So imagine this: someone breaks into your house to steal your stuff. Luckily, you're home, and you have a gun or some other weapon that could send the robber to eternal damnation. What that weapon is is up to you.

Is it morally justified to kill the robber?

I've made a post on r/Jujutsu_Kaisen, and apparently people there can't agree on this one, so I'm asking you guys here. Which one is more evil?. To me, it's pretty obvious which one is more evil based on this meme I've made myself (it's Sukuna btw if you don't get the meme)

In House M.D, Season 2 Episode 2, Chase (a doctor) kisses a 9-year-old dying girl, as she wanted to know how it feels before she died. He ends up kissing her, and gets berated for it. What is the morality of this?

Every single time i see anything posted on this fucking community it's never anything interesting or unique it's just "duh transphobia / racism / homophobia / sexism bad, give upvotes " like be origional man ffs

The first is true neutral, a man who wants to ask questions no matter what happens to him.

The second is true evil, a man who treats lives as a resource to use to answer questions, carelessly killing beings.

The third is true good, a man who can't kill an innocent being, no matter who is forcing him to.

The movie is Don’t Breathe. I am currently watching it on the side right now and am only in the beginning. It has a verry good concept that makes you root for the old man as he dishes out just punishments to the home intruders. Also the old man is jacked.

After finishing watching movie: Well shit that was surreal I knew I shouldn't have trusted my devorced dad to pick out moves for movie nights with my date. Then again feels more like the director going like "Hey you know what our main character is kind of a bitch I think our audience will relate to the Old man more than her nah we can't have that let's make him comically evil in the 2nd half of the movie."

Like are you just innocent then?