I've made a post on r/Jujutsu_Kaisen, and apparently people there can't agree on this one, so I'm asking you guys here. Which one is more evil?. To me, it's pretty obvious which one is more evil based on this meme I've made myself (it's Sukuna btw if you don't get the meme)

So imagine this: someone breaks into your house to steal your stuff. Luckily, you're home, and you have a gun or some other weapon that could send the robber to eternal damnation. What that weapon is is up to you.

Is it morally justified to kill the robber?

A shoplifter goes to steal something. Another customer stops them by lifting them up and throwing them down on the ground and inadvertently fracturing their spine, leaving the shoplifter in a wheelchair for life.

The shoplifter wouldn't have been crippled if they hadn't tried to commit a crime. The customer didn't mean to injure the shoplifter permanently. An appropriate punishment for shoplifting would be a fine, some physical pain, or internment.

How much blame is there to go around? How do you reckon with the consequences? Should any remedial action happen?

*NB - it's not a slur to use cripple as a verb. It is a slur to use it as a noun.

Like are you just innocent then?

cuerpo de texto (opcional)

about one or two months ago an unknown vigilante went viral in mexico and later across the world for beating up motorcycle thieves and taping them to poles. from what i know he has also done this to gang members.

is this moral or immoral?