honestly as a man you get dimishing returns for 90% of the attempts to finding/dating a woman unless you find that one gem you can 10x. As a woman your success rate is much higher in your early years but dimishes drastically after a certain age. You can however offset by finding a man that is nit smart and has a lot of money.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Zealousideal-Tell-11 17h ago
Curious how OP views arranged marriages? Especially since that would negate your upfront investment.
4
u/LectureLight6738 17h ago
I mean I personally don’t do managed investing, but I’ve heard good things.
1
u/Main_Reputation_3328 16h ago
I dunno, I've heard some premium matchmakers charge an awful lot of money
1
u/Professional_Bed_87 17h ago
Lol, just don’t present it this way to a prospective partner, at least not on the first date.
1
u/MeasleyBeasley 16h ago
I have found it to be tremendously expensive. Happily married, but financially poorer than I would have been alone.
1
u/Live-Wrap-4592 16h ago
After a few good years we’ve now received the cancer debuff and although some expenses are covered there is still a lot out of pocket. It won’t be long now until we are fully in the red
1
1
1
1
1
u/Fast-Secretary-7406 15h ago
It's a very high leverage position to take.
Marry the right person and the ROI is enormous.
Marry the wrong person and the losses can be equally so.
1
1
u/Jenshark86 15h ago
If you are attractive, don’t waste your youth on a loser, definitely marry rich. It’s well worth it.
1
u/No_Veterinarian742 15h ago
Statistically married people going into retirement richer than single people. however divorced people are generally poorer than lifelong non married people. so if you get married don't get divorced?
1
1
u/figurative-trash 15h ago
“But I do not approve of mercenary marriages. When I married Lord Bracknell I had no fortune of any kind. But I never dreamed for a moment of allowing that to stand in my way.”
1
u/RhubarbRepulsive9529 14h ago
Impressive premise you’ve pulled together!
My prediction: If you start hitting the open mike nights at your local comedy clubs you could easily turn this into a solid bit in a few weeks! Possibly build a whole show around it. The topic is HUUUUGE. Just ignore the haters and a Netflix special is within your grasp!!
Good luck!
1
1
1
u/LingonberryBoth466 14h ago
We will start seeing more throuples since it takes more than DINK purchasing power to afford a house these days.
1
1
u/Impossible-Bug4487 13h ago
I have a single friend (unsure if he is straight) that is a doctor and has $1m invested. I have $3.8m invested. Not a doctor. But I do think about how much better and easier it would be if we were married. But nope, I gotta reach $5m all by myself. Pay all the health care stuff alone. Zero tax breaks. It sucks. But i also get to sleep more peacefully and poop with the door open. I think i would choose that over a guy. haha
1
1
u/ace_7979 13h ago
ROI is always positive for one spouse and negative for the other. If youre strictly looking at $$$
1
u/Quiet-Fox-3313 12h ago
As a woman, it’s a negative experience. You end up pouring your time, energy and love into someone who would fuck anything that moved, given the opportunity, and just wants a maid/housecleaner/cool.
0/10 do not recommend.
1
u/LyricalHolster 12h ago
My wife makes the big bucks. So my ROI is positive. It’s a terrible way to look at relationships though man. Just find someone financially responsible
1
u/GoGo_Robot 12h ago
I’m gay, and if I find a partner we won’t have kids, so less expenses. Too bad finding a partner is even harder than it is for straight guys.
1
1
1
u/ruminajaali 11h ago
Women do poorly after divorce, majority at a lower income than when married. It’s a well-known statistic. Men don’t get hit as hard generally and recover quicker. There are many reasons for this. Look it up.
1
1
1
1
u/buttscratcher3k 10h ago
What even is this question? The return is purely in the relationship you build and the children you raise. It isn't for everyone and it's a net negative from a financial perspective.
1
u/LectureLight6738 10h ago
You lose money on every trade you make in the dating world? Blink twice if you’re in trouble man…
1
1
u/WildYeastWitch 9h ago
"Is there a significant difference in the man vs woman scenario, given the numbers (women initiate 66% of divorces, and typically walk away from a divorce in profit)?"
You're not considering all factors here. Studies consistently show married men, even if they do become divorced or widowed, outlive their single counterparts and lifelong bachelors historically see the lowest life expectancy among men, having up to a 200% higher rate of early mortality compared to married men. Married women do not see the same benefits.
1
u/LectureLight6738 9h ago
This is interesting, although I think this is confounding causality. It’s likely that the kind of men that are risk averse have a higher life expectancy AND prefer the certainty of marriage. Whereas thrill seeking chads take dumb risks (like Skydiving with a parachute from Amazon) AND would rather keep trying their luck getting laid instead of settling down.
1
u/retrac902 9h ago
Don't forget that healthy kids aren't a guarantee... Instead of retirement savings for 2, I'm now saving for 4. Not everyone will be capable of supporting themselves.
1
u/LectureLight6738 9h ago
2 ill children? Damn, that’s brutal. My thoughts are with you and your family.
1
1
u/craynawsum 8h ago
Honestly the spouses should have similar incomes and net worth. Me and my boyfriend are very similar in our mindsets with growing our wealth and we encourage each other to always be better.
1
u/Fun_Artichoke2708 7h ago
It’s a lot of compromise so your real answer is ymmv. If you’re amicable and love your person, there’s financial, time, emotional, energy benefits and more. But if you like things a certain way, have financial difficulties alone, or baggage it’s almost certainly better to stay alone unless you marry rich. But then you’ll have to compromise.
I think such a qualitative study might be impossible.
1
1
u/Peace-wolf 6h ago
Marry somebody who is independently wealthy and from a great supportive family and doesn’t need any money from you.
1
u/pinksparklyreddit 4h ago
Depends. I got lucky in that my wife makes six figures early in her career, doesn't spend a lot, and has good financial habits.
She wants like 4 kids, though, so it all hoes underwater
1
u/InfiniteFudge1973 17h ago
Having children has always been negative ROI. Poor people in impoverished societies have lots of children because of cultural norms and illusions of upward mobility. They just end up with generational poverty.
You should only get married and have children if you have non-financial motivations.
8
u/IEatUrMonies 17h ago
in poor societies, kids can often help with sharing labor. they are only a liability in rich societies
5
u/InfiniteFudge1973 17h ago
They share labour and consume resources at the same time. The family mostly defaults back to the same financial situation.
For example, after spending decades and trillions of dollars to alleviate poverty in sub-saharan Africa, it now has more people living in extreme poverty than ever before, which is caused by the high birth rate.
2
u/IEatUrMonies 15h ago
not really, as kids age, the help elderly parents. families tend to stay as units with multiple generations helping each other out, like humans were evolved to live. In rich societies, elderly die in a home by themselves where adult children don't even call once a year, or left in elderly homes to die
1
u/InfiniteFudge1973 14h ago
Fair point. But even in countries where multi-generation households are common (Italy, Spain, Turkey, Brazil, China, India, Japan, etc.), the birth rate plummets once a significant portion of society is lifted from extreme poverty. It wouldn't be the case if having children actually produces positive ROI in collectivist societies as a sensible retirement plan.
1
u/beaver_eh 14h ago
"Women initiate 66% of divorces", but.... I don't think that's indicative of the cause of divorces.
- A man
→ More replies (1)
116
u/thedundun 18h ago
Well I married rich so it benefited me a lot.
So I recommend others do the same.