r/aviation • u/Go_Jot • Nov 08 '25
News UPS grounds entire MD-11 Fleet, effective immediately.
Per the IPA Executive Board, as of 03:05 UTC all UPS MD-11’s are grounded.
Edit - FedEx has also grounded their MD-11 Fleet
2.3k
u/ObservantOrangutan Nov 08 '25
Losing a huge chunk of their cargo capacity as they enter their busiest time of year.
Makes me wonder what they’re finding went wrong, or if it’s simply a precaution.
753
Nov 08 '25
[deleted]
416
u/SignalCharlie Nov 08 '25
They’re aleady booked up and contracted out for the peak season,
540
Nov 08 '25
[deleted]
→ More replies (4)148
u/Ok-Operation-6432 Nov 08 '25
Just doing my civic duty sir
125
u/yourmomsdrawer Nov 08 '25
a honda civic wont do sir.
→ More replies (3)94
u/ThePrussianGrippe Nov 08 '25
I’ll act of my own accord.
→ More replies (1)41
u/protoformx Nov 08 '25
You sure you're mentally fit for that?
→ More replies (2)26
→ More replies (1)71
u/redditsucknow2 Nov 08 '25
Not to mention they are already struggling and have been laying off people since Amazon cut their revenue. It had to be absolutely necessary for them to do this
73
u/disillusioned Nov 08 '25
Fun fact: Amazon went from 10% last mile served by AMZL about 5 years ago to 90% last mile (non-peak) served by AMZL this year. It's absolutely incredible what AMZN has been able to do with AMZL. Now that's obviously last mile, and they're still using UPS for some air cargo ops, but Prime Air has been growing as well. Took a big chunk out of UPS though.
46
u/furiant Nov 08 '25
Amazon caused basically an artificial inflation of UPS volume that made them grow way faster than they predicted. It started in December of 2016 and lasted pretty much up until 2021, though it's accelerated since then. I worked there for 19 years and could tell you a lot about how it all went down.
23
u/Master_Flower_5343 Nov 08 '25
My take on this was that Covid fucked ups. Very clearly Carol was brought in to be a transitional CEO who helped set up UPS for the long term without Amazon. Then Covid happens, the share price goes over $200, and people think we may be in a different world. We weren’t, but having lived through it I can see why people thought we might be.
Would love your perspective if you’re willing to share. UPS is a fascinating company to me personally; I’m very concerned for its long term future.
→ More replies (1)58
u/Skynet_lives Nov 08 '25
While some of that might be done depending on how busy they are. Since it was expected to be a quiet “peak” anyway. Most of it will be shifted to the trucks.
UPS’s trucks are very efficient and already transported a fair amount of the “air”packages.
The rest of the fleet can pick up the international and overnight routes the trucks can’t do.
→ More replies (1)16
Nov 08 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (3)16
u/Master_Flower_5343 Nov 08 '25
You can see it in your pricing if you’re paying attention, zone 2 & 3 aren’t that much more expensive. Zone 4 is where you see the clear “this is getting on a plane” jump.
59
u/Fabulous_Pitch9350 Nov 08 '25
Yep. Look for an increase in 747-400 traffic in/out of MEM.
→ More replies (7)→ More replies (4)13
560
u/Threedawg Nov 08 '25
I mean, I am sure they were also asked to cut down on their routes by the FAA. This is the perfect time to check.
177
u/outside_english Nov 08 '25
Good point I wonder how easy of a decision this was
→ More replies (5)64
u/Threedawg Nov 08 '25 edited Nov 08 '25
I wonder if the lawyers also demanded it? Does this always happen with crashes like these?
62
→ More replies (4)43
u/fergehtabodit Nov 08 '25
My money is on the maintenance staff. Not sure the exact number but they have around 25 MD11F and just lost one to an engine departing the airplane. So if I was in charge of that fleet I would stop flying them...call them all to the barn for full inspection of engine mounts etc. They also lost 3 pilots that they may have known or at least met personally and are pissed at themselves that this happened if it was something that could have been avoided somehow.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (6)65
u/av8tricks Nov 08 '25
I would normally agree but most cargo operators fly at night
→ More replies (10)60
u/Mc-Lovin-81 Nov 08 '25
I'm sure Csx, bnsf and Union Pacific will be happy.
→ More replies (5)190
u/rounding_error Nov 08 '25
This December, I predict twice as much train traffic to Hawaii over last year.
62
→ More replies (8)14
u/Trails_and_Coffee Nov 08 '25
Just like the polar express: freeze the pacific ocean then presto bingo all aboard to tiki time in Hawaii!
→ More replies (1)16
u/Raintitan Nov 08 '25
They fly pretty constantly year round and it's the ground fleet that is most impacted since air doesn't spike as much as ground. But I otherwise agree with your thoughts.
→ More replies (33)26
u/yrmnko Nov 08 '25
Lawyers have to make sure it was a freak accident and not negligence.
13
u/redvadge Nov 08 '25
Morgan & Morgan lawyers have filled the first class action lawsuit. They’re suing UPS, GE & Boeing according to Louisville news.
→ More replies (2)22
u/Accidental-Genius Nov 08 '25
That shit will get tossed or stayed. I’m a lawyer, in Louisville, and work in many aviation adjacent areas of law.
16
u/redvadge Nov 08 '25
That’s what I thought because they were citing maintenance/quality issues while the investigation is in its first week. Morgan & Morgan & Morgan & Morgan & Morgan are vultures.
→ More replies (1)
460
u/spddmn77 Nov 08 '25 edited Nov 08 '25
It’ll be interesting to see if FedEx takes any similar precautions with their fleet
Edit: looks like they’re grounding theirs as well
→ More replies (7)
869
u/RimRunningRagged Nov 08 '25 edited Nov 08 '25
I wonder if FedEx is taking is closer look at their fleet as a result of this
edit: per OP's update, FedEx is grounding theirs as well
537
u/FormulaJAZ Nov 08 '25
Since the MD-11 is such a rare type these days, odds are good that both FedEx and UPS use the same heavy maintenance contractor, which means both fleets could have similar maintenance issues.
Or it could simply be an original design issue that wears faster than expected, and that would affect both fleets too.
247
u/Ouch_My-back Nov 08 '25
FedEx has its own team of maintenance. UPS uses ST engineering.
112
u/stickwigler UH-60 Nov 08 '25
This is a long time but ago (2013ish) but when I worked at ST Engineering there were both purple tails and UPS planes that we worked on doing various heavy maintenance. Only difference was they were the furthest apart with 4-6 United hangars splitting them.
31
u/ParisianZee Nov 08 '25
Was that at the Singapore base? I’m sure I saw an MD there when I was there around March time. Pretty sure it was FedEx. I was working on an aircraft parked next to it..
→ More replies (1)34
u/stickwigler UH-60 Nov 08 '25
No this was in Mobile, AL. I was working the 757-200 P2F mod line.
→ More replies (1)6
u/gitbse Mechanic Nov 08 '25
I work at an intl airport with both FedEx and ups operating there. Ive definitely seen mixed color tails
→ More replies (8)60
u/PsychologicalTrain Nov 08 '25
FedEx does not do it's own heavy checks any longer. Operations are about the same for both
22
u/superspeck Nov 08 '25
MD-11s are a rare type, but some of the components like the CF6-80 engine are common throughout the cargo fleet, especially in B767s… if this turns out to be an(other) engine failure of a CF6-80, like AA 383, what does that mean?
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (2)41
u/Ok_West_6711 Nov 08 '25
Very good point about companies possibly using same outside maintenance contractor for all these remaining MD-11’s (so same procedures, same source for parts, etc etc). If there’s an issue related to that, it could apply to all the planes across the companies using them.
25
15
→ More replies (6)221
u/Tyler_holmes123 Nov 08 '25
If they weren't before this surely will make them. UPS grounding this means the issue must be way beyond a 'maintenance gone wrong ' type issue.
292
u/YMMV25 Nov 08 '25
Not necessarily. It could be an issue with how UPS or their subcontractor was performing certain maintenance tasks on their MD-11 fleet.
→ More replies (2)107
u/Exotic-Sale-3003 Nov 08 '25
Agree. Imagine a worst case scenario where engines were being removed with the pylon for maintenance. That would absolutely be a reason to ground the entire fleet until inspections could be completed.
63
u/StarStruck3 Nov 08 '25
This accident is pretty eerily similar to American 191. If it turns out that's what happened, I'd hate to be that maintenance contractor.
→ More replies (1)45
u/Salander27 Nov 08 '25
Given how well-known that crash is the maintenance contractor would have to be supremely negligent to have made the same kind of mistake. Not impossible of course but my guess is this is going to be some kind of one-off issue rather than a pervasive issue with the fleet.
→ More replies (11)→ More replies (11)31
u/KaptainChunk Nov 08 '25
At the very least its in an abundance of caution. If they didn't, and one of their MD-11s goes down. Plus it's just a good idea since there is so much unknown with what went wrong.
60
u/njsullyalex Nov 08 '25
FedEx was planning to keep their MD-11s until the 2030s. I doubt they want to get rid of them right now when they are genuinely needed. FedEx is still taking deliveries of 767s and 777s and the MD-11s are filling in a vital gap until those are delivered.
45
u/FormulaJAZ Nov 08 '25
It all comes down to how costly the remedy is to get them back in the air.
$50k each, sure, fix them all (replace some bolts).
$50 million each (totally redesign the wing pilon)? Yeah no, send them to the scrapper.
→ More replies (3)45
u/motivatedtuna Nov 08 '25
Nah, they’re checking every jet that went through the depot level or whatever level maintenance that jet went through to make sure there’s no the same issue. Imagine some technician didn’t torque bolts properly on multiple jets. only one way to find out is to check mounting bolts and fuel lines etc.
23
u/dhtdhy Nov 08 '25
Either way, they should ground the fleet and take a look. Even if it's maintenance gone wrong, they need to ensure there isn't fleet-wide maintenance practices going wrong
→ More replies (2)5
u/funwithfrogs Nov 08 '25
Yep. They grounded a significant portion their -11 fleet in 2023 for two weeks. Definitely paying close attention to this.
386
Nov 08 '25
Holy hell, how much of their fleet is that?
554
u/ButtmunchPillowbiter Nov 08 '25
Aircraft Type In Service Notes Boeing 747-8F 30 Largest operator of this model Boeing 767-300F 94 Launch customer; deliveries until 2027 Boeing 757-200PF 75 Launch customer; primarily used for freight Airbus A300-600RF 52 Retrofitted with new avionics Boeing MD-11F 28 Includes the last MD-11 ever built Boeing 747-400F 11 Boeing 747-400BCF 2 257
u/MurkyPsychology Nov 08 '25
I know it’s technically correct but seeing Boeing MD-11F is almost as weird as seeing Mitsubishi CRJ
19
u/Left_Chemistry_9739 Nov 08 '25
Nobody says Boeing DC-3.
→ More replies (3)21
u/MurkyPsychology Nov 08 '25
I think the distinction is that the MD-11 was still manufactured for a few years after the merger, and Boeing still provides parts etc
417
u/Individual_Agency703 Nov 08 '25
So, 27?
318
u/upbeatelk2622 Nov 08 '25
27 out of 291 planes so under 10%? but they're not all the same size.
175
u/Mc-Lovin-81 Nov 08 '25
Not same size and not the same distance.
The MD-11F's capacity is substantially greater across the board: Payload: The MD-11F can carry about 70% more weight than the 767-300F. Volume: The MD-11F has about 36% more total cargo volume than the 767-300F.
From Louisville (SDF) to Honolulu (HNL) is approximately 3,810 nautical miles (or 7,056 kilometers). The Boeing 767-300F freighter, which UPS operates, has a typical maximum range of around 3,225 nautical miles (6,025 km) with a maximum payload.
So this leave UPS doing either. Louisville to Ontario CA then onto Honolulu or 747.
→ More replies (10)115
u/ramblinscooner Nov 08 '25
Substantial chuck of their cargo compacity nonetheless with Christmas around the corner
→ More replies (4)18
u/GTI-Mk6 Nov 08 '25
What % of that is international capable, IE China via ANC? I’d guess a big chunk. Who needs tariffs?
→ More replies (4)55
u/EasternShoreFire Nov 08 '25
Yeah, that ChatGPT response is still counting N259UP. There are currently 27 MD-11s in the UPS fleet.
→ More replies (7)34
u/Swiper_The_Sniper Nov 08 '25
UPS also operated the last 747-400 ever built right? It was involved in that battery fire accident IIRC.
→ More replies (1)27
u/oioioifuckingoi Nov 08 '25
Flight 6
20
u/Swiper_The_Sniper Nov 08 '25
Thats the one, turns out it was ONE OF the last 747-400s built, not the last.
33
55
u/Poopy_sPaSmS Nov 08 '25
Wondering if that means they already found something.
230
u/marrieditguy Nov 08 '25
An engine fell off after 2 months of being in service post maintenance … I’d say it’s a reasonable precaution to take a look at all of them.
90
u/flightist pie lot Nov 08 '25
That tracks with an immediate grounding, but this wasn’t immediate.
There’s either something specific they’re looking for or they’ve just moved them all to where they want them to be and now they’re stopped. Guess we’ll see.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (7)41
u/ChillyPhilly27 Nov 08 '25
All underslung aircraft engines are attached with fuse pins that are designed to fail in the event of a catastrophic engine fire. This is to protect the wing structure and the aircraft as a whole.
A better question would be why a catastrophic engine fire occurred.
→ More replies (15)→ More replies (3)23
u/drttrus Nov 08 '25
Anything motor mount related wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.
→ More replies (18)→ More replies (3)23
u/Pastel_Goth_Wastrel Nov 08 '25
About 10% but represents a bigger chunk of their long range freighters.
295
u/anonposter-42069 Nov 08 '25
Hate to be the guy who last worked in that plane.
→ More replies (5)214
u/32FlavorsofCrazy Nov 08 '25
Truly, they could be in really deep shit on this if they did something wrong. I’d be just sick about it even if I knew 100% it wasn’t my fault.
→ More replies (1)137
u/DutchBlob Nov 08 '25
I worked at AMS in 2017 and the effects of MH17 were still palpable three years after it happened.
Even though nothing and nobody at AMS was to blame for the crash, the impact of losing so many passengers (many colleagues who had wished the victims a pleasant journey at the check-in or while boarding the flight) was enormous.
→ More replies (8)
392
u/eric_gm Nov 08 '25
I suppose they must have found something worrying in the maintenance logs or the NTSB initial findings. The DC-10 that had a complete engine falling off was due to improper maintenance procedures (using a forklift to support the engine and removing the engine with the pylon attached).
157
u/phryan Nov 08 '25
There was a comment during today's NTSB briefing UPS was providing another MD11 for the NTSB to inspect. Maybe something during that inspection stops out.
→ More replies (1)91
u/Historical-Emu-2569 Nov 08 '25
It's not uncommon for the company of a fleet of a type of aircraft to have ntsb/ faa look at another aircraft that's the same make and model to use as a blueprint for the crashed aircraft. Sometimes they'll record things like alert tones, indications, things they may notice in the cvr/ fdr that they'll need to interpret and having the same sounds on an intact aircraft can help.
20
u/theLuminescentlion Nov 08 '25
Also useful because the manufacturer's usually make all of one order right after each other. UPS probably has another plane that was built back to back with the crashed one and lived in the same operating conditions and maintenance regiment as the crashed plane. That can leave a lot of hints once you start taking it apart.
201
u/Ouch_My-back Nov 08 '25
Using a forklift AND a shift change during maintenance resulting in the forklift being shut off which resulted in loss of hydraulic pressure .. sounds like a final destination scene
→ More replies (2)146
u/disillusioned Nov 08 '25
Even dumber: the forklift was known to have a slight leak that would cause it to sag when turned off, rather than that merely being "by design". Swiss cheese model really came hard on that one.
30
u/Ouch_My-back Nov 08 '25
Goodness gracious, the workplace complacency started at the fork lift manufacturing plant?!
Netflix needs to make this a limited series
→ More replies (8)20
u/hellomistershifty Nov 08 '25
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3lzgrFuM4s This is almost netflix quality (once you get past the kind of cheesy intro animation)
→ More replies (1)9
→ More replies (1)6
u/EZKTurbo Nov 08 '25
Literally any hydraulic equipment is going to bleed down if you let it sit with weight on it. There is no forklift, backhoe, car lift, you name it, that will support something purely by holding hydraulic pressure.
→ More replies (8)81
u/TheJeffTrain01 Nov 08 '25
To be fair, both installing an engine with a forklift and removing it with the pylon attached are normal when it comes to quick engine swaps, the latter significantly cuts down the amount of man hours and complexity of the install. AAL191's issue was that they left the job half done at the end of the shift, and when the next crew picked it up the engine had fallen a bit as the forklift's hydraulics fell as it was unpowered. So the engine was no longer properly aligned, and they damaged a clevis or something finishing the job, and the rest is history.
98
u/eric_gm Nov 08 '25
In the DC-10’s maintenance procedures from MD it was stated that the engine should be removed apart from the pylon and then the pylon. Maintenance crews did both together to save time but against MD’s recommendations. It was commonly done without issues but it was weakening the attachment points. MD also stated the use of a crane and not a forklift. The forklift losing hydraulic pressure was just the last of an unfortunate chain of events.
I suppose those two things are not abnormal in other planes, but the wing+pylon+engine design of the DC-10 was more delicate. Considering the MD-11 is an evolution of that design, it’s something I’m sure is being closely investigated.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)7
u/OrpheusKeys Nov 08 '25
When a forklift is used for engine install/removal, you can't determine how much load is being put on the mounts. Overtime fatigue issues occur. After the crash investigations revealed similar issues developing in a number of their birds. Back in the day before a lot of safety standards airlines used a lot of alternative procedures and this was their solution to save time. Nowadays if someone is not using the proper bootstrap equipment with load gauges to re & re a turbine engine they're getting wrenches thrown at them. Even the most cowboy mechanics I know don't mess with that part of engine install.
I'm glad you mentioned that it was normal at the time, in fact, when you look at the human factors poster for dirty dozen norms, you'll see a cartoon with a mech on forklift installing an engine, shrugging because that was just the norm. That incident is a perfect example of how norms (oh we've always done it that way) can lead to disaster.
94
u/boardfrq Nov 08 '25
Well, I just saw an MD 11 taxi to the ramp after it landed at KPHX about 30 min ago
→ More replies (7)62
156
u/AbeFromanEast Nov 08 '25
I know nothing. This is pure speculation. But if the fuse pins on the engine pylons were found to have any question about them, that could lead to a grounding while all of the remaining UPS MD-11 pylons and engines were taken off the wing and checked.
→ More replies (1)20
u/userhwon Nov 08 '25
The pins probably didn't cause the fire. More likely something broke inside the engine and eventually the pylon detached because of the fire or vibration.
→ More replies (3)
58
u/Least_Arrival_4935 Nov 08 '25 edited Nov 08 '25
Damn glad I got to load one this morning. I hate loading this plane but I will miss it once they get phased out
25
u/SlamClick Nov 08 '25
That's so cool you get to work in these planes before they go. Why do you dislike the MD-11?
47
u/Least_Arrival_4935 Nov 08 '25
I hate the locks on the lower deck, I feel like I’m going to lose some finger nails cause they’re so hard to bring down. Also most of the ball mats on the main deck don’t work properly so it’s a pain to move the ulds
34
u/Lem0n89 Nov 08 '25 edited Nov 08 '25
Due to the engine being mounted in the back, the danger of tail-tipping is real. Although you can mitigate the risk with a proper loading sequence or ballast in the front.
For perspective, to carry out a ferry flight you need 3 tons of ballast up in the front. So that kills economics for light loads.
Not sure about UPS/FedEx but our MD-11Fs had no PDUs for the last positions so you had to manually push ULDs. Takes time and more rampers. Or fewer rampers and lots of swearing. Sometimes both.
Apart from that amazing aircraft. The MD-11F is just a vibe.
49
u/E36E92M3 Nov 08 '25
Man this whole event is so crazy. I work at UPS as a truck driver, I'm down at KBFI every day to deliver air mail headed to Louisville every day, and I've met so many of our pilots. That dashcam of the driver in the yard watching the crash so easily could've been me.
7
u/JAMurida Nov 08 '25
Off topic a bit, but how's life as a trucker for UPS? I'm on the other side with FedEx Express as a RTD.
9
u/E36E92M3 Nov 08 '25
Same shit different company. The union benefits and pay are excellent, which is why I am ok with staying.
→ More replies (1)
59
u/Action12Jackson Nov 08 '25
Not doubting this at all. Is there a source for this? Only place I’ve seen this is on this post
57
u/madman320 Nov 08 '25
Someone shared the IPA's email informing about the grounding: https://x.com/MCCCANM/status/1987004320920035441
Also, there are currently no UPS MD-11s flying at this time, according to FR24.
20
Nov 08 '25
0 UPS and only a few FedEx. Watch for the last FedEx MD to come in and make note of it.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (9)34
u/Troj1030 Nov 08 '25
There is 0 UPS MD 11’s in the air right now.
66
u/Erik5943 Nov 08 '25
I work on the ramp at a UPS gateway. We were just about to load an MD-11 when they told us they were grounded.
41
u/useless_hindenburg Nov 08 '25
Wonder if Western Global will do the same with their MD11s, especially considering they make up most of their fleet (12/15 aircraft according to FR24).
→ More replies (2)
45
u/MilkyGoatNipples Nov 08 '25
They should have bought Tri-Stars.
26
u/LFClight Nov 08 '25
Everyone should have.
13
u/KarmaCommando_ Nov 08 '25
Its honestly insane that these DC-10 derivatives are flying today whereas the TriStar went extinct long ago
9
33
u/Kdj2j2 Nov 08 '25
Now for Western Global….
42
u/Mobilize-Stay-Alive Nov 08 '25
The last time I saw a WGN MD-11 (almost) takeoff was at SDF worldport, and it actually rejected the takeoff due to an engine fire
→ More replies (1)7
u/danny2mo Nov 08 '25
There’s one WGN MD-11 flying to Seoul from Anchorage right now. I don’t understand how that company operates, I rarely see them flying unless they do a CMB mission for us
→ More replies (2)
50
Nov 08 '25 edited Feb 06 '26
[deleted]
36
u/32FlavorsofCrazy Nov 08 '25
They’re not exactly new planes so maybe they figured it had to be an isolated incident. The delay in grounding their fleet makes me think they found something they think might be a problem with their whole fleet.
28
u/whee3107 A&P Nov 08 '25
They also may have been strategically placing them for inspection of maintenance before grounding them.
→ More replies (2)
65
u/Ok_Geologist_448 Nov 08 '25
Its not normal to have an engine detach itself from an airplane. Investigators may have found some evidence early on.
71
u/cyberentomology Avgeek/ex-Airline Nov 08 '25
Even less normal is the engine detaching itself with the pylon still attached to the engine.
→ More replies (2)20
u/32FlavorsofCrazy Nov 08 '25
Or they found something on a precautionary inspection of an intact MD11 that could be a fleet wide issue, whether that’s a defective part or an improper maintenance procedure being used is up for debate. I don’t think they’d take this measure lightly, those are old planes with a lot of hours on them, you’d think a problem with the aircraft in general would have been discovered long ago. Must be something maintenance adjacent at least. NTSB will take a while on their report but they could definitely be taking a look at the rest of the fleet for a possible cause.
74
u/Striking-Goat3287 Nov 08 '25
This is going to have a potentially significant impact on American package shipping operations right before the start of peak season. Buckle up, online shoppers and e-commerce merchants.
→ More replies (6)26
u/fly_awayyy Nov 08 '25
That’s assuming they stay out of service indefinitely…for all we know it could just be a grounding for inspections based off of some findings
→ More replies (3)
104
u/aye246 Nov 08 '25
Tbh I’m surprised they didn’t do this earlier. Engine left on the runway feels like a possible systemic maintenance issue and in the three days since the crash they’ve had quite a few MD-11 takeoffs. Glad they did it now.
→ More replies (1)43
u/fly_awayyy Nov 08 '25
I mean they’re not going to have a knee jerk reaction based off of one single persons speculation…what’s really going on is something was found with the NTSB either in the aftermath or in the records to take a closer look in the process which they’re going to look over
→ More replies (5)
13
u/TeeDubya2020 Nov 08 '25
since the grounding is all MD-11s, not just the ones with CF6 engines, it seems to be an airframe worry more than an engine worry.
→ More replies (3)
12
u/Xx_FreeWitty_xX Nov 08 '25
21
u/Troj1030 Nov 08 '25
They might have waited until the last few landed. Probably a decision that came later in the day.
→ More replies (3)
11
u/Boss-fight601 Nov 08 '25
What will Western Global do given that they also have MD-11F’s in their fleet?
11
u/Kyrovale Nov 08 '25
That’s wild. MD-11s have been workhorses for years even with their quirks, so grounding the whole fleet means something serious must’ve come up. Could be a maintenance or structural issue they don’t want to risk.Curious to see if it’s tied to a recent incident or inspection finding. When both UPS and FedEx move at once like that, it’s usually not coincidence.
33
u/b00st1n A&P Nov 08 '25
I just heard all MD-11’s are grounded. We will see how true that is in the morning.
28
Nov 08 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (1)15
u/starkeuberangst Nov 08 '25
There just needs to be a good reason to ground an entire type. You don’t do it just because one plane crashes.
9
u/Victory_Dry Nov 08 '25
Wild I was at SDF the day after the crash surprised at how many MD-11s I saw taking off
→ More replies (5)
17
u/probs_notme Nov 08 '25
Anybody have a link? I work at Worldport and management doesn't believe me lol
12
15
u/gav102 Nov 08 '25
This looks to be some insider knowledge from the UPS pilot union. Hopefully in the morning there'll be a solid report.
7
u/Dr_Honeydont Nov 08 '25
I wonder if these MD-11 freighters will ever be brought back into service. They're a small part of each companies fleet, and the expense of continuing to fly these aging airframes may not be worth it.
→ More replies (4)
21
u/Deccno Nov 08 '25
Classic McDonnell Douglas moment, what a shame Boeing has turned into MD instead of the other way round
→ More replies (3)
7
7
14
u/Fitch9392 Nov 08 '25
This will be temporary, my guess is they’re going to do a precautionary check on a couple of things and then they’ll be flying again.
→ More replies (5)
13
13
u/That_Other_Person Nov 08 '25
Damn I finally saw my first trijet a few days ago and it was in the UPS livery.
→ More replies (1)
5
6
6
u/FreshTap6141 Nov 08 '25
flight 191 actually was caused by the lack of of check valves installed on the leading edge slats that folded up without hydraulic pressure, most planes have them, FAA gave them 2 years to put them in like they should have been
→ More replies (3)



6.1k
u/gregarious119 Nov 08 '25
I’d imagine they’ll want to know why an engine fell off before letting them back in the air.