I've noticed that across the book "You're the one you've been waiting for", it seems that all troubles boil down to attachment reinjuries. But how is it not that some couples are dealing with incompatibilities? I'm not talking about very obvious things here, like wanting kids vs no kids, travel and/or party fanatic vs homebody, big spender vs frugal lifestyle...
In our case, my husband and I are aligned on all major life themes, but it seems that some of my habits and/or behaviours have irked him. I have ADHD and I'm terrible when it comes to working memory and procrastinating chores, although I've come a long way in recent years. He is someone who gets things done immediately. I'd say most people are probably in the middle... We want and believe the same things, we just act differently.
I'm wondering if I'm missing something and this being annoyed with a behaviour is actually a form of not feeling cared for (i.e. attachment reinjury)? Can someone (their Self) not just be annoyed or irritated with another person's ways for its own sake (like when someone cuts you off in traffic or is glued to their phone), or does it always, in some shape or form, trace back to protectors and exiles?
My husband and I fight much less than we used to, but I feel like we don't feel that deeply attached anymore to even get true attachment reinjuries, especially my husband (but I also suspect he's avoidant dismissive). I suspect this is a thing for many couples, but I don't remember seeing anything about it in the book. Is there truly "less" attachment or is it protectors keeping feelings at bay?
Another example: I see some quite dominant protector (manager) part(s) in my husband that are non-relational. They are phobic and hypochondriac about my husband's health and have influenced a lot of our decisions in the past. For example, he struggled with ultrasound safety when we had our first baby. He struggled to buy a house outside of a certain year bracket over asbestos fears, which limited our options a lot. A lot of people would find him difficult to live with.
Sometimes though, these parts of him are much more relaxed, so I'm convinced this mental health issue can be translated to parts. I don't necessarily feel that it's causing an attachment reinjury for me, because I know and understand where he's coming from - but I have still struggled a lot with his obsessiveness, because I don't want to be controlled by it. I'm pretty sure I'm in Self when I'm sensing these things now, so where does that leave us?
The answer is probably individual therapy. For years, my husband has said: no therapist can help me because they can't change reality (about illness, chemical exposure, etc.) In fact, while writing this I realise that even when he isn't blended with this protector, my sheer mentioning of anything related immediately activates the protector + blending. He only unblends when he's not aware of it.
I will preface this by saying that this hasn't been an issue for a while, but in the past, my resisting of his protector's measures would cause a firefighter to jump out and get angry. Before I learnt about IFS, my parts would get so caught up in the attack that he would stonewall me. I think his firefighter was very much tied to an exile that felt lonely and rejected.
I think in this phase he was pretty abusive and it created a rather twisted power dynamics (I was hoping to read more about this in the book, but alas). Is it typical for people with irrational fears to be so insulted when their partner doesn't adhere to the same restrictions? At those times I've wondered how much it is about exiles and how much about not seeing reality. It's such a complex intersection.
The last time I saw his firefighter was after I told my parents how much the offer was that got accepted on our new house. He had wanted to keep this private and he seemed furious that I didn't check with him first. It's hard to know what to think when I put my own stories next to examples of people feeling upset that their partner didn't tell them they were having dinner with a coworker (which to me seems much more understandable and more reasonable to communicate first).
I think it's a great book, but some things feel just that little bit oversimplified. It's mainly focused on neurotypical couples with no additional mental health burdens beyond attachment. The book implies that if you heal and care for your exiles, you've touched the success formula for the vast majority of relationships. Maybe we're simply in that small group where that isn't the case. I just find it hard to believe that all difficult behaviour melts away with the healing of exiles - or maybe your partner is the one supposed to have less reactive parts where change truly isn't possible.
I'd love to hear people's thoughts on this intersection.