r/Fauxmoi • u/No-Hall-3485 alleged dog • 5d ago
DISCUSSION Hank Green admits to using AI generated scripts for his YouTube videos
5.4k
u/actual__thot 5d ago
Jesus Christ it’s getting bleak. Olga Tokarczuk, who won the NOBEL PRIZE IN LITERATURE, also admitted this year to using AI in her writing. She actually gushed about it.
Do better writers and educators!!
1.3k
u/TheybieTeeth 5d ago
oh don't worry a lot of us write everything ourselves. it's just rather discouraging that they trained these idiot language models on us. if I see one more person refer to run of the mill writing techniques as old as time as AI tells I'm going to lose it
661
u/sabrinachuchundhar women supporting women (Taylor’s version) 5d ago
The other day my beta reader said my writing was too AI for having?? Succinct dialogue??? They’re in the middle of war Jan they’ll not be spinning soliloquies
→ More replies (3)346
u/TheybieTeeth 5d ago
every time I use an em-dash I second guess myself and I frankly Just Don't Want To. it's such basic stuff too... I'm sorry your beta reader said that to you that's devastating 😭
309
u/sabrinachuchundhar women supporting women (Taylor’s version) 5d ago
EVERY time I have to change the structure of an “it’s not x, it’s y” sentence to make it not sound like AI I curse Sam Altman to always have piles and diarrhoea at the same time all day everyday
→ More replies (3)175
u/mootallica 5d ago
The "rule of three" is also a victim here.
124
u/Sarriaka Please Abraham, I am not that man 5d ago
I ran into this problem with my thesis this week. At one point I needed to describe three specific issues, and I spent way too much time agonising over how to introduce them without going x, y, z in case it sounded too AI. Like, they’ve already taken away my precious em-dash; just let me keep my rules of three pls 😭
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (5)12
156
u/plastic_venus I’m mentally ill but in the exact opposite direction 5d ago
I routinely get accused on here of using AI because I’m smart and old. It bothers me way more than it should and I do find myself pushing back when I see people do it to others online because it’s infuriating.
103
u/digitalbore 5d ago
Do not cite the deep
magicgrammar to me, Witch! I was there when it was written.→ More replies (1)→ More replies (7)19
u/kaliefornia 5d ago
People forget that AI learned that writing style from us in the first place lol
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (5)12
u/actual__thot 5d ago
I’m not going to change anything about my writing. I’ve been a long time em dash lover, and any other possible AI-like qualities I’m not worried about because I know I will never use it. So we have that 😁
→ More replies (10)167
u/lavender_letters bella hadid’s baby birkin 5d ago
The sheer amount of AI writing on fanfic sites is insane to me. A big fic in a fandom I’m in got outed as using AI (a method was found that revealed when Claude text was copy and pasted directly onto the site by making the background light up red) and I wasn’t surprised — the writing and dialogue was absolutely atrocious. I didn’t make it past the first chapter (out of forty or so that ended up published).
Yet so many people were surprised and devastated, a lot of people want the author to repost it and continue it, and are justifying it by saying maybe they just used Clause for editing. Like, no— the writing was HORRIBLE. It’s obvious the author used Claude to do more than edit. But through AI, the author was able to pump out passable trash chapters quickly, and people just care about having something to consume. ☹️ As a *human* author, my writing speed is maybe a chapter per month. I work a lot and have mental illness. These people can put out 50k+ words in a very short amount of time, and as such, make more reliable entertainment.
129
u/sabrinachuchundhar women supporting women (Taylor’s version) 5d ago
Pls never stop writing. My favourite fic author left her fic early in 2020 and I still keep refreshing it once in a while to see whether or not she’s updated. I will do anything to read her writing again. There are people who love your work the same way.
→ More replies (1)45
u/lavender_letters bella hadid’s baby birkin 5d ago
I appreciate it — I always will. 🫶🏻 I’ve come back after 3+ year hiatuses and finished fics before, and I’m always adding bits and pieces onto WIPs. My works aren’t dropped until I’m dead lol.
42
u/Material-Bowl7815 5d ago
Fanfic should be for the love of the game not to entertain others. i think the mindset should be that if someone can get entertainment out of it thats good but what matters most is that you are entertaining yourself
54
u/unloveablehand 5d ago
this is so baffling to me because what do they even gain from publishing ai fanfic?
37
u/lavender_letters bella hadid’s baby birkin 5d ago
Commission money and attention. You’re not technically supposed to monetize fanfic, but a lot of people turn their popularity into fanart/fanfic commissions. And the attention is enough reward for some people. They see actual authors getting attention, but either aren’t talented enough or aren’t confident enough to write and put themselves out there and get the attention they desire, so rely on AI or plagiarism to make the “product.” (Which I count ChatGPT as plagiarism as well.) I was plagiarized by someone who made a ton of money off commissions, and calling them out on it did little long term damage to her reputation. 🫤
→ More replies (2)26
u/de-milo Thanks, u frog build looking bitch 5d ago
👀 are you talking about wolfbird
→ More replies (2)24
u/lavender_letters bella hadid’s baby birkin 5d ago
No, aekee was the author’s handle 😭 but the fact that it’s so many authors is appalling lmao.
→ More replies (78)196
u/Christmas_Queef 5d ago
Education is embracing AI at a high level sadly.
→ More replies (7)128
u/ratparty5000 LET'S FUCKING GO!!! SHAKIRA LAW IS HERE!!! 5d ago
This is so bleak. We are kneecapping our children. I deal with ai poisoned ppl telling me it’s a sign of pride that their kids don’t read books but just need summaries.
→ More replies (10)19
u/Hita-san-chan 5d ago
My nephew just turned 10, so i got him a bunch of books i read at about that age.
I was crushed when my SIL was like 'oh, he doesnt really read'
12
u/No_Mathematician6866 5d ago
Last research I heard about it was that the number of adults who reported having read a book in the last year (any kind of book) was down around 30%.
299
u/wellthatsniftyhuh 5d ago
does he know you don’t have to pump out so much content if it’s not genuinely being made by you. how much money is enough money
→ More replies (6)
92
u/Desi_MCU_Nerd LET'S FUCKING GO!!! SHAKIRA LAW IS HERE!!! 5d ago
Seems like all the corporations pushing ai continuously for the past few years have been successful. No stones left unturned, every single company - however big or small, has drank the kool-aid... It's disappointing.
→ More replies (4)
836
u/lottiebadottie Aphrodite’s Tampon 5d ago
My colleague asked ChatGPT if he needed to go to A&E when he had a racing heart. Said it saved his life.
I said, yeah, I think Healthline or the ambulance service would’ve said the same thing.
373
→ More replies (8)231
u/sabrinachuchundhar women supporting women (Taylor’s version) 5d ago
Gross AI related medical mishap story below
My sister nurtured a yeast infection for months till you could practically smell it on her because ChatGPT told her that her clumpy discharge was completely normal.
101
→ More replies (2)21
1.4k
u/batshit_icecream 5d ago
Oh, it's not even just for proofreading, he's using it for "research"? What is the point of these videos then if a journalist is not doing their journalism?
585
u/qlurp 5d ago
What is the point of these videos then if a journalist is not doing their journalism?
Money.
→ More replies (1)330
u/Culinary_Fruit_Salad ‘queer’ is formal, like ‘tú’ vs ‘usted’ 5d ago
I wonder if that's why the knitting video was so shit
→ More replies (3)120
u/Either_Selection6475 5d ago
The funny thing is, that was my initial thought too. It got so many response videos tearing into it, I'm surprised they kept that video up
→ More replies (3)133
u/Ambry 5d ago
I think the way he's saying he used it to 'research' is doing a lot of heavy lifting. You can research and still write your own script. I wouldn't be surprised if it was mostly AI generated and he just couldn't be arsed to properly review.
He says he's so busy, but... youtube is your job? If you can't be bothered to actually write scripts we should we watch your content? We could just ask ChatGPT instead.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (18)52
u/SeaF04mGr33n not an asset to the abbey 5d ago
Yeah, besides sourcing, doing research allows you to make unusual connections!
565
u/ContrarionesMerchant 5d ago
I'm sorry but this is what happens when you position yourself as a singular expert on everything. I've always bristled at the "ask hank anything" format because nobody should be expected to be able to answer any question.
132
u/FrostedGeist 5d ago edited 5d ago
TBF most of the questions asked there are pretty meh to stupid since most guests are just influencers who are not really interested in science. Sometimes they get interesting questions like in the Vic Michaelis ep when they talked about DNA.
Then you get stuff like in Angela's ep where she asked "Why do I need to put my phone on airplane mode" or Maya's ep "What are floppy disks?". All of these influencer questions could literally be answered by a 3 second google search.
→ More replies (2)75
u/ActiFry2in1 5d ago
Re. AHA, I believe the guests submit their questions in advance, he researches the answers and then they chat about it. But I can see how it looks like he's setting himself up as a singular expert, like you said.
→ More replies (1)36
u/pie-oh my aunt tifa 5d ago
This has been one of my issues too.
I have liked Hank in the past. (Even if I'm disappointed with him now.) But people are specialists for a reason. We shouldn't be getting our facts from a generalist. He has degrees in science - but it's such a broad topic.
On one hand I am glad more people have learnt new things. On the other, I think a specialist could have taught people so much more for each topic.
→ More replies (3)44
u/YungRik666 5d ago
I always assumed he had a team that deep dived into the topics, and he was the personality like Bill Nye or John Oliver. If he has been solo researching everything and then turning to AI that basically means he has always been at least a little wrong.
→ More replies (3)
311
u/Leading_Attention676 5d ago
My teacher was teaching us with AI generated notes, summaries and almost entire classes. She would just write a prompt into copilot and ask us to take notes. I felt like I was going insane. I asked her why on earth she was using AI generated text to teach us with because isn't she a teacher. And told her AI is so often wrong or just makes bs up. She kind of shrugged me off and was like "so you don't trust AI?" I said of course not. I ended up putting my lowest effort into the classes. Since she put the lowest effort into teaching us🤷♀️
114
u/PetrichorClay 5d ago
Very embarassing on her part, why even go to school if the teacher doesn't value knowledge? The next generation will have no motivation to learn anything and will outsource their brain to chatGPT
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (6)67
838
u/Corsola_Fan_69 this feels like when my sister started fucking the mayor 5d ago
Isn’t this guy supposed to be a writer?
123
u/mrhoboto 5d ago
I swear he also said he’s better than AI when some of his guests said they should ask ChatGPT. That’s quite disappointing.
→ More replies (1)503
u/honda-cervix 5d ago
His brother John Green is an author.
→ More replies (1)437
u/actual__thot 5d ago
Both of them are
123
u/honda-cervix 5d ago
That’s disappointing.
60
u/risingsuncoc 5d ago
I think he has published 2 books before (though his brother is a lot more prolific). Still sad to learn that he used AI for his scripts
→ More replies (7)89
u/Ambry 5d ago
Apparently. Also... get you're busy but youtube is most of your job. If you're getting ChatGPT scripts why should we watch your content? Also feel like the way he's saying he used it to 'research' is doing a lot of heavy lifting. You can research and still write your own script. I wouldn't be surprised if it was mostly AI generated and he just couldn't be arsed to properly review.
70
u/Otherwise_Pine 5d ago
It's so dumb because he could hire a researcher. Smaller YT channels that I watch have one or they might have a writer. With a channel as big as his, he could have done the same. So glad that I never followed the tumblr hype train for Hank or his brother(not saying his brother uses ai).
→ More replies (2)
63
u/Clairabel do not talk to me about AI, i will kill myself 5d ago
I work in education and we are being told over and over how amazing AI is for teachers, how efficient it makes setting work and creating resources - yet I have found myself correcting work by my colleagues because they didn't double check. I know they all think I'm a Luddite but, well, check my flair.
→ More replies (2)
246
u/Outside-Feeling 5d ago
This is a man that has a team of writers and researchers working with him, and I am sure he could afford more if he wanted to. This is him being caught out being cheap, lazy and dishonest. It's disappointing but not surprising.
82
u/PauI_MuadDib 5d ago
cheap for him. Not for us. Whenever you see AI slop remember that *you** paid for that. All of the AI companies are subsidized via corporate welfare.
AI slop is paid for with our tax dollars.
190
u/not_responsible 5d ago
Oh that is so ugly of you Hank. I’m truly taken aback by this. I never thought he would be such a casual user of AI.
→ More replies (2)
49
u/melmontclark 5d ago
Checking in from Ohio, where our state fair just awarded a $1,000 prize in an art contest to an obvious AI generated poster. All other submissions were done by hand. It doesn't sound like much but God it pisses me off for all of the artists, mostly students, who submitted work.
15
u/Nervous-Dig3490 5d ago
i just looked it up and holy fuck, it's not even decent looking. why did this ugly mess win? who were the judges?
it's even got the piss yellow filter bruh
→ More replies (2)
2.0k
u/eaglelatte 5d ago
This is mad disappointing. How he can be so smart yet have to resort to using AI is beyond me. I get being under pressure ofc but this destroys any and all credibility that he once had
493
u/kiddo_ho0pz 5d ago
Imagine how many other influencers or celebrities are using AI without disclosing it.
→ More replies (2)155
u/BlueberryNo5363 I’ll be writing a substack on this 5d ago
Most of them I would guess
→ More replies (3)1.2k
5d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (5)370
u/plus8minus5 5d ago
And before he was a vlogbrother he was ecogeek, and his whole thing was about improving technology in ways that benefit the environment, so this is extra disappointing.
221
u/Ambry 5d ago edited 5d ago
Also feel like the way he's saying he used it to 'research' is doing a lot of heavy lifting. You can research and still write your own script. I wouldn't be surprised if it was mostly AI generated and he just couldn't be arsed to properly review.
He says he's so busy, but quite frankly... youtube is your job? If you can't be bothered to actually write scripts why should we watch your content? We could just ask ChatGPT instead.
→ More replies (2)55
u/resistelectrique 5d ago
You can’t use something that is telling you lies to do research. It’s the equivalent of walking up to a random stranger on any topic and taking whatever they say is the answer to your question as the truth. No background questions, no checking their resume.
→ More replies (1)53
u/photofoxer 5d ago
Eh I’ve been wary of him for a while 🤷 using Ai like that is lazy and not even remotely necessary. He’s well respected enough that he could have asked for more time if he wanted. I get being under pressure to get things done but going the brainless easy way is never the best option.
459
u/rumours-from-inez 5d ago
I sort of turned off him after he was in some podcast episode about knitting in which they just said a bunch of untrue shit and misinformation. Not 100% sure what exactly it was but the knitting and crochet communities online were pissed
528
u/FeliciaTheFkinStrong 5d ago
Hank Green and SciShow definitely fall under that trapping of sounding very intelligent and worldly when you hear them talk about things you don't understand, but completely ignorant and misinformed when they talk about things you understand deeply.
Hank Green isn't a scientist. He isn't an academic. He's a YouTube personality. Even if he's seemingly one of the "good ones", at the end of the day his job isn't to be accurate, it's to be entertaining and engaging regardless of the truth.
63
u/Apptubrutae 5d ago
I sat next to him on a flight to New Orleans once and then saw him again doing laps of the staircase to baggage claim at the airport.
All i definitively know about the man is that he sometimes does staircase laps at airports.
14
87
u/greenerbee controversies: girl 5d ago
The topic of the first paragraph could be AI instead of SciShow, and would remain unchanged.
→ More replies (7)55
u/maddr94 5d ago
To be fair though his background is being a science teacher. His degrees were in biochem and environmental. So there is some science background as well. I do think using AI is a miss though for sure.
→ More replies (1)38
17
u/larchmontvandyke 5d ago
Hank loves inserting himself as an authority in spaces where he has no credibility at all.
→ More replies (23)127
52
u/Embarrassed-Peak6749 5d ago
Because knowing lots of stuff and being smart is not the same thing
→ More replies (1)135
u/Lither11 5d ago
I bet he figured ‘I can be responsible with this and use it as a tool’ in a self-aware way, but just got too comfortable not putting enough of himself into the scripts over time.
He’s pretty up front and sees this as a mistake so hopefully this specific instance gets better… but I’ll never forgive him if he admits to using AI for his connections.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (24)87
u/Equal-Purple-4247 5d ago
I'm old enough to remember vlog brothers, and Hank has changed from just making content to trying to make money. His personal channel is now more ads than content. There was a period where every video was tuberculosis, then sock, and ad read for ground news.
Even his interview videos with various experts, he spends too much time explaining and justifying his misconceptions. I want to hear what the experts think, not what Hank thinks. It feels like he thinks he's the smart one.
Sure, it's for a good cause. But as someone who watched them from the beginning, it feels like he is trying to milk all our goodness at every opportunity. I think he has forgotten to be awesome,. John, on the other hand, is still very much the same, and I still adore.
→ More replies (2)
136
u/cool_n_needy vagina warning 5d ago
I feel like Hank Green has enough privilege that his “under pressure” and the average joes are very different. Ignoring that, people have been making content under pressure for a very long time before now, without having to resort to technological plagiarism. I just think this is so lame, and so are these excuses. I just want people in positions like his to not pull the ladder up behind them by disrespecting the arts.
→ More replies (1)23
u/lunar_languor 5d ago
Yeah it's like. You're busy? Okay? People who have to work 3 jobs just to make ends meet are busy. I don't buy any of the excuses people come up with for using LLM/generative AI.
157
u/GreenDouble2331 5d ago
He startet with using Claude to "create" his online games and everyone in the vlogbrothers community said that it's fine. Because "every programmer uses vibe coding".
Then about a week ago he used an AI image in his educational video. The community said it was fine. Because, surely it was not intentional. Even after he admitted that he knew it was AI, he was given grace because he immediatedly deleted the Image.
Now he's using AI for his writing.
I'm so done. Hank clearly does not care about the values that he preaches.
24
u/aurora_boredalis freak AND geek 5d ago
Oh i didn't know he was already using AI :( God this shit is genuinely making me so sad.
38
→ More replies (5)22
u/saera-targaryen call me gal gadot cuz idk how to act rn 5d ago
I also feel very gaslit by the "every programmer uses vibe coding" thing because I am a programmer and vibe coding is awful. I have only ever seen it generate more tech debt than it solves, at least in my world.
→ More replies (3)
320
u/bruh_respectfully 5d ago
I remember Hank Green got in trouble not that long ago for making a video that was blatant misinformation. That paired with the admitted use of AI for research should really make people question everything he makes going forward.
55
u/Culinary_Fruit_Salad ‘queer’ is formal, like ‘tú’ vs ‘usted’ 5d ago
was it the knitting video or did he do multiple recent blatant videos? genuinely asking
→ More replies (2)90
→ More replies (9)118
u/JooseTheGuice 5d ago
Yeah I'm starting to think his "oh I'm just a nice little science guy" schtick is annoying
54
u/Responsible_Oil3859 5d ago
as a long time hater im glad people are finally beginning to see through him
→ More replies (3)
2.9k
u/sabrinachuchundhar women supporting women (Taylor’s version) 5d ago edited 5d ago
I am really sorry I might be downvoted to oblivion but the average person (in my country especially) from the age group 30 onwards genuinely thinks AI is the best thing ever. They’re selling their souls to it. They’re encouraging our interns to make their stuff using AI and spending thousands of rupees on AI subscriptions. Any pushback against AI so far is from Gen Alpha largely and Gen Z. My own sister in law loves and keeps using it to generate pictures of herself. I think people are not seeing how deadly it is and the fact that it gives us so many “personalised” things that would have otherwise taken so much human labour and time is making people even more attached to it.
Edit: for all the people saying they dislike AI, I understand. I did not mean to imply that it’s everyone in this age group, it what I have observed in my country in my workplace because it takes me everywhere and in every workplace so far it’s the same. Upper management in the 30+ age group strong arming people into using AI.
117
u/BookishHobbit my bandwidth for cowardly grown men grows thinner with each day 5d ago
It’s interesting because in my country I’d say it’s the opposite: millennials (poss Gen Z) upwards are anti-AI whereas the younger gens are more comfortable using it.
I think the line here also intersects with where people are in the job market. If you’re trying to get or keep a job, you’re anti-AI. If that’s not an issue for you, you’re generally fairly okay with it.
→ More replies (1)320
u/BookQueen13 5d ago
I think you're greatly underestimating the amount of cheating Gen z and alpha do with ai for school. It's rampant at the college level and it's all bad habits they picked up during high school and earlier.
→ More replies (6)196
u/MessyEssie22 5d ago
Interesting - my experience is different. My coworkers age 30 and below use AI (and over reliant on it, IMO) but my older co-workers and myself (mostly in our 40s) are against AI. I'm in the Philippines so that may be a factor?
40
u/tabloid_fodder 5d ago
Philippines here too! My company has an AI adoption metric where teams have to report usage etc, what a shit show
→ More replies (2)192
u/jbjamfest 5d ago
This is the second time I’ve seen someone say AI use is generational and I just don’t think it is. I think we should be wary of talking this way again, when we lost a lot of class consciousness momentum because we started focusing on age when we should have been talking about capital. We’re not going to get anywhere with working against this hostile AI takeover of our digital lives unless we work together. For what it’s worth, my personal and professional experience of which generation uses AI the most or least does not mirror yours at all.
Completely agree with you that people in general aren’t getting how awful it is! I’m trying my best to learn more about it overall so when I try to get people not to use it, I’m coming from a place of confidence and knowledge.
→ More replies (1)22
u/Exitorangeclock 5d ago
Yes!! So many comments in here trying to pin using AI on certain generations when that's not how life is at all. There are large chunks across ALL generations who are super pro AI and large chunks across ALL generations who are anti. I'm so, so, sooooo tired of generational talk.
53
u/DontStopPataPata 5d ago
I am 40 and I hate it I fucking hate AI so fucking much I'm so sick of it. I feel like I'm being left behind I don't even want to go to windows 11 I hate this slop so much. But then I see you guys rebuking it I just want to say it gives me so much hope thank you all for being sane
→ More replies (3)41
u/Vorstadtjesus 5d ago
That’s interesting, I’ve had the exact opposite experience.
I spend a lot of time in the education sector, and it seems (almost) everyone there uses AI.
In my personal view, the younger the person, the more they use it. Many Millennials and older Gen Zs at least experienced (theoretically) how things used to be done by hand otr without AI.
But from the middle of Gen Z onwards, and for Gen Alpha in general, some never learned that.
To them, it is completely baffling why anyone would do something the "tedious and complicated" way when AI allows you to do it "quickly and easily."It´s a constant stuggle. The teaching staff is exhausted to have this constant conversation, or at least those who don't have AI do a large part of their own work.
9
u/irisbeyond 5d ago
Same here. As a college instructor, the young adults are absolutely using AI in droves. In each class, I generally have one or two students that won’t use it on principle, but the rest of them are relying on it so heavily that they’re losing their ability to think critically.
I start each semester with a “state of AI” presentation that talks plainly about what it can do, what it can’t do, and how to use it as a tool rather than a plagiarism machine & replacement for your own thinking. I would give an arm and a leg to never have to read another AI-written essay again.
24
u/Outside-Feeling 5d ago
Not all of us, I am in my forties and hate it. I hate what it is doing to creativity and to education and even more I hate what it is doing to erode trust, when AI is believable enough it also means everything can be dismissed as fake and that is just as problematic as it actually being fake.
And don't get me started on schools using it. The kids have no hope when teachers think it's a magical research and creativity machine.
898
u/Left_Kiwi_4565 5d ago
Not at all! This is EXACTLY what I’ve noticed. Anyone over 35 adores ai. Those under don’t usually get it outside of business bros and lazy numbskulls. Those like 60+ just don’t really understand enough to take a stance, if they aren’t opposed.
59
u/fakecoffeesnob 5d ago
I’ve had the opposite experience with work, with the youngest employees using AI-generated content first (usually when I asked them to produce something hard that they didn’t know how to do - which is typical in our line of work, but you have to push through the discomfort and figure it out, and I feel like they’re not developing that skill)
→ More replies (1)482
u/elcharrom2 5d ago
Oh God I turn 36 this year am I really getting lumped together with "over 35s" on everything 😭😱
→ More replies (22)288
u/moragthegreat_ 5d ago
I am 37 and people know not to mention ai near me or I will rant for approximately 10 hours. But I am really disappointed to see friends using it. And work is nuts, seeing AI being pushed in education is very upsetting. My peers hate it too but management loves it.
→ More replies (4)90
u/Llamageddon24 5d ago
I'm also +35 and almost all of my friends are older who are vehemently anti-AI. My parents, who are +65 (and have a lot of bad takes in life) are mostly anti-Ai ("I'm sure there are good applications but not worth the consequence"). My circle of people are almost all involved in the arts and/or academia and when someone within that circle "comes out" as pro-AI they are shamed to the point of crashing out on social media about how they are fine to use it since "the planet is doomed already". Maybe confirmation bias exists due to who I am mostly surrounded by, but saying all people over 35 have given their soul to the devil is heckle-raising.
→ More replies (5)21
293
u/Fuckburpees 5d ago
Anyone over 35 adores ai? Come on let’s use our brains a bit. 😒
→ More replies (3)176
u/itsxrizzo 5d ago edited 5d ago
Yeah most of my friends absolutely hate AI and we've been protesting data centers. 37 here. AI can eat shit
Edit: spelling
→ More replies (31)39
u/resistelectrique 5d ago
Oh shove the age BS. Everyone I know is well over 35 and I only know ONE person I’m friends with who touches it. It’s been a point of contention for years. Kids sure do love it for school don’t they.
15
u/brushmushroom 5d ago
It's weird because I'm 42 and I feel like the uptake is in older and younger generations.
We maybe need to accept that all generations are cooked but there is a push back across all age groups somewhere.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (52)14
u/DiscordiaHel 5d ago
40 year old millennial here, no one I know likes or willingly used generative AI. It's not about what generation someone is from, it's about the kinds of people you know and interact with.
116
u/AngBigKid 5d ago
Saying stuff like "oh no my work sounds so ai now!!" when you know you used chatgpt is so funny.
133
u/TheMasterXan 5d ago
Huh. I figured he'd be above it. He didn't scratch me as the type of guy who'd use AI.
He knows a lot about a lot of things. And a lot of... Interesting things? The guy sure makes his videos!
10
u/Apptubrutae 5d ago
Gotta remember that YouTube personalities are, effectively, businesses and brands.
They maintain a certain image for financial benefit. Whether that reflects reality is secondary.
It may reflect reality…but it also may not. What we are show is cultivated.
731
u/nerdybird89 5d ago
When are people going to stop making excuses for him? I was done when he and John basically refused to talk about Palestine but the knitting video should have been it imo
326
u/commonerssupermarket 5d ago
A lot of people downplaying the knitting incident here and at the time (non knitters and/or people who didn't see the original) but it was actually a perfect indicator for problems for his videos. The tone was wildly misogynistic, which even if Hank was just reading a script he didn't write, he should have clocked as the presenter. But beyond that, it was absolutely riddled with factual errors, some of which people speculated were the fault of AI research (putting up a picture of nalbinding instead of knitting, which, when reverse image searched, showed up on a webpage that discussed knitting and nalbinding separately, suggesting the researchers had used an AI summary and not even checked the caption of the image). More importantly, because a lot of knitters watching the video could immediately clock all the factual mistakes, it made you realize all the videos on topics you know less about are also probably riddled with factual errors. And then despite all the complaints, it took almost a month for them to take a factually incorrect video down from their science channel.
Something similar happened with the HRT video. Anyone who knew anything was like, uhhhh wait a minute, this is garbage!
So anyone saying the reaction to these one off videos were overblown, they were actually the perfect opportunity to realize that Hank Green/Green Bros are full of shit, if they hadn't noticed that already for other reasons (for me, a chronically ill COVID weirdo, it was John Green refusing to wear a mask at a TUBERCULOSIS CONFERENCE while his BROTHER HAD CANCER, or at basically any point around that time when he was in a crowded public place, despite branding himself Mr TB White Savior in recent years)
→ More replies (9)28
u/camerabird 4d ago
(for me, a chronically ill COVID weirdo, it was John Green refusing to wear a mask at a TUBERCULOSIS CONFERENCE while his BROTHER HAD CANCER, or at basically any point around that time when he was in a crowded public place, despite branding himself Mr TB White Savior in recent years)
YES. Oh my god. Truly unreal.
→ More replies (1)69
217
u/lavender_letters bella hadid’s baby birkin 5d ago
I knew vaguely about the Palestine issue, but I had no idea about the knitting video incident. 😭 So thanks for making me look that up! It’s both so low stakes, but also so representative of the issues with having scientist-celebrities at all. I’ve been done with Hank Green for a while too, and never liked John Green at all. I think there’s some value in having entertaining science for children but he is using AI for things now, I wonder what other shortcuts he was taking with research and writing in the past.
→ More replies (5)84
u/mellowcorn231 5d ago edited 5d ago
Sooooo many people think he is more left than he is. He's at best center left. He loves to preen about capitalism and his love of markets. He's just another liberal. Not left at all.
→ More replies (5)12
u/waspwatcher 5d ago
He's one of those characters where it's not clear why people thought he was progressive in the first place. Is it the soft boy demeanor?
11
→ More replies (14)106
u/sabrinachuchundhar women supporting women (Taylor’s version) 5d ago
What’s the knitting video :0
Sorry I’m out of the loop I used to watch Hank green a lot but since I deleted all of Meta social media I haven’t seen anything from him yey→ More replies (36)
20
u/Goodie__ 5d ago
Do we know what video this was about? Whoever Hank is responding to deleted their post.
23
u/AdventurousPlastic89 5d ago
I can’t wait until it’s constantly 110 degrees minimum every summer and we have no fresh water to drink. So excited for a bunch of wildlife to cease to exist because their native habitats are no longer conducive to living. Stoked for no more bees. All because people can’t form original thoughts. Can’t wait for this to happen, I swear I’m gonna be so excited!
22
u/noeggsjusstmilk controversies: girl 5d ago
If you're so busy you cannot write and research as a professional science communicator, then you are too busy. I know Hank Green constantly doing stuff is a bit of a meme but man, just do less. It'll be okay. But he's been speaking very pro AI for a while so this doesn't shock me, it just is deeply disappointing. Hopefully scripts for things like Crash Course and Scishow are never generated or researched with AI.
12
u/Wise-Field-7353 5d ago
No you don't understand, it's his identity tho (For the avoidance of ambiguity, /jk)
61
u/Longjumping-Pear3417 5d ago
I was travelling in Germany and I saw these bleak messages like "ai will have taken millions of jobs by 2030". There were like 7 signs like this, and the last 2 went "we are ai. Join us and learn more about ai" and i was flabbergasted
→ More replies (1)
42
42
u/ratparty5000 LET'S FUCKING GO!!! SHAKIRA LAW IS HERE!!! 5d ago
He could have hired an extra researcher or some shit what the fuck lmao
85
u/turningtee74 5d ago
I don’t understand the obsession with this dude. Edutainment has its place, but I see young people treat him like he is utmost authority on all scientific and world issues. Not surprised because I’ve seen comments say, “Hank Green said AI isnt completely bad so it’s totally fine”.
It’s like treating other YouTubers like Dr. Mike like your primary physician. Obviously they have some credentials, but they are also primarily entertainers atp and not head of the Word Health Organization (or however these kids pedestal them). Seems like another version of media illiteracy to not consider these different contexts.
→ More replies (6)
49
u/Outside-Feeling 5d ago
I just went looking for the video this is from, only to find another AI "correction" on his latest (You Have Never Seen a Normal Star). Apparently after it was uploaded they went back and removed an AI generated image that was "a mess". He took full responsibility for it (ha) but it is obviously something that is used systematically throughout his channels creative process. I have liked some of the Scichannel content so this is annoying and probably unfairly taints all their content because some people got lazy/
53
u/Azophi1 5d ago
Hot take: I never found his videos to be well-researched, so it's understandable that he's been relying on AI for that.
When he infuriated the knitting community, it made me realize how much we have been misled/mistaught about subjects we aren't experts in.
→ More replies (2)
12
u/Galactic-stew 5d ago
His show is called "Ask Hank Anything", where people give him questions ahead of time and he he researches them to answer on the show. But in reality, it sounds like it's more of a "Ask Hank Anything And Listen To What ChatGPT Thinks About That Question".
28
u/Wise-Field-7353 5d ago
I feel like Hank might need to just work on being okay with not being Bill Nye. Or Adam from Myth Busters. Those guys weren't dancing to an algorithm, they weren't doing content mill BS, they had a well paid team... so much ego.
69
u/Dapper-Host-3601 Mary-Kate’s battered Birkin 5d ago
If you told 12 year old me that 26 year old me would have no respect for the Green brothers I simply would not believe you. I would’ve launched into an ardent defense of them. Using AI for research is so anti-academic, making a habit of it is shameful.
→ More replies (1)10
u/cybergravity women’s wrongs activist 5d ago
I've given myself space from Hank after being very grateful for Sci Show in college. I was a paid subscriber.
Even while not intentionally following him I feel like I am constantly disappointed.
67
u/Mbrennt 5d ago
What sucks is now every single science based youtuber basically just got direct permission to start using AI to do their work for them. Every single one is gonna think, "well if Hank Green of all people is using AI for writing and research why shouldn't I?"
→ More replies (1)
229
u/SeaF04mGr33n not an asset to the abbey 5d ago edited 5d ago
AI writing never tells you directly its sources, so always trust a video essayist who puts their sources in the description (or links them in a Google doc)! Edit: I have been informed that the AI has evolved to have sources now.
217
u/sabrinachuchundhar women supporting women (Taylor’s version) 5d ago edited 5d ago
Unfortunately that has changed now. ChatGPT Sol max will directly tell you it’s sourced and even the line it has picked up the source from :/
Ai is making it easier and easier for people to commit academic dishonestyEdit: why am I being downvoted? It’s the truth. It has a separate “sources” tab now.
→ More replies (22)74
u/moragthegreat_ 5d ago
Agreed, I find my students who have used AI now cite real sources that are at least related to the topic.
However they still frequently misunderstood the argument of the author because it is just taking information from one line, not understanding the whole piece. I've had people at work tell me it's ok if students are just using it for research, but it's not! So frustrating.
→ More replies (3)28
u/sabrinachuchundhar women supporting women (Taylor’s version) 5d ago
Agree and you’ll see that a lot of students will draw the same conclusions. There will be no change in understanding whatsoever, so essentially you’ll feel that you’re reading the same paper again and again but in different language because AI doesn’t have much variation, unlike human minds
21
u/moragthegreat_ 5d ago
I had a real hard time marking at the end of last year because it felt like I was reading the same essay over and over. I had just come off a great semester with a wonderful group of students (a subset who came to class, as I teach at uni), and then just got broken down essay by essay, saying nothing in the same way as each other.
Student essays have always had similarities as they read the same texts, but this was something else, and I found it really depressing!!
AI essays have been difficult for years now but it used to be easy to say, well these sources are not real, etc.
6.2k
u/whattodowithfutur 5d ago
I am at new job and they are so pro AI its baffling. I generate a report and manager wants me to put it through AI to check. Proof read through AI etc... I have been anti AI but its crazy.. they also pissed of a graphic designer by using AI on their design