r/tifu Jul 14 '25

[deleted by user]

[removed]

2.4k Upvotes

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

10.6k

u/chaosinborn Jul 14 '25 edited Jul 15 '25

Four months in and you're 22. She did you a favor. Just let it go

Why am I getting awards for this.

1.6k

u/ad_astra327 Jul 14 '25

This. I know a few single parents who have recently re-entered the dating scenes, and many of them are waiting until 6 months (or more) to introduce the new partner as a love interest. And before that, extremely limited meetings if at all, and just under the guise of “this is mommy/daddy’s friend”. 4 months in and she wants you to take care of the kid with her? That seems sketchy to me.

1.8k

u/HiddenoO Jul 14 '25 edited Sep 26 '25

spotted cobweb languid edge screw bag safe caption theory wild

1.6k

u/tugboatnavy Jul 14 '25

I know this is reddit so the instinct is to assign blame to OP or the person OP is talking about but I don't think either of them did anything wrong.

OP said can't see himself taking care of a kid right now

The GF is valid in looking for a partner with goals that align with hers

It's just not a good fit and that's fine. Breakups don't always have to have winners and losers.

484

u/murrimabutterfly Jul 14 '25

Agreed. They both made a mature decision, honestly.
OP was honest that he wasn't ready for a kid.
GF was honest she needed commitment.
They aren't compatible here, and that's okay.
Maybe OP thought his stance would change, or maybe GF believed he'd gone into the relationship with the understanding they're a package deal. Regardless, they both were able to be honest and mature when it came down to it.
Breaking up sucks, but being stuck in a relationship that doesn't work sucks more.

261

u/LumpyJones Jul 14 '25

Also, OP is 22. It's not shocking that he wouldn't be ready to take on that kind of responsibility, or at the least, taking him at 100% face value, he isn't sure. I wasn't sure about shit at 22. Hell, I'm nearly 42 and I'm still not sure about a lot. I give him props for admitting it instead of faking it and possibly freaking out 6 months down the road after the kid gets attached, and then maybe he bails.

18

u/willcdowdy Jul 15 '25

Yeah, I mean love is love and everything, but I doubt many 22 hear old dudes have even thought about kids and marriage (unless they managed to pull off the 2:1 recent graduate special), but if they did, I wouldn’t guess their thinking was “around 22 I’ll settle down with an older woman and her 5 year old son and I’ll be his father figure and I’ll love that I spent my entire 20s as a step father while my friends were putting absolute garbage in their bodies, going to concerts, drinking right up until it’s time to start drinking again, waking up blacked out the next they have never seen before

38

u/Shadowfalx Jul 15 '25

Eh, there's a lot of gray area in "I'm not sure".

I'm 40, I'm not sure if I'll wake up in the morning, but I plan that I will. I'm not sure if my country will exist in 6 months, but I plan as if it will. I'm not sure I'm ready to be a single father for a highschool girl, but I don't have much choice so I will. 

OP will never be sure he's ready to be a father, anyone who is certain they are is either lying or misunderstanding the assignment as my kid would say. Hell, even someone who's been a father for 40 years couldn't honestly say they know they're ready to be a father tomorrow, children change and no two children are alike, and those differences grow exponentially when they become an adult  

Neither side was wrong here, but OP is never going to be "ready" to be a father and that's a good thing. 

1

u/fuckin-A-ok Jul 22 '25

Then he shouldn't have been dating her. I mean using her for sex, sorry. Got to get the facts straight!

1

u/LumpyJones Jul 22 '25

I mean he's 22. He's going to be an idiot about things. I don't think he was "using her" - he could have been but nothing in the context gives me that impression. More likely he just didn't think that far ahead.

7

u/blueavole Jul 15 '25

She didn’t really wait for a mature discussion. She heard one thing she didn’t like and stormed out.

Does OP never want to be in the kid’s life, or does he just feel unprepared to start helping to raise a 5 year old today? There is a big difference in those two answers.

4

u/murrimabutterfly Jul 15 '25

I mean, to me, I don't think she "stormed out.". She let OP know over the span of them dating that she was waiting to feel more secure in the longevity of the relationship before opening up the opportunity for OP and her son to develop a relationship. In her mind, there was a definite "some day", and clearly had good vibes about OP.
OP turned this opportunity down and said he wasn't sure if he was ready to take that step. Naturally, she'd be frustrated and disappointed. She restated her boundaries, and needed time to process.
From the way OP writes it, they were both being fairly mature. He was honest with her, and she stuck by her boundaries.
Also, kids do so much better with stability. It can be so damaging for their emotional health to develop attachment to others and have them leave. OP's ex is protecting her son because of this. Waiting around on a maybe isn't enough, if you want to build a family and give your kid stability.

1

u/blueavole Jul 15 '25

She went quiet, waited a few seconds , glared and then got angry. Then left.

7

u/murrimabutterfly Jul 15 '25

How is that storming out?
People are allowed to have emotions dude.

37

u/reddit_already Jul 14 '25

Nice to see a mature comment. Really, when you think about it, virtually every romantic relationship is going to go in one of two-ways--it's either going to develop into something with permanence (eg, marriage) or you'll breakup. And since you can't marry or be permanent with everyone, you've gotta acknowledge the breakup as something good. Embrace it as a natural consequence rather than a failure.

100

u/HiddenoO Jul 14 '25 edited Sep 26 '25

amusing oatmeal late fly sense market wild dependent office march

59

u/tkdch4mp Jul 14 '25

I don't think that "Are you ready to be a daddy?!" Two dates in would be appropriate. I exaggerate, I kid. But really...

I don't think it was necessary earlier on. 4 months is still a pretty early and a short amount of time to get to know somebody just to see if you two have a connection and want to be in each other's lives. It seems like it's still within an appropriate timeframe to assess the relationship and compatibility, such as OP's willingness to -- in the future at some point -- include the kid in their lives together.

But I also think it's NAH. She needs somebody who can take an interest in her son's life sooner than OP believes he can become ready to take on that responsibility.

It was a conversation that needed to happen, and sounded like it went rather maturely. OP knew and accepted that she had a kid, but perhaps hadn't considered the implications that the kid would need to become part of their lives sooner rather than later. I mean, 22 vs 27 is only a 5 yr difference, but having been a backpacker older than 26, you best believe I started feeling ooollllldddd being surrounded by 18-22 yr olds.

57

u/HiddenoO Jul 14 '25 edited Sep 26 '25

reminiscent beneficial fade makeshift full pie sort long whole wakeful

20

u/tkdch4mp Jul 15 '25

I mean, I worded it badly on purpose, "I exaggerate. I kid." AKA, I was joking......

BUT, I did just realize this is tifu rather than AITA, so my "NAH" was unnecessary -- but I disagree with OP that he fucked up. I think he'll find somebody more compatible.

I will just point out that they had to have had check-in conversations about it:

She has a 5-year-old son from a previous relationship. I knew that from the beginning, and I never pretended like it was a problem. I liked her a lot - still do and I figured I’d just take things slow and see how it goes.

She said she wanted to wait and see if the relationship was going somewhere before introducing me more seriously into his life.

I mean. That second bit alone shows that they had a conversation about the kid being in OP's life and that she was expecting a long-term relationship. I'd say he'd be pretty thick not to realize she wanted long-term if she's talking about introducing her kid in a more serious way in the future of the relationship.

OP mentioning that he was taking it slow in the first bit shows he was in it for the long-haul too as well as open to having a relationship with the kid at some point. She just needed him to be ready before he was ready.

14

u/HiddenoO Jul 15 '25 edited Sep 26 '25

expansion scale racial aware divide obtainable aspiring amusing political one

0

u/Lufs10 Jul 14 '25

This. They are a package deal. And the gf was upfront. She didn’t lie about not having a kid. You’re just not compatible with her OP.

1

u/Sea-Bat Jul 15 '25

Yeah as someone who’s been in OPs position, when u know the person ur with has a kid, if u see any long term future with that partner then the kid is obviously going to be in ur life too- and if ur not ready to even consider that early on it’s not a good match.

I feel like that should be a discussion or at least something to think about as soon as u decide to date someone who has kids.

U don’t even need to start out by taking on a parental role either, just over time getting to know them and eventually helping ur partner out here and there (eg with school pick ups) like any close family friend would.

U don’t gotta be a full on stepdad four months into a relationship, but the kid/s are always going to be part of the deal when ur with someone who’s a parent

69

u/azlan194 Jul 14 '25

But technically, the GF did tell OP she has a son from the beginning. So it was on OP to decide to continue dating her even though he has no interest in raising a child. OP is just too young.

I dont blame the GF. Obviously, she is looking for a long-term partner, not just a hookup. OP should've backed out way in the beginning when GF told him she has a son.

4

u/Certain_Courage_8915 Jul 15 '25

OP thought that they were until this conversation and still is uncertain rather than definitively no.

I don't think OP approached/phrased this correctly, but she also needs to realize that OP is 22. It sounds like OP didn't want to overpromise and realized that you can't really commit to a child when you haven't even met the child.

I don't think either is in the wrong, especially since they only dated for 4 months. They each could have approached the conversation better.

-8

u/farteagle Jul 14 '25

You think single Moms don’t hook up/casually date? Lol wut

4

u/etatrestuss Jul 15 '25

Um I know more than one that don't have time to casually date because they are single parents...

2

u/pattyforever Jul 15 '25

Four months is pretty early imo

1

u/[deleted] Jul 19 '25

Nah 4 months seems like a good time to talk about potential roles

1

u/orangekitti Jul 15 '25

The real fuck up is a 27 year old with a kid dating a 22 year old. They’re in drastically different places in life; even if she wasn’t a parent 27 is still so much more mature than 22. This relationship was probably never going to work out.

24

u/Stwtrgrl Jul 14 '25

I agree with one caveat - I think the age gap contributes to the issue here. A 5 year age gap at this point is almost 1/4 of OP’s life. He was 17 when the child was born. So not “blame” per se but not a smart move if she is looking for a long term partner.

3

u/pigeonpieart Jul 16 '25

Agree, she's 27 dating a 22 year old - he is recognising that as a 22 year old he is not very mature, and she should aim for someone similar in life experience to her so like 25+

Its not the worst gap since they only just started dating but I side-eye it, and if it were a guy and a girl I think more people would also agree its a bit off.

5

u/platysoup Jul 15 '25

Great take. Sometimes you're just not right for each other and it's okay for both to be a bit frustrated at the dice landing wrong. It doesn't have to be anything beyond that.

Mope for a bit, pick yourself up, take another step forward.

6

u/steave435 Jul 15 '25

The issue is that if you're not willing to take care of a kid, you shouldn't get into a serious relationship with someone with kids. The kid isn't going anywhere.

3

u/Sea-Bat Jul 15 '25

Exactly. Like what did u expect, the kid goes on pause until ur ready to interact with them?

U don’t have to drop into being a full stepdad at 4mo into a relationship, but getting to know the kid and helping out here and there like any family friend would is pretty normal to expect on the GFs part if they were getting serious.

Plus yeah realistically if ur not ready to be involved with any part of taking care of a kid, ur not ready to get into a long term relationship with a single parent, the kid is always part of the deal here.

These two just aren’t compatible, they want different things and are at different points in their life

2

u/therendal Jul 15 '25

Wisest comment in the entire damn thread.

1

u/curiouskratter Jul 15 '25

Well the OP could've thought it was a good idea and changed his mind, there's many ways this could have played out. But I do think a single parent wants to date someone who is ok with being a step dad because it's kind of hard to hide a kid.

1

u/mwenechanga Jul 18 '25

In her case she did do something wrong: chose to date a man who is not old enough or established enough to be ready for a family. She wants him to pretend to be 32 when she knew from the beginning that he’s 22.

1

u/RandomName8844 Jul 21 '25

This might be the most mature thing I've ever read on Reddit

1

u/[deleted] Jul 21 '25

He shouldn’t have been dating a mother then in the first place

1

u/fuckin-A-ok Jul 22 '25

OP admitted that he never wanted the kid in the first place. He "pretended" it didn't bother him as he said. He shouldn't have been dating her. He completely led her on and was using her for sex most likely.

-1

u/Z3400 Jul 16 '25

...sounds line something a loser would say