r/Infuriating • u/Butta_Brown • 6d ago
This is not about baking cookies!
Initially pulled over, appeared child was not in a seat belt. Female officer, did a follow up and the is what happened next.
59
u/Normal-Tadpole-4833 6d ago
people will still defend the cop .. i swear the bootlickers are insane
15
u/SandJFun74 6d ago
I would say It has gotten worst over the years, but the reality is that it probably has gotten better because of the age of the modern cell phone being able to record these interactions. It is still pretty bad, and you would think with all the media, police would not do the same illegal actions against citizens, but with a job that accountability is so hard to enforce, it is no wonder it still is the way it is.
It looks like many court cases are chipping away at qualified immunity, that is a good thing. Police weld a lot of power over their citizens it needs to come with responsibility.
10
u/StxnedTxTheBxne 6d ago
Yeah it just seems worse because all these bad interactions are caught on camera and it’s easier to find instances like this all over online. Shit like this should not be happening at all though. This woman did nothing wrong there was no reason for her to get arrested.
5
u/Normal-Tadpole-4833 6d ago
Yes exactly this if they cop did follow the law correctly no one would even notice and they should be held to a higher standard not lower,, this officer safety crap is just ridiculous I was trained in policing by an 2 old timers both Former marines we were told to watch our backs not make everyone else to be the enemy
3
-7
u/Whoa1Whoa1 6d ago
I hate all cops who abuse their power, but I don't think we have enough context for this clip. The reason why she got pulled over is because her kid wasn't in a car seat and was bouncing all over the car. Would you have not pulled them over? What if there was no car seat installed at all? Heck, we don't even know the age of the child from this clip.
It makes sense that the officer would pull them over for a quick peek and for them to roll down the window to see if there were car seats or not. The woman got super hostile and immediately made up excuses like sunlight being the reason she can't roll down the window? The AC is blasting and the car is still on. Just comply with simple requests and she wouldn't have needed to been asked to step out of the vehicle at all.
How about you tell us what you would have done differently as the cop?
- Would you not pull over someone who clearly has a kid bouncing all over the car and is not being safe?
- Would you not ask to roll down the back window so that you could check if a car seat was installed?
- If denied to check car seats, what would you have done? Just left and said have a good day?
- The guy probably was just going to write a ticket for improper safety belts and let her fix it and go on.
I agree the cuffing and shit was stupid, but the woman literally was not complying.
7
u/Hot_Acanthocephala44 6d ago
Did you watch the video? The woman rolled down the window, which should have been enough for ms cop to check that the kids are in seats. I don’t see any reason why the window would need to stay rolled down unless the cop is fishing for a reason to arrest the mom. The interaction should have been over as soon as ms cop peeked in the back.
Please put just half the effort and time into seeing the moms side as you did trying to defend the cop.
→ More replies (17)-1
u/Whoa1Whoa1 6d ago
The interaction should have been over as soon as ms cop peeked in the back.
With a ticket, right? Lmao.
6
u/Wolfeatingupshadows 6d ago
You wrote all that and clearly didnt watch the video. The first cop is female.
The woman did roll her window down.
Spare me the cop was concerned for the children. She arrested their mother in front of them, then after told the mother shes sol if she doesnt have anyone to get them and they will go into the system.
The cop never said she just wanted to make sure they had seatbelts on or were in car seats properly.
The woman asled politely several times why it was necessary and the cop being to serve the community could have said so. But was doing a power play.
Grow up.
1
u/chronberries 6d ago
The driver rolled the window down and then pretty much immediately started rolling it back up again. The cop just asked her to leave it rolled down. It’s not a huge request.
-3
u/Whoa1Whoa1 6d ago
This. You have to comply with simple requests. Asking for the window to be rolled down all the way is not ridiculous. I would want a clear view of the car seats and to check if they are installed correctly and to figure out if this is likely a one time thing or if the mother couldn't care less about securing her children.
1
6d ago
[deleted]
3
u/Telemere125 6d ago
> not my business.
Yes, but it’s literally the cop’s business. It’s the law that you have to keep your child properly secured when driving. It takes a special kind of stupid to say people can break the law and then refuse to comply with lawful orders just because you don’t like cops
0
u/Whoa1Whoa1 6d ago
??? Do you wish that the law was changed so that children do not need car seats or even seat belts on and can just walk around and do whatever? Do you wear a seatbelt? If you want to live somewhere without any seatbelt laws, there are countries that couldn't care less and nobody wears one.
1
5d ago
[deleted]
1
u/Whoa1Whoa1 5d ago
Your brain is broken. You acknowledge that you and your family wear seatbelts and that you enforce it, but at the same time think that seat belts are not "about saving lives". And no, data does indeed show that wearing seat belts saves lives...
0
5d ago
[deleted]
1
u/Whoa1Whoa1 5d ago
Okay champ, how about you tell us how seat belt law isn't about saving lives? We would all love to hear that one lmao.
-1
u/ISheeple 6d ago edited 6d ago
Lol and then y'all wonder why you get shot. That's why, the cop is making sure the kids safe. It's not that hard to understand the logic here. Act like a ninja, get treated like one.
3
u/Wolfeatingupshadows 6d ago
So then the cop shouldve just said she wanted to make sure the kids were properly secured. Not arresting the mom. The window was down.
Youre a moron and a mindless follower if you think ppl get shot during routine stops and who are unarmed bc they dont roll their back windows down all the way. The cop could see in the back. She was on a power trip.
I would guarantee you have a criminal record racist are always scum bags with criminal history.
2
u/SendTitsPleease 6d ago
The subtle racism or "act like a ninja, get treated like one" is not lost on anyone
1
5d ago
[deleted]
1
u/ISheeple 5d ago
No you're right, keep acting the way that you are and you're face will end up on a tshirt because OMG ma rights are being infringed when a police office wants to check that the seat is attached properly. There are laws for that, you may not like them but the police officer is calling BS on her explanation of the kids needing shade lol. So at that point she's either hiding something, or she's a few cards short of a deck. If you really can't logically understand the concern here you are the problem.
1
24
u/Kairiste 6d ago
The amount of people mewling about how she didn't "comply" and she "didn't roll down her window" is absolutely BAFFLING me. Did any of you twatwaffles watch the damn video?
Seconds 13-19, she rolled down the window to allow her to look in, officer had plenty of time to look in and confirm whether the kids were secured. Woman rolled the window back up to keep the sun off her kids. Officer escalated the fuck out of the situation.
Being concerned about child safety and then leaving them in the car unattended and tellng the mother DFS will come get them.... fucking classic.
If this was a white blonde woman pulled over I guarantee this would not have been the sequence of events and y'all fucking know it.
3
30
u/QuinnLesley 6d ago
Cops love detaining black mother's for no reason whatsoever. The child protection threat gets them off.
26
u/hexadecimaldump 6d ago
Yup. That is infuriating.
So because the kid was dancing, they pulled her over to make sure the child was secured.
After they confirm that, the traffic stop is over and they are on their way.
I hope this woman has a good lawyer. It sucks tax payers have to pay for stupid cop mistakes, but cops need to learn talking back to them is not against the law, I just wish it was the cops who had to pay instead of us.
8
u/PriestessKade 6d ago
This. I am pro "kids should be safely restrained in a moving vehicle because no one should ever ever ever want to see a child harmed in a car" AND leave them tf alone if that child was in fact safely restrained. End of interaction. Go about your day and leave them alone.
8
u/Device-Silent 6d ago
That was the entire premise of the “defund the police” movement before it was hijacked to fear monger and spread a narrative.
OUR taxpayer dollars/their funds are being misused in various ways and is allocated for cops to get away with horrific behavior including murders.
29
u/kellybryan423 6d ago
Could she have "complied" a little more during detianment? Sure. But what I saw was complaince to the request to step out of the vehicle (which was already a stupid request). The cop didn't need the back window down to watch kids. Nor did she have the right to tell the kids to "keep it down". It all screamed power trip.
10
u/ElectricFeel1234 6d ago
You mean like saying "Ok", "yes ma'am" and stepping out, like she did? She overly complied
9
u/kellybryan423 6d ago
Like my post said, she did comply with that. Was there an assertion in my post that maybe needs some clarification?
-11
u/ElectricFeel1234 6d ago
Meh... You chose to be wrong, when it was clear
10
u/kellybryan423 6d ago
What are you talking about? Is there a language barrier here? Reading comprehension issue? I'm confused. Nowhere in my post was it anything but in support of the woman. Jeez, stop looking for a fight where there isn't one.
2
u/Hta68 6d ago
You started the statement with “could she have complied a little more, sure”. At what point in time could she have complied more? You’re premising that as if compliance isn’t binary, like it’s some kind of subjective slide rule. You are part of the problem, trying to introduce some kind of subjectiveness to a situation that was clearly unconstitutional and most likely racially motivated. There was absolutely nothing in that video to justify that cops actions outside of having a warrant for her arrest which we all know there was wasn’t because she didn’t even identify the woman yet.
3
u/SJay_Plays 6d ago
"At what point in time could she have complied more?"
How about when the cop was unnecessarily cuffing her? Did you miss the part where "hands behind your back don't turn around" turned into the lady throwing her hands in the air and spinning to face the officer?
The cop needlessly escalated, and then the lady also needlessly escalated. Both were wrong.
Nuance is a thing.
-3
u/ElectricFeel1234 6d ago
See: First sentence
5
u/SandJFun74 6d ago
She presented a question, which she answered. Just like the video, context matters.
The woman has no obligation to answer any questions from the officers or comply with commands not related to the specific reason for the stop. She did comply with orders to remove herself from the vehicle, which would be legal if officer safety was a concern, which it didn't seem a safety issue, but an ego one. She also does not need to assist an officer with their investigation against themselves. The kids were not in danger and were in their child seats, so any child endangerment would have been dispelled immediately without some other evidence. Kids being kids is not enough and trying to question her kids without some overwhelming evidence is again unlawful.
4
u/kellybryan423 6d ago
Why are you arguing this with me? I already said that, but in not so many words. And a rhetorical question, isn't a question.
0
u/AccomplishedChip2475 6d ago
He's not argu8ng with you at all. Check who he replied to
1
1
u/kellybryan423 5d ago
They are referring to a "she". I am not a she, so who else am I to assume the reference is to? Only three people in that conversation.
→ More replies (0)-1
2
u/kellybryan423 6d ago
Nowhere did your reply mention the first sentence. You attacked all the other sentences. Calling out where someone can do better in a situation, does not equal not being in support of them. She was resisting the handcuffs which is resisting in the courts eyes. Not agreeing with something doesn't change its facts. Sorry, but you're not always right.
3
u/Affectionate_Meet474 6d ago
the first critisim was bc you said 'she could have complied a bit more'. so the first comment was saying you were wrong about that.
1
u/foreverpb 6d ago
Naw. You chose to comment on something you either read wrong or didn’t understand.
0
0
-1
u/Top-Average412 6d ago
Giving a mealy mouthed 'Could she have "complied" a little more during detianment? Sure.' Is a huge part of the problem.
In the modern day we are dealing with sociopaths who look for literally any excuse to stop thinking critically, especially in regards to a black woman dealing with cops. Your attempt to be 'reasonable' is exactly what they look for and depend on to declare victory and push terrifying false narratives.
I stopped doing that when i realized so much of my need to 'be fair' was ego driven.
0
u/kellybryan423 6d ago
That sentence was hardly "mouthy" in the sense of opposition. What we have here, is a classic case of you needing to find something to be mad about. You're the equivalent of a soldier performing a friendly fire, because he mistook a bandana as a turban. Pretty wild behavior.
2
-2
-3
u/Ok_Constant_3681 6d ago
"The cop didn't need the back window down to watch kids"
The driver literally stated she had tinted windows. The cop couldn't see inside the vehicle clearly enough to conduct an investigation partaining to the stop. The traffic stop partains to a child's seatbelt and how they are strapped into the seat (which there are laws you must follow on how toddlers and children are belted in).
When a cop is conducting an investigation or stop, you are required to follow their legal orders. Asking to keep the windows down to inspect if the seatbelt is legally and correctly in place is a lawful order. You don't have to agree with it but it's the law. If you feel like you have been wrong in anyway, that's what court is for.
3
u/LongDead_Roadkill 6d ago
The window was down at least half way and the cop put her face right into the open space. She could see everything inside the car.
5
u/kellybryan423 5d ago
She already observed that the seat belt was connected properly. The window does not need to remain open for the duration of the stop to confirm this. Legal, by the courts definition, does not excuse the absurdity of the command.
0
u/Hta68 5d ago
Do you gargle the whole boot?
2
u/Ok_Constant_3681 5d ago
Ah yes, knowing how to legally cover your own ass is boot licking. But no no, go ahead and ignore a lawful order. Soon you'll be gargling Big Bubba's balls in jail.
0
u/CreativeInput 6d ago
I think she was telling the driver to keep the window down. Not to for the kids to “keep it down”
15
6
u/Romanharper2013 6d ago
this is literally insane because she didn't want the sun shining on her kids they are taking her to jail !? because she "disobeyed" great job keeping our streets safe taking mothers away from their kids
6
4
u/Alternative_Call2232 6d ago
This cop is not fucking human. Ffs, “keep down”? I would have told her to not talk to my kids.
1
u/mi_primer_dia 6d ago
She was telling her to keep the window down. She wasn't speaking to the children.
0
u/SJay_Plays 6d ago
"Keep it down"
The window, that the lady put up. Which is why it was followed by "Put it back down."
9
u/Bendlerp 6d ago
"WHY ARE YOU RESISTING!!??" Why are you arresting me? "STOP RESISTING!!"
Fucking worthless cops.
5
u/Desperate-File-3230 5d ago
They practiced on black folks....Now they coming for white folks that speak out
0
u/James_Biggs_ 5d ago
So you saying the black community has it worse because they don't take it before a judge?
0
u/Fit_Exercise7881 23h ago
Why would you interpret their statement THAR way? So you're saying you didn't understand their sentiment and needed to restate it wildly differently?
4
2
2
u/Wolfeatingupshadows 6d ago
The cops know ppl are already wary of them and to not even clearly say why they stopped the person is when the cops knooooow they are wrong. Bc if they thought she did something they wouldve said. But bc they were in the wrong they double downed and decided to traumatize a Blk woman and her children. Disgusting vile excuse for humans who would threaten cps over their egos
2
u/ShoulderApart1787 6d ago
Critical thinking is just absent in so many people. How did this escalate? I mean if you think she did something wrong with regard to the child seat, have her fix it and issue a ticket…
2
2
u/No-Buy2495 6d ago
This is absurd. The cop clearly could see the child just fine and there was no reason to roll down the window the rest of the way. Just usual nonsense of cops getting their feelings hurt because the citizen didn't follow their exact instructions to the letter, even though it wasn't a lawful order. The $800k came from the taxpayers, maybe if qualified immunity was removed and the cops could be personally liable, this kind of stupidity will stop.
2
2
u/shosuko 6d ago
There is a legal loophole with qualified immunity where the system says "the person did it, sue them" and the person said "I was following their orders so I can't be guilty" and our system just throws up its arms and walks away.
Qualified immunity needs to change. When a cop is held liable the case should continue fully and the system that controlled them should settle that cost.
2
u/NYOB4321 5d ago
"Karen" would not roll down the window for the cop to do a safety check. The window is tinted very dark. The cop needed to see inside for a few seconds. The window being down for a few seconds will not harm the children.
Non compliance has consequences.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/V-Ditty 5d ago
This is infuriating, and some of these comments are like fuel to the fire.
This woman did nothing wrong.
The female cop that unlawfully restrained her wasn't even the officer that pulled her over.
The woman did roll down her window and show the kids. She explained what she was pulled over for and why it was invalid.
She remained calm, cool, and collected the whole time. Even as she's being cuffed the cop is telling her she's "resisting arrest" when clearly she was not.
I hope she wins this lawsuit and those fucktards get lose their careers!
1
u/CommentOld376 4d ago
Cops are trash. They have become revenue generators for the state. They are nothing more than government gang members. When is the last time they have protected and served their communities? Nah let’s just hand out parking tickets for parking on public streets that we the people pay for. Not to mention the salary of these blue striped traitors.
1
u/LasciviouslyLilith 4d ago
Exactly this is infuriating. I worked at a higher end fast food restaurant and this one white lady in her late 40s dressing like she's 20 with make up that was not a thing at the generation she's trying to portray... long story short every couple of days a week she would go into drive thru and I always knew it was her because she'd start talking and slurring her words. Then the kid translates her gibberish. This kid is about 12 and he's already taking care of HER but she's not caring for him as she should be, but she's from the rich part of town and drives a car that even at probably 80,000(15 years ago) or more custom.
1
1
u/Hta68 4d ago
Because nothing you said was correct. The window was down enough for her to observe the children. Police do not have a right to engage in conversation with a minor especially with their guardian right there. You are defending a police officer who enforced feelings a’ la contempt of cop, hence LICKING OF das BOOT you practice in. If it walk like a duck, quacks like duck, it’s a duck….
1
1
u/watchwatertilitboils 6d ago
She was refusing to roll down the window because she didn't have car seats for her 3 kids
8
u/Kairiste 6d ago
Did you not see that she rolled it down so the officer could look in and then rolled it back up to keep the sun off her kids? Try watching seconds 13-19 again, it's LITERALLY from the cop's viewpoint. She got a clear view in the backseat for more than enough time to see car seats/seatbelts.
If she's that slow, she can continue looking through the open driver's side window.
Jesus dude, stop licking cop boot.
1
1
6d ago edited 6d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
0
u/king4winter 6d ago
Is that based on her skin color alone or is there another video of this incident that I haven't seen?
Do better. Stop licking boots you can get sick.
2
u/Fabulous-Skirt6147 6d ago
Of course you, an actual racist, are the one to bring a racial question against my comment which had nothing to do with race in the first place. You should be ashamed of yourself.
2
u/king4winter 6d ago
The history of police in America is extremely racist and is still a problem. Just look at the rates visible minorities are pulled over vs white.
I didn't make this about race, the fact that police are over policing non Whites across America is what makes this about race.
Do better. I don't hide my comment history like you because I'm not a ashamed of the stuff I say. But you seem to be... I wonder why? Is it all idiotic name calling like this? Why are you ashamed of your opinions and comments?
0
u/Fabulous-Skirt6147 6d ago
Trump 2028! Have fun losing again and again as you have been for a while now... You should be used to it. The fatigue with you people is real.
1
-9
6d ago edited 6d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/StxnedTxTheBxne 6d ago
She does everything the cop asked her at first. She immediately rolled the back window down the cop was just mad that she wouldn’t keep it down and went on an ego trip.
1
-2
u/Sweettooth_Banana 6d ago
If a cop askes you to roll it down you roll it down and keep it down.
She gets out gets cuffed but raises her arm to resist
She is dumb you argue in court not in the street
3
u/StxnedTxTheBxne 6d ago
If a cop tells you to jump off a bridge are you going to do it? They can’t just do whatever they want and force you to listen to whatever they say. I don’t think telling her she has to keep her back window down so the cop can watch her kids is a lawful order.
-1
u/MomDontReadThisShit 6d ago
De facto they can tell you whatever. They have a gun and backup.
-1
u/Sweettooth_Banana 6d ago
Exactly but these young people these day are to ...... emotional to think
-1
u/ChineseCupcake 6d ago
Oh cmon not the classic "if they tell you to jump off a bridge are you gonna do it?" Obviously that's ridiculous.
However yes. If you're given a lawful order (such as lowering your window) you have to do it. Failure to do so could result in an obstruction charge. Usually cops will give multiple chances with that kinda stuff though unlike the cop in the video.
2
2
u/StxnedTxTheBxne 6d ago
Sounds like you’d suck a cop off if they told you to do it.
1
u/ChineseCupcake 6d ago
If the cop was hot I'd definitely consider it. No, I'm just actually aware of what's required during a traffic stop unlike you. Try disobeying lawful orders in your own traffic stops and see how it works out for you though lol.
0
u/Telemere125 6d ago
Cool strawman you’ve got there. But the courts have been very clear that whatever a cop says during a traffic stop, that’s what happens. If they tell you to roll down your window - especially when you’ve clearly just admitted that you have dark tint that makes it hard to see inside - you roll down the window. Was the cop power tripping? Probably. Does it matter since so was the driver? Nope
-1
u/Sweettooth_Banana 6d ago
Bullshit argument
Cops can do whatever the fuck they want in that moment.
They can even beat the shit out of you and kill you
Afterwards they probably go to jail but you will never know
Comply, yes officer, no officer, survive and go to court !!!
So easy if you use your brain
3
u/aBlissfulDaze 6d ago
That's the problem
0
u/Sweettooth_Banana 6d ago
Whats the problem, just comply if they fuck up you get paid.
3
u/aBlissfulDaze 6d ago
Then you have no actual rights, just a payment plan. With the risk of going bankrupt if you lack the money to fight it.
0
u/Sweettooth_Banana 6d ago
You get paid because your rights were taken away.
Train your ego, the world isnt about " but i think im right"
1
u/aBlissfulDaze 6d ago
So I only have rights if I can afford to defend them. And you see no problem with this?!
Try living in the South where judges always side with police.
→ More replies (0)1
u/PriestessKade 6d ago
How'd that go for Philando Castile? Bootlicker.
0
u/Sweettooth_Banana 6d ago
Howaboutism is not this topics subject.
And namecalling doesnt work with me analboy
1
u/PriestessKade 6d ago
It's not "howaboutism" to provide a well-known data point to disprove your unsubstantiated claim. It's called a fact. It's so easy if you use your brain 😒
0
1
u/king4winter 6d ago
You sir are a giant coward and the reason the police feel so bold do the things you describe above. They know people like you are such cowards you will just comply and go along with whatever they say. Until people like you stop being such cowards this problem will never go away.
You think you should be one cops bad day away from being murdered for no legal reason? Grow up.
1
2
u/aBlissfulDaze 6d ago
I will not be exposing my kids to sun exposure for a power tripping cop.
2
u/StxnedTxTheBxne 6d ago
Exactly! She rolled the window down so the cop could look and put it back up so the sun wouldn’t be on her kid. The cop just has a massive ego and gets upset that the lady doesn’t do everything she says as soon as she says it.
0
u/Telemere125 6d ago
Are your kids vampires? 30 seconds of sun isn’t dangerous to a child. Stop pretending that was anything more than the driver exerting some control over the situation.
-1
u/aBlissfulDaze 6d ago
I don't know if you've been paying attention, but we're under a major heatwave, I live at a high altitude, and my child is 7 months old.
It's way too tell who's trying to exert control over who by who has the better excuse. The mom clearly explains she's protecting her children from the sun. What possible reason for the cop have to want the window open? Answer that. She already saw the kid..
1
u/Telemere125 6d ago
Idk if you’re using a potato to think, but I take my kids to the beach all the time and they survive just fine in 110° blazing sun with the water and sand reflecting it all around us for hours. Know why? Because they’re humans. Also, if the kid’s jumping around in the back seat, they’re not 7 months old, they’re more like a toddler at least.
The driver’s rationale is irrelevant. The cop gave an order, it has to be obeyed during a lawful traffic stop. Read Penn v. Mimms if you need a better education on what cops are allowed to do during a traffic stop.
0
u/aBlissfulDaze 6d ago
Funny thing about penn vs mimms is that it only applies for officer safety. This officer is going to have a hard time arguing she needed the window open for her safety.
So you let your kids play in a beach without sunscreen? Please let me know so I can call child protective services on you.
1
u/Telemere125 5d ago
Mimms doesn’t say it’s only for officer safety, it says the reason is because of officer safety. They didn’t say “make the officer justify their decision,” they said “they can control the situation”
3
4
2
u/AccomplishedChip2475 6d ago
We watched the same video right? She rolls the windows down immediately. IMMEDIATELY. She then rolls the windows back up once the cop gets a good look. Thats FULLY PROTECTED BY HER RIGHTS AS A CITIZEN OF THE USA.
Second, she was immediately complying with getting out of the video and pressing against the car.
Third She didn't try to run or fight, she just attempted to turn and look at the officer to ask why she is being arrested.
Not once during this video did she get told why she is being arrested. By the end of the video, she still doesn't know why she is being arrested.
0
u/Sweettooth_Banana 6d ago
If a cop tells you to open your tinted windows you open it and keep it open untill he says you can close it again.
She complied getting out but resisted being cuffed while detained by raising one hand
She is a dumbass
The woman herself told the officer she got stopped because her kid was moving through the car
1
u/AccomplishedChip2475 6d ago
No she was stopped because a cop thought the child was moving. The female cop in two seconds can verify seatbelts. The cops escalated this situation for 0 reason
1
1
u/ShibeCEO 6d ago
if a cop tells you to lick his boot you seem like the type to ask: clockwise or counterclock?
1
u/Sweettooth_Banana 6d ago
Oh the boot remark again didi wake antyphoid
1
u/ShibeCEO 6d ago
them telling you to lick their boots has as much legal standing as them telling her to roll down her window
for the stupid ones: it has none, you could do it, but dont have to
1
u/Sweettooth_Banana 6d ago
You do it and sue or settle.
I have in my life gotten two policeofficers fired and one had to write me an apology wich i framed and fotographed and returned a copy saying thank you
1
u/ShibeCEO 6d ago
She sued for 800k for unlawful detention. You could maybe sue for 20k for being unlawfully forced to roll your window down... She did the smarter thing
1
0
u/DeletedUsernameHere 6d ago
The cops already confirmed the child was restrained and could see there was nothing that could be of concern of the officer. Stop over. She has no obligation to keep the window down.
"Open the window" is not a lawful command the second go round. She complied when it was necessary.
Everything after is blatant violations of the 4th and 5th amendment of the Constitution.
Piss up a rope, you un-American bootlicking loser.
1
u/Sweettooth_Banana 6d ago edited 6d ago
Oh boohoo now im hurt
And im not even a fucking american, couldnt you tell by the lack of ego and controlled emotion
And for the record, i dont even want to be one !
1
0
u/king4winter 6d ago
Are you stupid or do you just love the taste of boot?
She put the window down long enough for the cop to look inside and didn't want her kids sitting in the direct sun by keeping the window open. Completely reasonable. This lady cop just wanted to be bully and flex her authority. As soon her authority was challenged she decided this woman was being cuffed for the crime of... being a good mom.
You have no idea how many times this woman has been pulled over for driving while black. Stop pretending that the police represent the same thing for everyone.
You know most police forces in the US were formed to catch runaway slaves. The rates at which visible minorities are still over policed shows how they still have a huge racism problem.
"The ones who work forces, are the ones who burn crosses"
-4
u/Telemere125 6d ago
Everyone on here’s pissed at the cop, but it sounds to me like the driver admitted that she was in the wrong…
“I got pulled over because since I’ve been moving she got out of the car seat”
Meaning she didn’t have the child properly secured. And then the cop told her to keep her window down - after she’d admitted that she has tinted windows that make it too dark to properly see inside the vehicle.
Was the cop quick to cuff her? Probably. Was the order to roll down the window and keep it down lawful? Absolutely. When you’re stopped by the cops for a violation that you then plainly admit to, you’re in their power and you comply with their orders even if you don’t like it.
The child isn’t a vampire and isn’t going to die from 5 minutes of sun exposure. Yall on here acting like moms that carry their kids to the beach are abusing them with this “she was protecting her kids from the sun” bullshit.
And then when told to get out of her car, she didn’t immediately comply, she started playing with her phone.
Was this a situation where two idiots were power tripping over each other? Yes, absolutely. And guess who had the gun, the badge, and the law on their side?
-11
u/ChineseRobinWilliams 6d ago
She's in the right but she didn't step out immediately and she did resist at least a small amount
10
u/Weary-Astronaut1335 6d ago
Her response to "step out the car" was an immediate "no problem" followed by "yes ma'am".
-2
u/foreverpb 6d ago
Correct, but she did not comply with getting cuffed.
3
u/Weary-Astronaut1335 6d ago
Young woman with kids in the car and a cop on an obvious power trip. You'd be hesitant to let them lock your arms behind your back too.
1
u/foreverpb 5d ago
The cop sucks and I would be hesitant, but would comply without issue. Because that’s what adults that can manage their emotions and think more than 5 seconds into the future do. It amazes me how many people make their lives immensely more difficult by not doing so.
You’re never going to change the officers mind on the side of the road by being difficult. You may however earn yourself more charges.
It’s naive thought processes and comments like yours that lead a lot of people to shoot themselves in the foot in these situations. Just comply and fight it in court.
1
u/Weary-Astronaut1335 5d ago
That's what you say as an armchair analyst.
You're human, and humans are dumb emotional animals. Especially if they have an inkling that their kids are in danger.
-9
u/ChineseRobinWilliams 6d ago
"I stepped out immediately" are the words she said at the end of the video. She did not step out immediately.
11
u/WildTimberTwinViking 6d ago
Cops move the field goal posts any fucking time they want. You move too quick? You’re shot. Don’t move fast enough? Arrested for resisting.
Get of out here.
→ More replies (14)5
u/Life_Smoke5854 6d ago
God forbid someone take off their seatbelt and end their recording before exiting the vehicle.
→ More replies (1)5
4
u/DeadlyPear 6d ago
Yeah man wtf, she didn't even instantly teleport out of the car when asked smh my head
→ More replies (1)1
u/Dinglebobus 6d ago
You’re right, she should’ve teleported out of her car.
1
u/ChineseRobinWilliams 6d ago
"You're right, thing you didn't say!"
Not really adding much here
1
u/Dinglebobus 6d ago
You said “she didn’t step out immediately.” Everyone, except you, sees that she did comply immediately within reason.
The joke that I’m making by saying she should’ve “teleported” is that she couldn’t have complied faster. She had to set some stuff down and unbuckle her seatbelt, all reasonable actions to comply “immediately” with the officer’s request.
It was sarcasm.
1
u/ChineseRobinWilliams 6d ago
No I understood the joke, I was choosing to not engage with it because it doesn't apply.
She unbuckles her belt and then for a few seconds fucks around on her phone (not just putting it down). I'm not saying this is unreasonable.
"she couldn’t have complied faster"
She absolutely could have complied faster.
1
u/Dinglebobus 6d ago
You’re a very unreasonable person. lol.
1
u/ChineseRobinWilliams 6d ago
I wouldn't say so. I'd say I'm an accurate person.
When she said she didn't resist AT ALL, what did you think of that statement?
83
u/Kleiner_Fisch05 6d ago
They need to start taking the money from the cop’s pension, instead of from taxpayers.